Injury surveillance in elite field hockey: a pilot study of three different recording techniques.
Epidemiology
Field hockey
Injury
Journal
BMJ open sport & exercise medicine
ISSN: 2055-7647
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101681007
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
accepted:
24
10
2020
entrez:
11
12
2020
pubmed:
12
12
2020
medline:
12
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In field hockey, injuries are assessed by various recording techniques leading to a heterogenic collection of poorly comparable injury data. Injury data were prospectively collected at the 2016 Men's Hockey Junior World Cup using the match injury reports (MIRs), video injury clips provided by the Fédération Internationale de Hockey, and daily medical reports (DMRs). A pilot study comparing injury type, mechanism, location on the field, injured body part and overall injury incidence among the different injury recording techniques was performed. MIRs and video injury clips were completely available for analysis. DMRs were returned from 11 out of 16 teams (69%). In total, MIRs yielded 28, video analysis 36, and DMRs 56 injuries. Overall injury rate varied between 24.8 and 57.9 injuries per 1000 player match hours. The majority of injuries affected the lower limbs by all three methods (41.7-61.2%) and were mainly caused by having been hit by the ball (20.4-50%) or stick (11.1-28.6%). Reports of concussions during competition were incoherent between MIR (2 cases) and DMR (no cases). The DMR was the only method to record overuse injuries (16.1%), injuries in training (12.5%), and time-loss injuries of one or two days (12.5%) or of three or more days (14.3%). Injury data vary substantially between the MIR, DMR and injury video recording technique. Each recording technique revealed specific strengths and limitations. To further advance injury research in field hockey, the strengths of each recording technique should be brought together for a synergistic injury assessment model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33304606
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000908
pii: bmjsem-2020-000908
pmc: PMC7704285
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000908Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Oct;21(5):713-20
pubmed: 20459470
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):686-90
pubmed: 22102103
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2009 Sep-Oct;8(5):267-72
pubmed: 19741355
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(11):657-60
pubmed: 26246418
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):188-91
pubmed: 17513909
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jun;28(6):1708-1714
pubmed: 29377400
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):192-6
pubmed: 17513910
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):565-76
pubmed: 16303876
J Athl Train. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):211-20
pubmed: 17710169
Br J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;42(6):413-21
pubmed: 18390916
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(7):510-2
pubmed: 24620038
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Feb;33(2):201-7
pubmed: 11224806
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;40(3):193-201
pubmed: 16505073
Br J Sports Med. 2007 May;41(5):328-31
pubmed: 17452684
Res Sports Med. 2013;21(4):318-29
pubmed: 24067118
Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Feb 06;:
pubmed: 32032161
Br J Sports Med. 2013 May;47(7):407-14
pubmed: 23515712
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):849-866
pubmed: 29299879
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;54(7):372-389
pubmed: 32071062
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0201834
pubmed: 30138463
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Oct;53(20):1264-1267
pubmed: 30954947
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):2027-34
pubmed: 26093006