Resource assessment in trials undertaken in residential care homes: Experiences from the Australian MIDDEL cluster randomised controlled trial research team.

Dementia Intervention adherence Music therapy Nursing homes Project management Recruitment Residential aged care Resource assessment

Journal

Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 10 08 2020
revised: 10 11 2020
accepted: 22 11 2020
entrez: 11 12 2020
pubmed: 12 12 2020
medline: 12 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The resources involved in delivering a clinical trial in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) are significant and the success of a trial is dependent upon adequate planning, including appropriate timelines for each component of the study and the required budget. This paper describes process and resource assessment during recruitment, collection of outcome measures and intervention delivery, and presents learnings and considerations for conducting trials in RACFs with people living with dementia. Data were collected across 24 clusters in 12 RACFs over 18 months during a cluster randomised controlled trial which was testing the effectiveness of music interventions in people living with dementia. Data were collected on resources required for recruitment and assessment of baseline data, as well as reasons for participant non-attendance at the interventions. Time between contacting next of kin and receiving formal consent often exceeded 45 days. The ratio of time between direct and indirect research activity was approximately 1:2. Participant intervention adherence is at risk from unplanned RACF lockdowns and reasons for non-attendance include those both related directly to the participant and to staff resources, scheduling or other practical considerations. Research planning should focus on building relationships with RACF staff and resident families, factor in adequate time for recruitment in the study timeline and consider budgeting for backfill of RACF staff during data collection phases to expedite the process and ensure adherence to study protocol timelines. A.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The resources involved in delivering a clinical trial in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) are significant and the success of a trial is dependent upon adequate planning, including appropriate timelines for each component of the study and the required budget. This paper describes process and resource assessment during recruitment, collection of outcome measures and intervention delivery, and presents learnings and considerations for conducting trials in RACFs with people living with dementia.
METHODS METHODS
Data were collected across 24 clusters in 12 RACFs over 18 months during a cluster randomised controlled trial which was testing the effectiveness of music interventions in people living with dementia. Data were collected on resources required for recruitment and assessment of baseline data, as well as reasons for participant non-attendance at the interventions.
RESULTS RESULTS
Time between contacting next of kin and receiving formal consent often exceeded 45 days. The ratio of time between direct and indirect research activity was approximately 1:2. Participant intervention adherence is at risk from unplanned RACF lockdowns and reasons for non-attendance include those both related directly to the participant and to staff resources, scheduling or other practical considerations.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Research planning should focus on building relationships with RACF staff and resident families, factor in adequate time for recruitment in the study timeline and consider budgeting for backfill of RACF staff during data collection phases to expedite the process and ensure adherence to study protocol timelines.
TRIAL REGISTRATION AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY ANZCTR12618000156280 1/02/2018 HTTP//ANZCTRORGAU/TRIAL/REGISTRATION/TRIALREVIEWASPX?ACTRN=12618000156280 UNASSIGNED
A.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33305065
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100675
pii: S2451-8654(20)30159-9
pmc: PMC7711137
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100675

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T046740/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Références

Trials. 2018 Jul 13;19(1):378
pubmed: 30005659
West J Nurs Res. 2002 Jun;24(4):373-89
pubmed: 12035911
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2016 Jul 1;9(4):158-60
pubmed: 27434890
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e023436
pubmed: 30928926
BMC Geriatr. 2009 Aug 24;9:38
pubmed: 19703277

Auteurs

Felicity A Baker (FA)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Music and Health, Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway.

Phoebe A Stretton-Smith (PA)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Tanara Vieira Sousa (TV)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Imogen Clark (I)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Alice Cotton (A)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Christian Gold (C)

NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway.

Young-Eun C Lee (YC)

Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Classifications MeSH