Extensive genomic reshuffling involved in the karyotype evolution of genus Cerradomys (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini).
Journal
Genetics and molecular biology
ISSN: 1415-4757
Titre abrégé: Genet Mol Biol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 100883590
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
05
2020
accepted:
07
09
2020
entrez:
11
12
2020
pubmed:
12
12
2020
medline:
12
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rodents of the genus Cerradomys belong to the tribe Oryzomyini and present high chromosome variability with diploid numbers ranging from 2n=46 to 60. Classical cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with telomeric and whole chromosome-specific probes of another Oryzomyini, Oligoryzomys moojeni (OMO), were used to assess the karyotype evolution of the genus. Results were integrated into a molecular phylogeny to infer the hypothetical direction of chromosome changes. The telomeric FISH showed signals in telomeres in species that diverged early in the phylogeny, plus interstitial telomeric signals (ITS) in some species from the most derived clades (C. langguthi, C. vivoi, C. goytaca, and C. subflavus). Chromosome painting revealed homology from 23 segments of C. maracajuensis and C. marinhus to 32 of C. vivoi. Extensive chromosome reorganization was responsible for karyotypic differences in closely related species. Major drivers for genomic reshuffling were in tandem and centric fusion, fission, paracentric and pericentric inversions or centromere repositioning. Chromosome evolution was associated with an increase and decrease in diploid number in different lineages and ITS indicate remnants of ancient telomeres. Cytogenetics results corroborates that C. goytaca is not a junior synonym of C. subflavus since the karyotypic differences found may lead to reproductive isolation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33306775
pii: S1415-47572020000600207
doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0149
pmc: PMC7783725
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e20200149Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688
pubmed: 29692469
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0182218
pubmed: 28763510
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117579
pubmed: 25658766
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
pubmed: 12912839
Chromosoma. 2014 Dec;123(6):529-44
pubmed: 25053180
Lancet. 1971 Oct 30;2(7731):971-2
pubmed: 4107917
J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128-44
pubmed: 1901092
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993;63(3):156-9
pubmed: 8485991
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Oct 06;15:220
pubmed: 26444412
Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):506-13
pubmed: 1867860
Chromosoma. 1995 May;103(9):642-52
pubmed: 7587587
Hereditas. 1999;131(1):15-21
pubmed: 10628293
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 07;10(12):e0143482
pubmed: 26642204
ILAR J. 1998;39(2-3):68-76
pubmed: 11528066
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e100687
pubmed: 24963664
Chromosome Res. 2004;12(4):405-14
pubmed: 15241019
Nature. 2000 Jan 13;403(6766):158
pubmed: 10646592
Chromosome Res. 2013 Apr;21(2):107-19
pubmed: 23494775
Chromosoma. 1990 Apr;99(1):3-10
pubmed: 2340757
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992 Apr;4(3):257-63
pubmed: 1382568
Mutat Res. 2017 Jul;773:51-65
pubmed: 28927537
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001 Feb;18(2):282-92
pubmed: 11161762
Cell. 2006 Mar 10;124(5):901-14
pubmed: 16530039
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):351-358
pubmed: 11403867
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 19;5:113
pubmed: 15318951
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(3-4):219-28
pubmed: 19188690
Hereditas. 1997;127(3):217-29
pubmed: 9474904
Genetica. 2002;114(1):11-6
pubmed: 11990754
Stain Technol. 1956 Nov;31(6):247-51
pubmed: 13380616
Exp Cell Res. 1972 Nov;75(1):304-6
pubmed: 4117921
Chromosome Res. 2000;8(7):585-91
pubmed: 11117354
Genet Mol Biol. 2013 Jul;36(2):201-6
pubmed: 23885202
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1992;61(1):55-7
pubmed: 1505232
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1981;31(2):33-9
pubmed: 7030650