Refining the Baveno VI elastography criteria for the definition of compensated advanced chronic liver disease.

Biopsy Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Elasticity Elasticity Imaging Techniques / methods Europe / epidemiology Female Hepatitis B, Chronic / complications Hepatitis, Alcoholic / complications Humans Liver / diagnostic imaging Liver Cirrhosis / diagnosis Male Middle Aged Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease / complications Patient Acuity Sensitivity and Specificity

Alcoholic liver disease Cirrhosis FIB-4 Fibroscan NAFLD Portal hypertension Viral hepatitis

Journal

Journal of hepatology

ISSN: 1600-0641

Titre abrégé: J Hepatol

Pays: Netherlands

ID NLM: 8503886

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021

Historique:

received: 01 06 2020

revised: 19 11 2020

accepted: 22 11 2020

pubmed: 12 12 2020

medline: 1 2 2022

entrez: 11 12 2020

Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Baveno VI consensus proposed a dual liver stiffness (LS) by transient elastography threshold of <10 and >15 kPa for excluding and diagnosing compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) in the absence of other clinical signs. Herein, we aimed to validate these criteria in a real-world multicentre study. We included 5,648 patients (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 53% males) from 10 European liver centres who had a liver biopsy and LS measurement within 6 months. We included patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 2,913, 52%), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, n = 1,073, 19%), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD, n = 946, 17%) or chronic hepatitis B (n = 716, 13%). cACLD was defined as fibrosis stage ≥F3. Overall, 3,606 (66%) and 987 (18%) patients had LS <10 and >15 kPa, respectively, while cACLD was histologically confirmed in 1,772 (31%) patients. The cut-offs of <10 and >15 kPa showed 75% sensitivity and 96% specificity to exclude and diagnose cACLD, respectively. Examining the ROC curve, a more optimal dual cut-off at <7 and >12 kPa, with 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity for excluding and diagnosing cACLD (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88; p <0.001) was derived. Specifically, for ALD and NAFLD, a low cut-off of 8 kPa can be used (sensitivity=93%). For the unclassified patients, we derived a risk model based on common patient characteristics with better discrimination than LS alone (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.69; p <0.001). Instead of the Baveno VI proposed <10 and >15 kPa dual cut-offs, we found that the <8 kPa (or <7 kPa for viral hepatitis) and >12 kPa dual cut-offs have better diagnostic accuracy in cACLD. The term compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) was introduced in 2015 to describe the spectrum of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in asymptomatic patients. It was also suggested that cACLD could be diagnosed or ruled out based on specific liver stiffness values, which can be non-invasively measured by transient elastography. Herein, we assessed the suggested cut-off values and identified alternative values that offered better overall accuracy for diagnosing or ruling out cACLD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND

METHODS

We included 5,648 patients (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 53% males) from 10 European liver centres who had a liver biopsy and LS measurement within 6 months. We included patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 2,913, 52%), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, n = 1,073, 19%), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD, n = 946, 17%) or chronic hepatitis B (n = 716, 13%). cACLD was defined as fibrosis stage ≥F3.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,606 (66%) and 987 (18%) patients had LS <10 and >15 kPa, respectively, while cACLD was histologically confirmed in 1,772 (31%) patients. The cut-offs of <10 and >15 kPa showed 75% sensitivity and 96% specificity to exclude and diagnose cACLD, respectively. Examining the ROC curve, a more optimal dual cut-off at <7 and >12 kPa, with 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity for excluding and diagnosing cACLD (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88; p <0.001) was derived. Specifically, for ALD and NAFLD, a low cut-off of 8 kPa can be used (sensitivity=93%). For the unclassified patients, we derived a risk model based on common patient characteristics with better discrimination than LS alone (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.69; p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Instead of the Baveno VI proposed <10 and >15 kPa dual cut-offs, we found that the <8 kPa (or <7 kPa for viral hepatitis) and >12 kPa dual cut-offs have better diagnostic accuracy in cACLD.

LAY SUMMARY

The term compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) was introduced in 2015 to describe the spectrum of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in asymptomatic patients. It was also suggested that cACLD could be diagnosed or ruled out based on specific liver stiffness values, which can be non-invasively measured by transient elastography. Herein, we assessed the suggested cut-off values and identified alternative values that offered better overall accuracy for diagnosing or ruling out cACLD.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.050 PMID: 33307138

pubmed: 33307138

pii: S0168-8278(20)33838-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.050

pii:

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

1109-1116

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest Victor de Ledinghen reports consultancy for Echosens and SuperSonic Imagine. All other authors have nothing to disclose. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.