Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure.
Sumario de las recomendaciones y puntos clave del Consenso de las Sociedades Científicas Españolas (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENeo, SEDAR, SENP) para la utilización de la ventilación no invasiva y terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales en el paciente adulto, pediátrico y neonatal con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda grave.
Acute respiratory failure
Consenso
Consensus
High-flow therapy with nasal cannulas
Insuficiencia respiratoria aguda
Non-invasive ventilation
Recomendaciones
Recommendations
Terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales
Ventilación no invasiva
Journal
Medicina intensiva
ISSN: 2173-5727
Titre abrégé: Med Intensiva (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101717568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
25
08
2020
pubmed:
15
12
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
14
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33309463
pii: S0210-5691(20)30333-8
doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.08.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Practice Guideline
Langues
eng
spa
Pagination
298-312Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.