Medicaid prescription limits and their implications for naloxone accessibility.


Journal

Drug and alcohol dependence
ISSN: 1879-0046
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Depend
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7513587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 01 2021
Historique:
received: 19 08 2020
revised: 07 10 2020
accepted: 08 10 2020
pubmed: 15 12 2020
medline: 31 12 2020
entrez: 14 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Expanding access to and utilization of naloxone is a vitally important harm reduction strategy for preventing opioid overdose deaths, particularly in vulnerable populations like Medicaid beneficiaries. The objective of this study was to characterize the landscape of monthly prescription fill limit policies in Medicaid programs and their potential implications for expanding naloxone use for opioid overdose harm reduction. A cross-sectional, multi-modal online and telephonic data collection strategy was used to identify and describe the presence and characteristics of monthly prescription fill limit policies across state Medicaid programs. Contextual characteristics were described regarding each state's Medicaid enrollment, opioid prescribing rates, and overdose death rates. Data collection and analysis occurred between February and May 2020. Medicaid-covered naloxone fills are currently subject to monthly prescription fill limit policies in 10 state Medicaid programs, which cover 20 % of the Medicaid population nationwide. Seven of these programs are located in states ranking in the top 10 highest per-capita opioid prescribing rates in the country. However, 8 of these programs are located in states with opioid overdose death rates below the national average. Medicaid beneficiaries at high risk of opioid overdose living in states with monthly prescription fill limits may experience significant barriers to obtaining naloxone. Exempting naloxone from Medicaid prescription limit restrictions may help spur broader adoption of naloxone for opioid overdose mortality prevention, especially in states with high opioid prescribing rates. Achieving unfettered naloxone coverage in Medicaid is critical as opioid overdoses and Medicaid enrollment increase amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Expanding access to and utilization of naloxone is a vitally important harm reduction strategy for preventing opioid overdose deaths, particularly in vulnerable populations like Medicaid beneficiaries. The objective of this study was to characterize the landscape of monthly prescription fill limit policies in Medicaid programs and their potential implications for expanding naloxone use for opioid overdose harm reduction.
METHODS
A cross-sectional, multi-modal online and telephonic data collection strategy was used to identify and describe the presence and characteristics of monthly prescription fill limit policies across state Medicaid programs. Contextual characteristics were described regarding each state's Medicaid enrollment, opioid prescribing rates, and overdose death rates. Data collection and analysis occurred between February and May 2020.
RESULTS
Medicaid-covered naloxone fills are currently subject to monthly prescription fill limit policies in 10 state Medicaid programs, which cover 20 % of the Medicaid population nationwide. Seven of these programs are located in states ranking in the top 10 highest per-capita opioid prescribing rates in the country. However, 8 of these programs are located in states with opioid overdose death rates below the national average.
CONCLUSIONS
Medicaid beneficiaries at high risk of opioid overdose living in states with monthly prescription fill limits may experience significant barriers to obtaining naloxone. Exempting naloxone from Medicaid prescription limit restrictions may help spur broader adoption of naloxone for opioid overdose mortality prevention, especially in states with high opioid prescribing rates. Achieving unfettered naloxone coverage in Medicaid is critical as opioid overdoses and Medicaid enrollment increase amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33309522
pii: S0376-8716(20)30520-2
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108355
pmc: PMC7568500
mid: NIHMS1642201
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Narcotic Antagonists 0
Naloxone 36B82AMQ7N

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108355

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR002367
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R34 DA046598
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Andrew W Roberts (AW)

Department of Population Health, Department of Anesthesiology, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mailstop 1008, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: aroberts9@kumc.edu.

Kevin A Look (KA)

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA. Electronic address: kevin.look@wisc.edu.

Grace Trull (G)

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, One University Heights, CB# 2125, Asheville, NC 28804, USA. Electronic address: gratru@live.unc.edu.

Delesha M Carpenter (DM)

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, One University Heights, CB# 2125, Asheville, NC 28804, USA. Electronic address: dmcarpenter@unc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH