Health economic evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening in urban populations in China.


Journal

Cancer epidemiology
ISSN: 1877-783X
Titre abrégé: Cancer Epidemiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101508793

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 14 05 2020
revised: 02 10 2020
accepted: 15 11 2020
pubmed: 15 12 2020
medline: 13 4 2021
entrez: 14 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

On Nov 17, 2020, WHO launched a global initiative to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer through the implementation of HPV vaccination, cervical cancer screening and treatment for precancer and cancer. China has the largest burden of cervical cancer in the world, but only has a national cervical cancer screening program in rural areas since 2009. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in urban China, using Shenzhen City as an example. We use an extensively validated platform ('Policy1-Cervix'), calibrated to data from Shenzhen city and Guandong Province. We evaluated a range of strategies that have previously been implemented as pilot studies in China, or recommended as guidelines within China and globally, spanning primary HPV, cytology and co-testing strategies. We additionally considered alternate triaging methods, age ranges and screening intervals, resulting in 19 algorithms in total. Of the 19 strategies considered, the most effective approach involved primary HPV testing. At 3- to 10-yearly intervals, primary HPV testing reduced the age-standardized cancer mortality rate by 37-71 %. The most cost-effective strategy was 5-yearly primary HPV testing with partial genotyping triage for ages 25-65, discharging to 10-yearly screening for low-risk women (ICER = US$7191/QALYS using 2018 costs; willingness-to-pay threshold<1xGDP [US$9771]). This strategy gave an incidence and mortality reduction of 56 % and 63 %, respectively. This remained the most cost-effective strategy under most conditions in sensitivity analysis. Primary HPV testing would be cost-effective in Shenzhen and could more than halve cervical cancer incidence rates to 6 per 100,000 over the long term. In order to achieve rates below 4 per 100,000, the elimination threshold set by the World Health Organization, vaccination will likely also be necessary.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
On Nov 17, 2020, WHO launched a global initiative to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer through the implementation of HPV vaccination, cervical cancer screening and treatment for precancer and cancer. China has the largest burden of cervical cancer in the world, but only has a national cervical cancer screening program in rural areas since 2009. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in urban China, using Shenzhen City as an example.
METHODS
We use an extensively validated platform ('Policy1-Cervix'), calibrated to data from Shenzhen city and Guandong Province. We evaluated a range of strategies that have previously been implemented as pilot studies in China, or recommended as guidelines within China and globally, spanning primary HPV, cytology and co-testing strategies. We additionally considered alternate triaging methods, age ranges and screening intervals, resulting in 19 algorithms in total.
RESULTS
Of the 19 strategies considered, the most effective approach involved primary HPV testing. At 3- to 10-yearly intervals, primary HPV testing reduced the age-standardized cancer mortality rate by 37-71 %. The most cost-effective strategy was 5-yearly primary HPV testing with partial genotyping triage for ages 25-65, discharging to 10-yearly screening for low-risk women (ICER = US$7191/QALYS using 2018 costs; willingness-to-pay threshold<1xGDP [US$9771]). This strategy gave an incidence and mortality reduction of 56 % and 63 %, respectively. This remained the most cost-effective strategy under most conditions in sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSION
Primary HPV testing would be cost-effective in Shenzhen and could more than halve cervical cancer incidence rates to 6 per 100,000 over the long term. In order to achieve rates below 4 per 100,000, the elimination threshold set by the World Health Organization, vaccination will likely also be necessary.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33310688
pii: S1877-7821(20)30195-8
doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101861
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101861

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Adam Keane (A)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Adam.Keane@nswcc.org.au.

Ju-Fang Shi (JF)

Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Kate T Simms (KT)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Yi-Jun Liu (YJ)

School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.

Jie-Bin Lew (JB)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Carolyn Mazariego (C)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Susan Yuill (S)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Rui-Fang Wu (RF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Zhi-Hua Liu (ZH)

Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Fang-Hui Zhao (FH)

Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Jose Jeronimo (J)

Consultant for the US National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Karen Canfell (K)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

You-Lin Qiao (YL)

Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH