Cataract complications study: an analysis of adverse effects among 14,520 eyes in relation to surgical experience.

Cataract surgery complication learning-curve posterior capsule rupture zonular dialysis

Journal

Annals of translational medicine
ISSN: 2305-5839
Titre abrégé: Ann Transl Med
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101617978

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 12 2020
pubmed: 15 12 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the learning-curve in performing cataract surgery with respect to developments in technology and different teaching strategies by comparing the incidence of capsular bag-related complications to operator experience. A review of the registry of 14,520 cataract surgeries carried out at the Ophthalmology Unit of Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland, from August 8, 2009 to July 31, 2017. We identified 144 cases with posterior capsule rupture and/or loss of capsular bag support (incidence 0.99% of all surgeries). The mean age of patients was 76.9±9.1 years and gender distribution ratio 29:71 male:female. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PXF; incidence 21%) and small pupil (incidence 14%) were over-represented in complication eyes, especially at the beginning of the study. Capsular bag-related complication rates were reported in 0.36% of surgeries for senior and 7.03% for resident surgeons at the beginning of the study, compared to 0.32% and 1.32%, respectively, at the end of the study. Best-corrected visual acuity at the final post-operative visit was 0.61±0.16 decimals at the beginning of the study, and 0.81±0.19 decimals at the end of the study. The mean number of post-operative visits was 4.3±2.7 and did not show trend over the study period. Real-world evidence suggests PXF and small pupil as significant risk factors in cataract surgery. A gradual decline in the rate complications was noted with increasing surgical experience, also among residents over the follow-up period.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To evaluate the learning-curve in performing cataract surgery with respect to developments in technology and different teaching strategies by comparing the incidence of capsular bag-related complications to operator experience.
METHODS METHODS
A review of the registry of 14,520 cataract surgeries carried out at the Ophthalmology Unit of Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland, from August 8, 2009 to July 31, 2017.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 144 cases with posterior capsule rupture and/or loss of capsular bag support (incidence 0.99% of all surgeries). The mean age of patients was 76.9±9.1 years and gender distribution ratio 29:71 male:female. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PXF; incidence 21%) and small pupil (incidence 14%) were over-represented in complication eyes, especially at the beginning of the study. Capsular bag-related complication rates were reported in 0.36% of surgeries for senior and 7.03% for resident surgeons at the beginning of the study, compared to 0.32% and 1.32%, respectively, at the end of the study. Best-corrected visual acuity at the final post-operative visit was 0.61±0.16 decimals at the beginning of the study, and 0.81±0.19 decimals at the end of the study. The mean number of post-operative visits was 4.3±2.7 and did not show trend over the study period.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Real-world evidence suggests PXF and small pupil as significant risk factors in cataract surgery. A gradual decline in the rate complications was noted with increasing surgical experience, also among residents over the follow-up period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33313286
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-845
pii: atm-08-22-1541
pmc: PMC7729371
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1541

Informations de copyright

2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-845). The series “Recent developments in cataract surgery” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;93(5):416-21
pubmed: 25722080
Ophthalmology. 2017 Apr;124(4):524-531
pubmed: 28017423
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jul;33(7):1161-1170
pubmed: 30858564
Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):954-8
pubmed: 21539981
Eye (Lond). 2011 Aug;25(8):1010-5
pubmed: 21546922
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Nov;44(11):1344-1349
pubmed: 30201127
Eye (Lond). 2000 Apr;14 ( Pt 2):190-5
pubmed: 10845015
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):95-8
pubmed: 21924500
Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):11-15
pubmed: 29023268
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;200:253-254
pubmed: 30935477
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1469-1477
pubmed: 30391157
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2010 Jan-Feb;73(1):66-9
pubmed: 20464117
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Nov;35(11):1956-60
pubmed: 19878829
Eye (Lond). 2009 Jan;23(1):38-49
pubmed: 18034196
Eye (Lond). 2015 Apr;29(4):552-60
pubmed: 25679413
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1734-41
pubmed: 24160383
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;37(6):1069-75
pubmed: 21596249
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jan;24(1):66-72
pubmed: 9494901
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1377-82
pubmed: 23870438
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Sep;44(9):1109-1115
pubmed: 30078539
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;125(9):1215-9
pubmed: 17846361
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;46(1):7-10
pubmed: 27800250
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):777-81
pubmed: 23007233
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;61(11):659-62
pubmed: 24178407
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:932043
pubmed: 26075088
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):385-91
pubmed: 27063518
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013 Sep;111:24-33
pubmed: 24072944
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 15;9:1675-81
pubmed: 26396493
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;96(8):853-859
pubmed: 30284393
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jul;44(7):856-863
pubmed: 29909960
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;104(3):324-329
pubmed: 31142463
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Dec;43(12):1563-1570
pubmed: 29335101
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1994 Nov;22(4):281
pubmed: 7727109
Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar - Apr;63(2):257-267
pubmed: 28941765
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1246-1251
pubmed: 31371151
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jan - Feb;76(1):150-157
pubmed: 30131282
Med J Armed Forces India. 1998 Jul;54(3):229-231
pubmed: 28775483

Auteurs

Alexander Aaronson (A)

Helsinki Retina Research Group, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Antti Viljanen (A)

Medical Faculty, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Medilaser and Coronaria, Cor Group, Finland.

Piotr Kanclerz (P)

Hygeia Clinic, Gdańsk, Poland.

Andrzej Grzybowski (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.

Raimo Tuuminen (R)

Helsinki Retina Research Group, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Unit of Ophthalmology, Kotka, Finland.

Classifications MeSH