Ultrasound-guided targeted biopsies of CT-based radiomic tumour habitats: technical development and initial experience in metastatic ovarian cancer.
Computed tomography
Ovarian neoplasms
Radiomics
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
15
07
2020
accepted:
23
11
2020
revised:
29
09
2020
pubmed:
15
12
2020
medline:
21
5
2021
entrez:
14
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop a precision tissue sampling technique that uses computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic tumour habitats for ultrasound (US)-guided targeted biopsies that can be integrated in the clinical workflow of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Six patients with suspected HGSOC scheduled for US-guided biopsy before starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this prospective study from September 2019 to February 2020. The tumour segmentation was performed manually on the pre-biopsy contrast-enhanced CT scan. Spatial radiomic maps were used to identify tumour areas with similar or distinct radiomic patterns, and tumour habitats were identified using the Gaussian mixture modelling. CT images with superimposed habitat maps were co-registered with US images by means of a landmark-based rigid registration method for US-guided targeted biopsies. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to assess the tumour-specific CT/US fusion accuracy. We successfully co-registered CT-based radiomic tumour habitats with US images in all patients. The median time between CT scan and biopsy was 21 days (range 7-30 days). The median DSC for tumour-specific CT/US fusion accuracy was 0.53 (range 0.79 to 0.37). The CT/US fusion accuracy was high for the larger pelvic tumours (DSC: 0.76-0.79) while it was lower for the smaller omental metastases (DSC: 0.37-0.53). We developed a precision tissue sampling technique that uses radiomic habitats to guide in vivo biopsies using CT/US fusion and that can be seamlessly integrated in the clinical routine for patients with HGSOC. • We developed a prevision tissue sampling technique that co-registers CT-based radiomics-based tumour habitats with US images. • The CT/US fusion accuracy was high for the larger pelvic tumours (DSC: 0.76-0.79) while it was lower for the smaller omental metastases (DSC: 0.37-0.53).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33315123
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07560-8
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-07560-8
pmc: PMC8128813
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3765-3772Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 15601
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Marie Curie
ID : 766030
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Macintyre G, Goranova TE, De Silva D et al (2018) Copy number signatures and mutational processes in ovarian carcinoma. Nat Genet 50:1262–1270
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0179-8
Takaya H, Nakai H, Sakai K et al (2020) Intratumor heterogeneity and homologous recombination deficiency of high-grade serous ovarian cancer are associated with prognosis and molecular subtype and change in treatment course. Gynecol Oncol 156:415–422
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.013
Jiménez-Sánchez A, Memon D, Pourpe S et al (2017) Heterogeneous tumor-immune microenvironments among differentially growing metastases in an ovarian cancer patient. Cell 170:927–938.e920
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.025
Bodelon C, Killian JK, Sampson JN et al (2019) Molecular classification of epithelial ovarian cancer based on methylation profiling: evidence for survival heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res 25:5937–5946
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3720
Parkinson CA, Gale D, Piskorz AM et al (2016) Exploratory analysis of TP53 mutations in circulating tumour DNA as biomarkers of treatment response for patients with relapsed high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective study. PLoS Med 13:e1002198
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002198
Schwarz RF, Ng CK, Cooke SL et al (2015) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a phylogenetic analysis. PLoS Med 12:e1001789
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001789
Rambau PF, Vierkant RA, Intermaggio MP et al (2018) Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 4:250–261
doi: 10.1002/cjp2.109
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
Martin-Gonzalez P, Crispin-Ortuzar M, Rundo L et al (2020) Integrative radiogenomics for virtual biopsy and treatment monitoring in ovarian cancer. Insights Imaging 11:1–10
doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00895-2
Savadjiev P, Chong J, Dohan A et al (2019) Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification. Eur Radiol 29:5431–5440
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06169-w
Sala E, Mema E, Himoto Y et al (2017) Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol 72:3–10
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.013
Jiménez-Sánchez A, Cybulska P, Mager KL et al (2020) Unraveling tumor-immune heterogeneity in advanced ovarian cancer uncovers immunogenic effect of chemotherapy. Nat Genet 52:582–593
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0630-5
Vargas HA, Huang EP, Lakhman Y et al (2017) Radiogenomics of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: multireader multi-institutional study from the Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer Imaging Research Group. Radiology 285:482–492
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161870
Vargas HA, Veeraraghavan H, Micco M et al (2017) A novel representation of inter-site tumour heterogeneity from pre-treatment computed tomography textures classifies ovarian cancers by clinical outcome. Eur Radiol 27:3991–4001
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4779-y
Crispin-Ortuzar M, Gehrung M, Ursprung S et al (2020) Three-Dimensional Printed Molds for Image-Guided Surgical Biopsies: An Open Source Computational Platform. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.20.00026
Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059
Ewertsen C, Henriksen BM, Torp-Pedersen S, Bachmann Nielsen M (2011) Characterization by biopsy or CEUS of liver lesions guided by image fusion between ultrasonography and CT, PET/CT or MRI. Ultraschall Med 32:191–197
doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245921
Puech P, Rouvière O, Renard-Penna R et al (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469
doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121501
Mauri G, Cova L, De Beni S et al (2015) Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:143–151
doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0897-y
Rundo L, Beer L, Ursprung S et al (2020) Tissue-specific and interpretable sub-segmentation of whole tumour burden on CT images by unsupervised fuzzy clustering. Comput Biol Med 120:103751
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103751
Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67:786–804
doi: 10.1109/PROC.1979.11328
Lu CF, Hsu FT, Hsieh KL et al (2018) Machine learning-based radiomics for molecular subtyping of gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 24:4429–4436
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3445
Beer L, Sahin H, Bateman NW et al (2020) Integration of proteomics with CT-based qualitative and radiomic features in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients: an exploratory analysis. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06755-3
Griffin N, Grant LA, Freeman SJ et al (2009) Image-guided biopsy in patients with suspected ovarian carcinoma: a safe and effective technique? Eur Radiol 19:230–235
doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1121-8