Health Research and Social Justice Philosophy.

bioethics health equity health justice research ethics social justice

Journal

The Hastings Center report
ISSN: 1552-146X
Titre abrégé: Hastings Cent Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0410447

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 12 2020
pubmed: 15 12 2020
medline: 4 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Situating medical and scientific research within a framework or theory of social justice is long overdue. Attempting to extend principles of research ethics beyond the clinic and lab to other affected people or consequences tolerates or obfuscates injustice. While it must be done, the timescales, methodologies, and commitment to real-world impact are quite different in research ethics versus political philosophy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33315258
doi: 10.1002/hast.1197
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

39-40

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Hastings Center.

Références

J. Herington and S. Tanona, “The Social Risks of Science,” Hastings Center Report 50, no. 6 (2020): 27-38.
F. Rivera-Castro, “Circumstances of Justice,” in The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, ed. J. Mandle and D. Reidy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 92-96.
Herington and Tanona, “The Social Risks of Science,” 32.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH