Impact of scaling up dolutegravir on antiretroviral resistance in South Africa: A modeling study.
Drug Resistance, Viral
Drug Substitution
Female
HIV Infections
/ diagnosis
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
HIV-1
/ drug effects
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Models, Theoretical
Oxazines
/ adverse effects
Piperazines
/ adverse effects
Pyridones
/ adverse effects
South Africa
/ epidemiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
27
09
2019
accepted:
10
11
2020
entrez:
14
12
2020
pubmed:
15
12
2020
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rising resistance of HIV-1 to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) threatens the success of the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The switch to WHO-recommended dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens could reduce this threat due to DTG's high genetic barrier to resistance. We used mathematical modeling to predict the impact of the scale-up of DTG-based ART on NNRTI pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) in South Africa, 2020 to 2040. We adapted the Modeling Antiretroviral drug Resistance In South Africa (MARISA) model, an epidemiological model of the transmission of NNRTI resistance in South Africa. We modeled the introduction of DTG in 2020 under 2 scenarios: DTG as first-line regimen for ART initiators, or DTG for all patients, including patients on suppressive NNRTI-based ART. Given the safety concerns related to DTG during pregnancy, we assessed the impact of prescribing DTG to all men and in addition to (1) women beyond reproductive age; (2) women beyond reproductive age or using contraception; and (3) all women. The model projections show that, compared to the continuation of NNRTI-based ART, introducing DTG would lead to a reduction in NNRTI PDR in all scenarios if ART initiators are started on a DTG-based regimen, and those on NNRTI-based regimens are rapidly switched to DTG. NNRTI PDR would continue to increase if DTG-based ART was restricted to men. When given to all men and women, DTG-based ART could reduce the level of NNRTI PDR from 52.4% (without DTG) to 10.4% (with universal DTG) in 2040. If only men and women beyond reproductive age or on contraception are started on or switched to DTG-based ART, NNRTI PDR would reach 25.9% in 2040. Limitations include substantial uncertainty due to the long-term predictions and the current scarcity of knowledge about DTG efficacy in South Africa. Our model shows the potential benefit of scaling up DTG-based regimens for halting the rise of NNRTI resistance. Starting or switching all men and women to DTG would lead to a sustained decline in resistance levels, whereas using DTG-based ART in all men, or in men and women beyond childbearing age, would only slow down the increase in levels of NNRTI PDR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rising resistance of HIV-1 to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) threatens the success of the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The switch to WHO-recommended dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens could reduce this threat due to DTG's high genetic barrier to resistance. We used mathematical modeling to predict the impact of the scale-up of DTG-based ART on NNRTI pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) in South Africa, 2020 to 2040.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We adapted the Modeling Antiretroviral drug Resistance In South Africa (MARISA) model, an epidemiological model of the transmission of NNRTI resistance in South Africa. We modeled the introduction of DTG in 2020 under 2 scenarios: DTG as first-line regimen for ART initiators, or DTG for all patients, including patients on suppressive NNRTI-based ART. Given the safety concerns related to DTG during pregnancy, we assessed the impact of prescribing DTG to all men and in addition to (1) women beyond reproductive age; (2) women beyond reproductive age or using contraception; and (3) all women. The model projections show that, compared to the continuation of NNRTI-based ART, introducing DTG would lead to a reduction in NNRTI PDR in all scenarios if ART initiators are started on a DTG-based regimen, and those on NNRTI-based regimens are rapidly switched to DTG. NNRTI PDR would continue to increase if DTG-based ART was restricted to men. When given to all men and women, DTG-based ART could reduce the level of NNRTI PDR from 52.4% (without DTG) to 10.4% (with universal DTG) in 2040. If only men and women beyond reproductive age or on contraception are started on or switched to DTG-based ART, NNRTI PDR would reach 25.9% in 2040. Limitations include substantial uncertainty due to the long-term predictions and the current scarcity of knowledge about DTG efficacy in South Africa.
CONCLUSIONS
Our model shows the potential benefit of scaling up DTG-based regimens for halting the rise of NNRTI resistance. Starting or switching all men and women to DTG would lead to a sustained decline in resistance levels, whereas using DTG-based ART in all men, or in men and women beyond childbearing age, would only slow down the increase in levels of NNRTI PDR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33315863
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003397
pii: PMEDICINE-D-19-03520
pmc: PMC7735592
doi:
Substances chimiques
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Oxazines
0
Piperazines
0
Pyridones
0
dolutegravir
DKO1W9H7M1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1003397Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI069924
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: HFG has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from ViiV, Gilead Sciences, Sandoz and Mepha. ME is a member of the Editorial Board of PLOS Medicine. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Biomed Comput. 1988 Oct;23(1-2):97-112
pubmed: 3065249
Lancet HIV. 2018 Mar;5(3):e146-e154
pubmed: 29174084
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Mar 18;9:26-34
pubmed: 31143879
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):816-826
pubmed: 31339676
Drugs. 2012 Jun 18;72(9):e1-25
pubmed: 22686620
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Jul;22(7):e25324
pubmed: 31294931
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 24;15(6):e1007083
pubmed: 31233494
J Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;215(9):1362-1365
pubmed: 28329236
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):e246-e252
pubmed: 30902440
AIDS. 2019 Sep 1;33(11):1797-1799
pubmed: 31149946
Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Dec;91(8):615-20
pubmed: 26056389
PLoS Pathog. 2018 Feb 20;14(2):e1006895
pubmed: 29462208
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):803-815
pubmed: 31339677
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):210-219
pubmed: 27659733
PLoS Med. 2017 Dec 12;14(12):e1002468
pubmed: 29232366
F1000Res. 2018 Aug 30;7:1359
pubmed: 30271590
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):827-840
pubmed: 31329379
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Mar 23;11(3):e1004722
pubmed: 25798934
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1256-64
pubmed: 21593078
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):614-625
pubmed: 30934067
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 3:39-51
pubmed: 27421051
J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1;212(1):28-38
pubmed: 25576600