Contraceptive Use Among Women With End-Stage Kidney Disease on Dialysis in the United States.

Rates contraception dialysis end-stage kidney disease race/ethnicity

Journal

Kidney medicine
ISSN: 2590-0595
Titre abrégé: Kidney Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101756300

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 15 12 2020
pubmed: 16 12 2020
medline: 16 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) adversely affects fertility, pregnancies can occur among women receiving dialysis. ESKD increases the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and little is known about contraceptive use in women undergoing dialysis. Retrospective cohort study. Using the US Renal Data System covering January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2014, we evaluated for each calendar year women who for the entire year were aged 15 to 44 years, receiving dialysis, and with Medicare as the primary payer. Age, race/ethnicity, and calendar year of prevalent ESKD. Contraceptive use. We determined rates of contraceptive use and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with contraceptive use. The study cohort included 35,732 women and represented 115,713 person-years. The rate of contraceptive use was 5.30% of person-years (95% CI, 5.17%-5.42%). Overall, contraceptive use increased from 2005 to 2014 (4.21%; 95% CI, 3.84%-4.59% vs 6.54%, 95% CI, 6.10%-6.99%). Compared with women aged 25 to 29 years, contraceptive use was higher in women aged 15 to 24 years (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.18-1.43) and lower in women aged 30 to 34 years (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81), 35 to 39 years (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.42-0.50), and 40 to 44 years (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27-0.34). Compared with White women, contraceptive use was higher in Black (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.24) and Native American women (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.25-2.05). Women with ESKD due to glomerulonephritis had a higher likelihood of contraceptive use than women with ESKD due to diabetes (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42). Women receiving peritoneal dialysis had a lower likelihood of contraceptive use than women receiving hemodialysis (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93). Compared with women without predialysis nephrology care, contraceptive use was higher in women who received predialysis nephrology care for 12 or fewer months (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.37) and more than 12 months (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.47). Retrospective design and use of administrative data. Among women with ESKD undergoing dialysis, contraceptive use remains low at 5.30%. Younger age, Native American and Black race/ethnicity, ESKD due to glomerulonephritis, hemodialysis, and predialysis nephrology care are associated with a higher likelihood of contraceptive use. The study highlights the importance of prepregnancy counseling for contraceptive use in women receiving dialysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33319196
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.08.010
pii: S2590-0595(20)30209-0
pmc: PMC7729239
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

707-715.e1

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Références

Contracept Reprod Med. 2018 Sep 20;3:12
pubmed: 30250748
Kidney Int. 2016 May;89(5):995-1007
pubmed: 27083278
Semin Nephrol. 2017 Jul;37(4):327-336
pubmed: 28711071
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186651
pubmed: 29040342
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013 Jul 01;10:1e
pubmed: 23861675
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 03;8(2):
pubmed: 30717445
Hemodial Int. 2014 Apr;18(2):507-15
pubmed: 24400842
Nephrology (Carlton). 2013 Apr;18(4):276-84
pubmed: 23441694
Clin Kidney J. 2017 Apr;10(2):276-281
pubmed: 28396746
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 May;29(5):685-90
pubmed: 9159301
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007 Apr;14(2):126-31
pubmed: 17395115
Semin Dial. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):634-9
pubmed: 22122666
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2437-2448
pubmed: 31554657
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 03;16:E03
pubmed: 30605421
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug;26(8):2011-22
pubmed: 25766536
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May - Jun;28(3):219-223
pubmed: 29544988
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jul;56(1):5-6
pubmed: 20620681
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):62-71
pubmed: 19965547
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Nov;25(11):2649-57
pubmed: 24925723
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul;66(1):55-9
pubmed: 25600490
Kidney Int. 2017 May;91(5):1047-1056
pubmed: 28209334

Auteurs

Silvi Shah (S)

Division of Nephrology, Kidney C.A.R.E. (Clinical Advancement, Research and Education) Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Annette L Christianson (AL)

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Charuhas V Thakar (CV)

Division of Nephrology, Kidney C.A.R.E. (Clinical Advancement, Research and Education) Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Cincinnati Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

Samantha Kramer (S)

Division of Nephrology, Kidney C.A.R.E. (Clinical Advancement, Research and Education) Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Karthikeyan Meganathan (K)

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Anthony C Leonard (AC)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Classifications MeSH