Souvenaid for Alzheimer's disease.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 12 2020
Historique:
entrez: 15 12 2020
pubmed: 16 12 2020
medline: 16 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Souvenaid is a dietary supplement with a patented composition (Fortasyn Connect™)which is intended to be used by people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). It has been designed to support the formation and function of synapses in the brain, which are thought to be strongly correlated with cognitive function. If effective, it might improve symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and also prevent the progression from prodromal Alzheimer's disease to dementia. We sought in this review to examine the evidence for this proposition. To assess the effects of Souvenaid on incidence of dementia, cognition, functional performance, and safety in people with Alzheimer's disease. We searched ALOIS, i.e. the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Web of Science (ISI Web of Science), Cinahl (EBSCOhost), Lilacs (BIREME), and clinical trials registries up to 24 June 2020. We also reviewed citations of reference lists of landmark papers, reviews, and included studies for additional studies and assessed their suitability for inclusion in the review. We included randomised, placebo-controlled trials which evaluated Souvenaid in people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (also termed prodromal AD) or with dementia due to AD, and with a treatment duration of at least 16 weeks. Our primary outcome measures were incidence of dementia, global and specific cognitive function, functional performance, combined cognitive-functional outcomes and adverse events. We selected studies, extracted data, assessed the quality of trials and intended to conduct meta-analyses according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We rated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We present all outcomes grouped by stage of AD. We included three randomised, placebo-controlled trials investigating Souvenaid in 1097 community-dwelling participants with Alzheimer's disease. One study each included participants with prodromal AD, mild AD dementia and mild-to-moderate AD dementia. We rated the risks of bias of all trials as low. One study (in prodromal AD) was funded by European grants. The other two studies were funded by the manufacturer of Souvenaid. One trial investigated the incidence of dementia in people with prodromal AD at baseline, and found little to no difference between the Souvenaid group and the placebo group after 24 months (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; 1 trial, 311 participants; moderate quality of evidence). In prodromal AD, and in mild and mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia, Souvenaid probably results in little or no difference in global or specific cognitive functions (moderate quality of evidence). Everyday function, or the ability to perform activities of daily living, were measured in mild and mild-to-moderate AD dementia. Neither study found evidence of a difference between the groups after 24 weeks of treatment (moderate quality of evidence). Two studies investigated combined cognitive-functional outcomes with the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and observed conflicting results. Souvenaid probably results in slight improvement, which is below estimates of meaningful change, in participants with prodromal Alzheimer's disease after 24 months (moderate quality of evidence), but probably has little to no effect in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia after 24 weeks (moderate quality of evidence). Adverse effects observed were low in all trials, and the available data were insufficient to determine any connection with Souvenaid. Two years of treatment with Souvenaid probably does not reduce the risk of progression to dementia in people with prodromal AD. There is no convincing evidence that Souvenaid affects other outcomes important to people with AD in the prodromal stage or mild-to-moderate stages of dementia. Conflicting evidence on combined cognitive-functional outcomes in prodromal AD and mild AD dementia warrants further investigation. Adverse effects of Souvenaid seem to be uncommon, but the evidence synthesised in this review does not permit us to make a definitive statement on the long-term tolerability of Souvenaid. The effects of Souvenaid in more severe AD dementia or in people with AD at risk of nutritional deficiencies remain unclear.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Souvenaid is a dietary supplement with a patented composition (Fortasyn Connect™)which is intended to be used by people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). It has been designed to support the formation and function of synapses in the brain, which are thought to be strongly correlated with cognitive function. If effective, it might improve symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and also prevent the progression from prodromal Alzheimer's disease to dementia. We sought in this review to examine the evidence for this proposition.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of Souvenaid on incidence of dementia, cognition, functional performance, and safety in people with Alzheimer's disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched ALOIS, i.e. the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), Web of Science (ISI Web of Science), Cinahl (EBSCOhost), Lilacs (BIREME), and clinical trials registries up to 24 June 2020. We also reviewed citations of reference lists of landmark papers, reviews, and included studies for additional studies and assessed their suitability for inclusion in the review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised, placebo-controlled trials which evaluated Souvenaid in people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (also termed prodromal AD) or with dementia due to AD, and with a treatment duration of at least 16 weeks.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Our primary outcome measures were incidence of dementia, global and specific cognitive function, functional performance, combined cognitive-functional outcomes and adverse events. We selected studies, extracted data, assessed the quality of trials and intended to conduct meta-analyses according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We rated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We present all outcomes grouped by stage of AD.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three randomised, placebo-controlled trials investigating Souvenaid in 1097 community-dwelling participants with Alzheimer's disease. One study each included participants with prodromal AD, mild AD dementia and mild-to-moderate AD dementia. We rated the risks of bias of all trials as low. One study (in prodromal AD) was funded by European grants. The other two studies were funded by the manufacturer of Souvenaid. One trial investigated the incidence of dementia in people with prodromal AD at baseline, and found little to no difference between the Souvenaid group and the placebo group after 24 months (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; 1 trial, 311 participants; moderate quality of evidence). In prodromal AD, and in mild and mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia, Souvenaid probably results in little or no difference in global or specific cognitive functions (moderate quality of evidence). Everyday function, or the ability to perform activities of daily living, were measured in mild and mild-to-moderate AD dementia. Neither study found evidence of a difference between the groups after 24 weeks of treatment (moderate quality of evidence). Two studies investigated combined cognitive-functional outcomes with the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and observed conflicting results. Souvenaid probably results in slight improvement, which is below estimates of meaningful change, in participants with prodromal Alzheimer's disease after 24 months (moderate quality of evidence), but probably has little to no effect in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia after 24 weeks (moderate quality of evidence). Adverse effects observed were low in all trials, and the available data were insufficient to determine any connection with Souvenaid.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Two years of treatment with Souvenaid probably does not reduce the risk of progression to dementia in people with prodromal AD. There is no convincing evidence that Souvenaid affects other outcomes important to people with AD in the prodromal stage or mild-to-moderate stages of dementia. Conflicting evidence on combined cognitive-functional outcomes in prodromal AD and mild AD dementia warrants further investigation. Adverse effects of Souvenaid seem to be uncommon, but the evidence synthesised in this review does not permit us to make a definitive statement on the long-term tolerability of Souvenaid. The effects of Souvenaid in more severe AD dementia or in people with AD at risk of nutritional deficiencies remain unclear.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33320335
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011679.pub2
pmc: PMC8094446
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fortasyn Connect 0
Phospholipids 0
Placebos 0
Docosahexaenoic Acids 25167-62-8
Eicosapentaenoic Acid AAN7QOV9EA

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD011679

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400
pubmed: 21194891
Arch Neurol. 2012 Oct;69(10):1318-25
pubmed: 22801742
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013 Nov 26;5(6):59
pubmed: 24280255
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29
pubmed: 24849862
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(2):471-80
pubmed: 25322923
Alzheimers Dement. 2010 Jan;6(1):1-10.e1
pubmed: 20129316
Brain. 2013 Dec;136(Pt 12):3738-52
pubmed: 24136825
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92
pubmed: 21514248
Arch Neurol. 2008 Aug;65(8):1091-5
pubmed: 18695059
Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1323-9
pubmed: 17846273
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9
pubmed: 18177782
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Jul;10(4):485-502
pubmed: 24144963
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2275-7
pubmed: 24283198
Neurology. 2007 May 1;68(18):1501-8
pubmed: 17470753
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S22-32
pubmed: 9236949
Nutr Neurosci. 2017 May;20(4):219-227
pubmed: 26638900
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):33-44
pubmed: 24381967
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9
pubmed: 21514249
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 15;12:CD011679
pubmed: 33320335
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Aug;6(8):734-46
pubmed: 17616482
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 02;5(4):e005247
pubmed: 25838501
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S33-9
pubmed: 9236950
Arch Neurol. 1999 Mar;56(3):303-8
pubmed: 10190820
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):257-62
pubmed: 21514247
J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31(1):225-36
pubmed: 22766770
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2001 Jan-Feb;12(1):1-14
pubmed: 11125236
Neurology. 2014 Jul 29;83(5):434-40
pubmed: 24951474
J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Aug;15(8):720-4
pubmed: 21968871
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jan;4(1 Suppl 1):S153-68
pubmed: 18631994
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;(6):CD008782
pubmed: 24913723
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Sep 27;5:492-500
pubmed: 31650005
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):329-44
pubmed: 20107219
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Mar;12(3):292-323
pubmed: 27012484
Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):436-50
pubmed: 18420157
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;83(2):171-3
pubmed: 22019547
Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):397-404
pubmed: 21263141
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Aug 02;5:354-363
pubmed: 31417957
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Apr;71(4):505-8
pubmed: 24493463
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
pubmed: 6496779
Neurology. 2014 Oct 7;83(15):1359-65
pubmed: 25253756
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Dec;16(12):965-975
pubmed: 29097166
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Apr;(193):1-727
pubmed: 21500874
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 11;4:CD009002
pubmed: 27063583
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):536-46
pubmed: 19187414
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2019;6(4):232-236
pubmed: 31686094
BMJ. 2016 Feb 01;352:i157
pubmed: 26830668
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Aug;15(8):672-6
pubmed: 21968863
Nutrition. 2013 Sep;29(9):1080-9
pubmed: 23756280
Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Sep-Oct;53(5):471-81
pubmed: 10500855

Auteurs

Marion Burckhardt (M)

SRH University of Applied Health Sciences, Gera, Germany.

Stefan Watzke (S)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Andreas Wienke (A)

Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Gero Langer (G)

Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Astrid Fink (A)

Institute for Medical Sociology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH