Factors Influencing Patients' Initial Decisions Regarding Telepsychiatry Participation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Telephone-Based Survey.
COVID-19
United States
decision making
mental health
telehealth
telephone visit
telepsychiatry
video visit
virtual care
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 12 2020
22 12 2020
Historique:
received:
03
11
2020
accepted:
12
12
2020
revised:
03
12
2020
pubmed:
16
12
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
entrez:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Telepsychiatry enables patients to establish or maintain psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the factors influencing patients' initial decisions to participate in telepsychiatry in the midst of a public health crisis. This paper seeks to examine factors influencing patients' initial decisions to accept or decline telepsychiatry immediately after the stay-at-home order in Michigan, their initial choice of virtual care modality (video or telephone), and their anticipated participation in telepsychiatry once clinics reopen for in-person visits. Between June and August 2020, we conducted a telephone-based survey using a questionnaire comprising 14 quantitative and two qualitative items as part of a quality improvement initiative. We targeted patients who had an in-person appointment date that fell in the first few weeks following the Michigan governor's stay-at-home order, necessitating conversion to virtual visits or deferment of in-person care. We used descriptive statistics to report individual survey responses and assess the association between chosen visit type and patient characteristics and future participation in telepsychiatry using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 244 patients whose original in-person appointments were scheduled within the first 3 weeks of the stay-at-home order in Michigan completed the telephone survey. The majority of the 244 respondents (n=202, 82.8%) initially chose to receive psychiatric care through video visits, while 13.5% (n=33) chose telephone visits and 1.2% (n=3) decided to postpone care until in-person visit availability. Patient age correlated with chosen visit type (P<.001; 95% CI 0.02-0.06). Patients aged ≥44 years were more likely than patients aged 0-44 years to opt for telephone visits (relative risk reduction [RRR] 1.2; 95% CI 1.06-1.35). Patient sex (P=.99), race (P=.06), type of insurance (P=.08), and number of previous visits to the clinic (P=.63) were not statistically relevant. Half of the respondents (132/244, 54.1%) stated they were likely to continue with telepsychiatry even after in-person visits were made available. Telephone visit users were less likely than video visit users to anticipate future participation in telepsychiatry (RRR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.2). Overall, virtual visits met or exceeded expectations for the majority of users. In this cohort, patient age correlates with the choice of virtual visit type, with older adults more likely to choose telephone visits over video visits. Understanding challenges to patient-facing technologies can help advance health equity and guide best practices for engaging patients and families through telehealth.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Telepsychiatry enables patients to establish or maintain psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the factors influencing patients' initial decisions to participate in telepsychiatry in the midst of a public health crisis.
OBJECTIVE
This paper seeks to examine factors influencing patients' initial decisions to accept or decline telepsychiatry immediately after the stay-at-home order in Michigan, their initial choice of virtual care modality (video or telephone), and their anticipated participation in telepsychiatry once clinics reopen for in-person visits.
METHODS
Between June and August 2020, we conducted a telephone-based survey using a questionnaire comprising 14 quantitative and two qualitative items as part of a quality improvement initiative. We targeted patients who had an in-person appointment date that fell in the first few weeks following the Michigan governor's stay-at-home order, necessitating conversion to virtual visits or deferment of in-person care. We used descriptive statistics to report individual survey responses and assess the association between chosen visit type and patient characteristics and future participation in telepsychiatry using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS
A total of 244 patients whose original in-person appointments were scheduled within the first 3 weeks of the stay-at-home order in Michigan completed the telephone survey. The majority of the 244 respondents (n=202, 82.8%) initially chose to receive psychiatric care through video visits, while 13.5% (n=33) chose telephone visits and 1.2% (n=3) decided to postpone care until in-person visit availability. Patient age correlated with chosen visit type (P<.001; 95% CI 0.02-0.06). Patients aged ≥44 years were more likely than patients aged 0-44 years to opt for telephone visits (relative risk reduction [RRR] 1.2; 95% CI 1.06-1.35). Patient sex (P=.99), race (P=.06), type of insurance (P=.08), and number of previous visits to the clinic (P=.63) were not statistically relevant. Half of the respondents (132/244, 54.1%) stated they were likely to continue with telepsychiatry even after in-person visits were made available. Telephone visit users were less likely than video visit users to anticipate future participation in telepsychiatry (RRR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.2). Overall, virtual visits met or exceeded expectations for the majority of users.
CONCLUSIONS
In this cohort, patient age correlates with the choice of virtual visit type, with older adults more likely to choose telephone visits over video visits. Understanding challenges to patient-facing technologies can help advance health equity and guide best practices for engaging patients and families through telehealth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33320823
pii: v4i12e25469
doi: 10.2196/25469
pmc: PMC7758083
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e25469Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
©Jennifer Severe, Ruiqi Tang, Faith Horbatch, Regina Onishchenko, Vidisha Naini, Mary Carol Blazek. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 22.12.2020.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 06;20(4):e123
pubmed: 29625950
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 7;6(2):e18961
pubmed: 32250963
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1386-1389
pubmed: 32744601
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):551-559
pubmed: 30192211
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205873
pubmed: 32585018
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 16;8(10):e20419
pubmed: 33006942
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2461-2473.e3
pubmed: 32603900
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 26;19(5):e177
pubmed: 28550006
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Nov 1;71(11):1143-1150
pubmed: 32933411
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12
pubmed: 29320966
Acta Inform Med. 2017 Dec;25(4):240-246
pubmed: 29284913
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep - Oct;66:89-95
pubmed: 32750604
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Sep 18;7(9):e20157
pubmed: 32525485
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Apr 9;32(2):321-337
pubmed: 29624133
World J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 22;5(3):286-304
pubmed: 26425443
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):119-125
pubmed: 32894772
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 8;7(6):e13772
pubmed: 31199332
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):654-657
pubmed: 30892583
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;37(4):250-255
pubmed: 32434596