Development and Field Validation of Lidocaine-Loaded Castration Bands for Bovine Pain Mitigation.
animal welfare
bovine
castration
elastration
lidocaine
pain mitigation
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Dec 2020
10 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
06
11
2020
revised:
04
12
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
entrez:
16
12
2020
pubmed:
17
12
2020
medline:
17
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Castration is among the most common management procedures performed in the dairy and beef cattle industries and is mainly performed by surgery or elastic banding. Despite the various benefits of castration, all methods produce pain and distress. Castration by banding is simple, inexpensive, produces fewer complications, and can be performed in a high-throughput manner. Because lidocaine, a local anesthetic, can be delivered to trauma sites topically, we have formulated lidocaine-loaded castration bands (LLBs) to deliver local pain relief to calves during banded castration. The initial lidocaine content of three band types developed was between 80 and 200 mg per band. The transfer kinetics of lidocaine into tissue was determined in vitro, indicating a rapid release for the first 30 min, followed by a slow release lasting at least 48 h. Furthermore, the lidocaine delivery and pain mitigation effects of these LLBs were compared to standard lidocaine injections in vivo. Field studies indicated that LLBs performed at least as well as lidocaine injections for short-term lidocaine delivery into tissues and pain mitigation. Moreover, LLBs significantly outperformed lidocaine injections for long-term delivery and pain mitigation. The concentrations of lidocaine in the LLB-treated tissue samples were generally in the range of 0.5-3.5 mg of lidocaine per gram of tissue and were overall highest after 6 h. Lidocaine-loaded elastration bands deliver therapeutic quantities of lidocaine into scrotal tissues over a period of at least seven days in cattle. This approach would provide long-term pain mitigation to the animals and, by avoiding surgery or the administration of injections, would also decrease the time and handling costs for the producer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33321859
pii: ani10122363
doi: 10.3390/ani10122363
pmc: PMC7763166
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 531133-18
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 538474-19
Organisme : Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Strategic Research and Develop Program
ID : 2018R033R
Organisme : Canadian Advancing Agriculture Program
ID : P074
Références
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Jun 13;12(1):102
pubmed: 27295955
J Control Release. 2003 Mar 7;88(2):277-85
pubmed: 12628334
Res Vet Sci. 2002 Aug;73(1):61-70
pubmed: 12208108
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0207289
pubmed: 30500846
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6429-6441
pubmed: 28551190
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Mar 15;238(6):755-67
pubmed: 21401433
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;75(7):1363-1366
pubmed: 28153755
Anesth Prog. 2016 Spring;63(1):17-24
pubmed: 26866407
Am J Vet Res. 1985 Nov;46(11):2388-92
pubmed: 4073651
BMC Vet Res. 2010 Mar 03;6:12
pubmed: 20199669
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jun 18;15(6):14513-25
pubmed: 26094632
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1035-1043
pubmed: 29863605
Animals (Basel). 2017 Sep 28;7(10):
pubmed: 28956843
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012 Jul;39(4):431-5
pubmed: 22524418
Animal. 2018 Nov;12(11):2373-2381
pubmed: 29477153
Res Vet Sci. 2017 Oct;114:430-443
pubmed: 28755556
Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Feb 15;4(1):e15444
pubmed: 24660158