Evaluation of amblyopic eyes with optical coherence tomography angiography and electrophysiological tests.
Amblyopia
electroretinography
optical coherence tomographic angiography
retina
visual evoked potential
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
16
12
2020
pubmed:
17
12
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the structural and functional changes of the retina and optic nerve in amblyopia. Eighteen patients with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia and 27 age-matched healthy controls were involved in this study. All patients underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and flash electroretinogram (fERG). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), perifoveal superficial density, whole superficial density, parafoveal deep density, perifoveal deep density among the eyes (P > 0 0.05). Significant differences were found only in superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vessel density in whole (P = 0.029) and parafoveal (P = 0.008) image. In electrophysiological tests, while VEP latencies of the amblyopic eyes increased compared to nonamblyopic eyes and controls (P = 0.027), VEP amplitudes decreased in amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes compared to controls (P = 0.01), amplitudes of the rod (P = 0.027) and cones (P < 0.001) also decreased in amblyopic eyes compared to nonamblyopic and healthy eyes. When we assessed the correlation between the parameters of OCTA and electrophysiological test, only a significant correlation was found between parafoveal SCP vessel density and VEP amplitudes (r = 0.341). We found a significant decrease only in SCP vessel density of the OCTA parameters in amblyopic eyes compared to healthy eyes. We detected a significant relationship between parafoveal SCP vessel density and VEP parameters, which might be associated with the underlying pathophysiology of the amblyopia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33323589
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2021_69_1_105_303300
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2319_19
pmc: PMC7926137
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105-110Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Exp Brain Res. 1979 May 2;35(3):559-82
pubmed: 456457
Curr Eye Res. 2013 Jul;38(7):802-9
pubmed: 23521720
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1980 Spring;20(1):251-68
pubmed: 6995378
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1984 Aug;62(4):643-50
pubmed: 6485759
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;126(11):1500-6
pubmed: 19001216
J Physiol. 1975 Jul;248(3):663-716
pubmed: 1151843
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;148(4):551-557.e2
pubmed: 19573859
Doc Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;133(1):1-9
pubmed: 27443562
Ophthalmology. 1984 Jun;91(6):603-12
pubmed: 6462623
Int Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;33(5):515-9
pubmed: 23417145
Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;130(1):1-12
pubmed: 25502644
Clin Exp Optom. 2001 Nov;84(6):321-336
pubmed: 12366358
J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1041-59
pubmed: 5883731
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5780-5787
pubmed: 27792812
Vestn Oftalmol. 2008 Jul-Aug;124(4):32-6
pubmed: 18756798
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 1;135(10):1086-1091
pubmed: 28910439
Open Ophthalmol J. 2009 Apr 20;3:10-4
pubmed: 19554221
Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;128(2):101-9
pubmed: 24343574
J AAPOS. 2018 Aug;22(4):286-289.e2
pubmed: 30031875
Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):2315-25
pubmed: 21940051
J AAPOS. 2017 Jun;21(3):224-228
pubmed: 28501447
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 6;2018:1967621
pubmed: 30159164
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R936-R940
pubmed: 25247373
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):364-70
pubmed: 11914722