Effectiveness of health consumer representative involvement in implementation of interventions to change health professional behaviour.

behaviour change consumer health professionals implementation systematic review

Journal

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 06 08 2020
revised: 19 10 2020
accepted: 03 12 2020
pubmed: 17 12 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 16 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The adoption of research evidence to improve client outcomes may be enhanced using the principles of implementation science. This systematic review aimed to understand the effect of involving consumers to change health professional behaviours and practices. The barriers and enablers to consumer engagement will also be examined. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PDQ-Evidence from 2004 to February 2019. Implementation studies involving consumers in at least one phase (development, intervention or facilitation) of an intervention that aimed to change health professional behaviour to align with evidence-based practice were included. Studies in the areas of paediatrics and primary care were excluded. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, and one author extracted data and conducted quality assessments with review of a second author. Knowledge translation interventions were categorized using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy. The primary outcome was measures of change in health professional behaviour. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of three studies found support for consumer involvement in changing healthcare professionals' behaviour (Hedges' g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.27, 0.57], P < 0.001). Most knowledge translation studies involved consumers during the development phase only (n = 12). Most studies (n = 9) included one type of knowledge translation intervention. Professional interventions (including education of health professionals, educational outreach, and audit and feedback) were described in 13 studies. Consumer involvement rarely moves beyond the design phase of knowledge translation research in healthcare settings. Further research of the barriers to and effect of increased consumer engagement across all stages of knowledge translation interventions is needed. PROSPERO CRD42019119179.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The adoption of research evidence to improve client outcomes may be enhanced using the principles of implementation science. This systematic review aimed to understand the effect of involving consumers to change health professional behaviours and practices. The barriers and enablers to consumer engagement will also be examined.
METHODS METHODS
We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PDQ-Evidence from 2004 to February 2019. Implementation studies involving consumers in at least one phase (development, intervention or facilitation) of an intervention that aimed to change health professional behaviour to align with evidence-based practice were included. Studies in the areas of paediatrics and primary care were excluded. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, and one author extracted data and conducted quality assessments with review of a second author. Knowledge translation interventions were categorized using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy. The primary outcome was measures of change in health professional behaviour.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of three studies found support for consumer involvement in changing healthcare professionals' behaviour (Hedges' g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.27, 0.57], P < 0.001). Most knowledge translation studies involved consumers during the development phase only (n = 12). Most studies (n = 9) included one type of knowledge translation intervention. Professional interventions (including education of health professionals, educational outreach, and audit and feedback) were described in 13 studies.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Consumer involvement rarely moves beyond the design phase of knowledge translation research in healthcare settings. Further research of the barriers to and effect of increased consumer engagement across all stages of knowledge translation interventions is needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD42019119179.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33325521
pii: 6039076
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa164
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Jodi Oakman (J)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Liana S Cahill (LS)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3065, Australia.
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne University, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

Samantha Clune (S)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Cheryl Neilson (C)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Nora Shields (N)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Tamara Tse (T)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne University, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

Sophie O'keefe (S)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alfred Health, Melbourne 3009, Australia.

Margarita Frederico (M)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Marnie Graco (M)

Alfred Health, Melbourne 3009, Australia.

Anne E Holland (AE)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alfred Health, Melbourne 3009, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Laura Jolliffe (L)

Alfred Health, Melbourne 3009, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Leeanne Carey (L)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne University, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

Virginia Lewis (V)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Graham Brown (G)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Narelle Cox (N)

Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Meg E Morris (ME)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Healthscope, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Natasha A Lannin (NA)

La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alfred Health, Melbourne 3009, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH