Deep learning networks reflect cytoarchitectonic features used in brain mapping.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 12 2020
Historique:
received: 25 06 2020
accepted: 27 11 2020
entrez: 17 12 2020
pubmed: 18 12 2020
medline: 29 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The distribution of neurons in the cortex (cytoarchitecture) differs between cortical areas and constitutes the basis for structural maps of the human brain. Deep learning approaches provide a promising alternative to overcome throughput limitations of currently used cytoarchitectonic mapping methods, but typically lack insight as to what extent they follow cytoarchitectonic principles. We therefore investigated in how far the internal structure of deep convolutional neural networks trained for cytoarchitectonic brain mapping reflect traditional cytoarchitectonic features, and compared them to features of the current grey level index (GLI) profile approach. The networks consisted of a 10-block deep convolutional architecture trained to segment the primary and secondary visual cortex. Filter activations of the networks served to analyse resemblances to traditional cytoarchitectonic features and comparisons to the GLI profile approach. Our analysis revealed resemblances to cellular, laminar- as well as cortical area related cytoarchitectonic features. The networks learned filter activations that reflect the distinct cytoarchitecture of the segmented cortical areas with special regard to their laminar organization and compared well to statistical criteria of the GLI profile approach. These results confirm an incorporation of relevant cytoarchitectonic features in the deep convolutional neural networks and mark them as a valid support for high-throughput cytoarchitectonic mapping workflows.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33328511
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78638-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-78638-y
pmc: PMC7744572
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

22039

Références

J Comp Neurol. 1962 Feb;118:1-16
pubmed: 14477697
Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005 Dec;210(5-6):373-86
pubmed: 16249867
Med Image Anal. 2016 Oct;33:170-175
pubmed: 27423409
Neuroimage. 2002 Aug;16(4):1103-19
pubmed: 12202097
Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):988-992
pubmed: 32732281
PLoS Biol. 2020 Apr 3;18(4):e3000678
pubmed: 32243449
Trends Neurosci. 2018 Nov;41(11):775-788
pubmed: 29980393
Elife. 2017 Dec 05;6:
pubmed: 29205151
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Nov;39(11):1568-81
pubmed: 19582566
Brain Struct Funct. 2013 Jan;218(1):157-72
pubmed: 22354469
J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:574-91
pubmed: 14403679
Nature. 1978 Aug 3;274(5670):423-8
pubmed: 97565
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;9:234-63
pubmed: 26742143
Neuroimage. 2003 May;19(1):42-63
pubmed: 12781726
J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229-89
pubmed: 14283058
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Aug 8;298(2):188-214
pubmed: 2212102
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):2551-2562
pubmed: 29901791
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Jan;36(1):288-300
pubmed: 27623573
J Chem Neuroanat. 2000 Oct;20(1):31-47
pubmed: 11074342
J Neurophysiol. 1967 Nov;30(6):1561-73
pubmed: 6066454
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
Science. 1992 Jan 24;255(5043):419-23
pubmed: 1734518
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3911-31
pubmed: 25452571
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):1045-59
pubmed: 17266106
Brain Res. 1970 Apr 1;19(1):63-75
pubmed: 4985444
Neuron. 2015 Dec 16;88(6):1086-1107
pubmed: 26687219
Biol Cybern. 1975 Nov 5;20(3-4):121-36
pubmed: 1203338
J Comp Neurol. 1972 Dec;146(4):421-50
pubmed: 4117368
Vision Res. 1984;24(5):429-48
pubmed: 6740964
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Science. 2013 Jun 21;340(6139):1472-5
pubmed: 23788795
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1061-5; discussion 1066-8
pubmed: 17870622
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Feb 09;16:34-42
pubmed: 30275936
Neuroimage. 1999 Jan;9(1):165-77
pubmed: 9918738
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):139-45
pubmed: 20046193
J Physiol. 2009 Jun 15;587(Pt 12):2791-805
pubmed: 19525564
Elife. 2017 Dec 05;6:
pubmed: 29205152
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Aug;22(8):986-1004
pubmed: 12906253
Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):366-83
pubmed: 17964252
Neuroimage. 2000 Jan;11(1):66-84
pubmed: 10686118
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):15-26
pubmed: 14741638

Auteurs

Kai Kiwitz (K)

Cécile and Oskar Vogt Institute of Brain Research, Univ. Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. kai.kiwitz@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Max Planck School of Cognition, Stephanstrasse 1a, Leipzig, Germany. kai.kiwitz@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Christian Schiffer (C)

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Hannah Spitzer (H)

Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany.

Timo Dickscheid (T)

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Katrin Amunts (K)

Cécile and Oskar Vogt Institute of Brain Research, Univ. Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Max Planck School of Cognition, Stephanstrasse 1a, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH