Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?

dog-human relationship dogs domestication heart rate heart rate variability wolves

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 31 05 2020
accepted: 26 10 2020
entrez: 17 12 2020
pubmed: 18 12 2020
medline: 18 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Due to domestication, dogs differ from wolves in the way they respond to their environment, including to humans. Selection for tameness and the associated changes to the autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation have been proposed as the primary mechanisms of domestication. To test this idea, we compared two low-arousal states in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs: resting, a state close to being asleep, and inactive wakefulness, which together take up an important part in the time budgets of wolves and dogs. We measured arousal via cardiac output in three conditions: alone, with a familiar human partner, or with pack members (i.e., conspecifics). Specifically, we compared heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) of six wolves and seven dogs. As patterns of resting can vary adaptively, even between closely related species, we predicted that dogs would be generally more aroused than wolves, because living with humans may come with less predictable contexts than living with conspecifics; hence, dogs would need to be responsive at all times. Furthermore, we predicted that due to the effects of domestication, emotional social support by familiar people would reduce arousal more in dogs than in equally human-socialized wolves, leading to more relaxed dogs than wolves when away from the pack. Overall, we found a clear effect of the interactions between species (i.e., wolf versus dog), arousal state (i.e., resting or awake inactive) and test conditions, on both HR and HRV. Wolves and dogs were more aroused when alone (i.e., higher HR and lower HRV) than when in the presence of conspecifics or a familiar human partner. Dogs were more relaxed than wolves when at rest and close to a familiar human but this difference disappeared when awake. In conclusion, instead of the expected distinct overall differences between wolves and dogs in ANS regulation, we rather found subtle context-specific responses, suggesting that such details are important in understanding the domestication process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33329204
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199
pmc: PMC7732590
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

568199

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jean-Joseph, Kortekaas, Range and Kotrschal.

Références

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1984 Fall;8(3):269-300
pubmed: 6504414
Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 22;92(3):293-316
pubmed: 17320122
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56935
pubmed: 23437276
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0162389
pubmed: 27611784
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1967 Jul 1;151(1):60-3
pubmed: 6068215
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jan;10(1):2-13
pubmed: 8458993
Physiol Behav. 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96
pubmed: 12044602
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
pubmed: 30164232
Science. 2016 Jun 3;352(6290):1228-31
pubmed: 27257259
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3437
pubmed: 30837560
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e65296
pubmed: 23734243
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16888
pubmed: 21373192
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 15;5:1582
pubmed: 25642203
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug;31(8):590-599
pubmed: 27262386
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:149-56
pubmed: 24726397
Physiol Behav. 2003 Aug;79(3):503-13
pubmed: 12954445
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Behav Processes. 2016 Jul;128:108-12
pubmed: 27129806
Sleep Med Rev. 2008 Jun;12(3):229-44
pubmed: 18403222
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 26;9(1):17591
pubmed: 31772201
Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1264-71
pubmed: 16251951
Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 18;8:16082
pubmed: 28719574
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Jan;65(1):47-55
pubmed: 21297852
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58475
pubmed: 23469283
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 03;4:868
pubmed: 24363648
Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:15-21
pubmed: 25447510
J Hered. 1979 Sep-Oct;70(5):301-8
pubmed: 528781
Nature. 2013 Mar 21;495(7441):360-4
pubmed: 23354050
Circulation. 1955 Oct;12(4):567-76
pubmed: 13261309
Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Apr;76 Suppl 2:S86-90
pubmed: 19376991
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):373-87
pubmed: 18183437
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Oct 25;284(1865):
pubmed: 29070727
Science. 2007 Apr 6;316(5821):112-5
pubmed: 17412960
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421
pubmed: 20371374
Genetika. 2004 Jun;40(6):794-807
pubmed: 15341270
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):287-94
pubmed: 23643552
J Small Anim Pract. 2013 Jun;54(6):318-24
pubmed: 23662951
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 02;8(7):
pubmed: 30004461
Top Companion Anim Med. 2017 Jun;32(2):66-71
pubmed: 28992907
Genetics. 2014 Jul;197(3):795-808
pubmed: 25024034
J Vet Cardiol. 2010 Aug;12(2):107-10
pubmed: 20634163
Physiol Behav. 2013 Apr 10;114-115:1-5
pubmed: 23499770
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103877
pubmed: 31153928
Trends Neurosci. 2008 Apr;31(4):208-13
pubmed: 18328577
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Oct 17;136(1):193-9
pubmed: 12385805
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10092
pubmed: 31300672
Attach Hum Dev. 2019 Aug;21(4):389-417
pubmed: 30246604
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1356-1364
pubmed: 25540125
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1997 Oct;44(8):449-60
pubmed: 9421947
Int J Psychophysiol. 2001 Oct;42(2):123-46
pubmed: 11587772
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Oct;93(2):965-9
pubmed: 22240295
Psychophysiology. 1995 Jul;32(4):301-18
pubmed: 7652107
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1989 Jan;19(1):1-12
pubmed: 2646811
Physiol Behav. 2015 Jan;138:247-53
pubmed: 25446208
Am Nat. 2006 Oct;168(4):441-53
pubmed: 17004217
Am J Physiol. 1966 Feb;210(2):321-8
pubmed: 5901470
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;117(9):1885-901
pubmed: 16581292
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3796
pubmed: 30846770
Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:270-281
pubmed: 28501556
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jun 28;4(6):160956
pubmed: 28680658
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Dec;44(12):1031-51
pubmed: 17111118
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7109
pubmed: 29740040
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):103-8
pubmed: 8851558
J Small Anim Pract. 2010 Aug;51(8):412-8
pubmed: 20553373
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;31(3):593-601
pubmed: 9502641
Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 19;3(7):e1700398
pubmed: 28776031
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86559
pubmed: 24489744

Auteurs

Hillary Jean-Joseph (H)

Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolf Science Center, Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Kim Kortekaas (K)

Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolf Science Center, Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Friederike Range (F)

Wolf Science Center, Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Kurt Kotrschal (K)

Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolf Science Center, Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH