Shining a Light on Race: Contrast and Assimilation Effects in the Perception of Skin Tone and Racial Typicality.
assimilation
contrast
face perception
facial morphology
lightness and brightness illusions
race
skin tone
skin tone bias
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
10
09
2020
accepted:
09
11
2020
entrez:
17
12
2020
pubmed:
18
12
2020
medline:
18
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Researchers have long debated the extent to which an individual's skin tone influences their perceived race. Brooks and Gwinn (2010) demonstrated that the race of surrounding faces can affect the perceived skin tone of a central target face without changing perceived racial typicality, suggesting that skin lightness makes a small contribution to judgments of race compared to morphological cues (the configuration and shape of the facial features). However, the lack of a consistent light source may have undermined the reliability of skin tone cues, encouraging observers to rely disproportionately on morphological cues instead. The current study addresses this concern by using 3D models of male faces with typically Black African or White European appearances that are illuminated by the same light source. Observers perceived target faces surrounded by White faces to have darker skin than those surrounded by Black faces, particularly for faces of intermediate lightness. However, when asked to judge racial typicality, a small assimilation effect was evident, with target faces perceived as more stereotypically White when surrounded by White than when surrounded by Black faces at intermediate levels of typicality. This evidence of assimilation effects for perceived racial typicality despite concurrent contrast effects on perceived skin lightness supports the previous conclusion that perceived skin lightness has little influence on judgments of racial typicality for racially ambiguous faces, even when lighting is consistent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33329276
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604617
pmc: PMC7728794
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
604617Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Brooks, Sturman and Gwinn.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Psychol. 1969 Mar;82(1):56-72
pubmed: 5810462
Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):795-834
pubmed: 10560329
Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(1):B1-11
pubmed: 9775518
Dev Sci. 2015 May;18(3):469-83
pubmed: 25154647
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1654-67
pubmed: 22825930
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):383-6
pubmed: 16683924
J Vis. 2007 Sep 14;7(12):2.1-15
pubmed: 17997644
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):157-62
pubmed: 11340926
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):628-34
pubmed: 7790837
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;149(1):66-81
pubmed: 19245048
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):718-34
pubmed: 19485687
Perception. 2011;40(5):621-4
pubmed: 21882724
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:56-66
pubmed: 25462031
Perception. 2010;39(8):1142-5
pubmed: 20942364
Vision Res. 2019 Apr;157:159-168
pubmed: 29555300
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1886-902
pubmed: 21688072
Vision Res. 2001 Oct;41(23):2979-94
pubmed: 11704237
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):5-25
pubmed: 12088132
Am J Psychol. 1959 Dec;72:530-8
pubmed: 14400942
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):264-9
pubmed: 12120788
Perception. 2000;29(2):159-70
pubmed: 10820599
Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Sep 22;261(1362):367-73
pubmed: 8587879
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):224-8
pubmed: 21287118
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 24;9:368
pubmed: 26157381
Perception. 2015;44(4):339-58
pubmed: 26492718
Am J Psychol. 1970 Jun;83(2):189-207
pubmed: 5450896
J Hum Evol. 2000 Jul;39(1):57-106
pubmed: 10896812