Cementless hip revision cup for the primary fixation of osteoporotic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients.


Journal

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 31 07 2019
revised: 11 08 2020
accepted: 20 08 2020
pubmed: 18 12 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 17 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Elderly patients suffering from hip fractures are usually not able to fulfil postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. Therefore, the operative fixation construct has to be as stable as possible. Aim of the present study was to determine (1) whether a therapeutic advantage could be achieved when using hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular fractures in geriatric patients; (2) whether an acetabular revision cup would be suitable for achieving fast postoperative mobilization and full weight-bearing; and (3) when a treatment with an uncemented hip revision cup for the primary fixation of osteoporotic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients is indicated. The functional outcome of THA using a reconstruction cup for an acetabular fracture was evaluated in ten patients using standardized scoring instruments. In addition, an analysis of the preexisting literature referring to total hip replacement in geriatric acetabular fractures was conducted and an algorithm for standardizing the treatment approach for geriatric patients with acetabular fractures was developed. The mean EQ-5D-3L quality of life score 0.7. The mean VAS Score was 58.2. The average Barthel Index was 80.0 points [range: 0-100]. The mean HHS was 72.0 points, while the MHH Score yielded an average of 63.4 points. The average AP Score was 7.5. The literature analysis showed that total hip arthroplasty could be a feasible option for geriatric acetabular fractures. Primary hip arthroplasty using uncemented revision cup fixed with angular stable screws showed good results and is a feasible treatment option of acetabular fractures in geriatric patients. The approach is especially beneficial in patients with poor bone stock and allows postoperative full weight-bearing. The presented treatment algorithm could be a useful tool for identifying the most appropriate treatment option. IIb.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Elderly patients suffering from hip fractures are usually not able to fulfil postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. Therefore, the operative fixation construct has to be as stable as possible. Aim of the present study was to determine (1) whether a therapeutic advantage could be achieved when using hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular fractures in geriatric patients; (2) whether an acetabular revision cup would be suitable for achieving fast postoperative mobilization and full weight-bearing; and (3) when a treatment with an uncemented hip revision cup for the primary fixation of osteoporotic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients is indicated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The functional outcome of THA using a reconstruction cup for an acetabular fracture was evaluated in ten patients using standardized scoring instruments. In addition, an analysis of the preexisting literature referring to total hip replacement in geriatric acetabular fractures was conducted and an algorithm for standardizing the treatment approach for geriatric patients with acetabular fractures was developed.
RESULTS
The mean EQ-5D-3L quality of life score 0.7. The mean VAS Score was 58.2. The average Barthel Index was 80.0 points [range: 0-100]. The mean HHS was 72.0 points, while the MHH Score yielded an average of 63.4 points. The average AP Score was 7.5. The literature analysis showed that total hip arthroplasty could be a feasible option for geriatric acetabular fractures.
CONCLUSION
Primary hip arthroplasty using uncemented revision cup fixed with angular stable screws showed good results and is a feasible treatment option of acetabular fractures in geriatric patients. The approach is especially beneficial in patients with poor bone stock and allows postoperative full weight-bearing. The presented treatment algorithm could be a useful tool for identifying the most appropriate treatment option.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IIb.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33333281
pii: S1877-0568(20)30336-4
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102745
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102745

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Christopher A Becker (CA)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: christopher.becker@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Christoph Linhart (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Jan Bruder (J)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Christian Zeckey (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Axel Greiner (A)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul (A)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Simon Weidert (S)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Eduardo M Suero (EM)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Wolfgang Böcker (W)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Christian Kammerlander (C)

Department of General Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH