Regional trends in birth weight in low- and middle-income countries 2013-2018.
Birth weight
Global network
Low birth weight
Neonatal mortality
Newborns
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Dec 2020
17 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
26
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
18
12
2020
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Birth weight (BW) is a strong predictor of neonatal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare BWs between global regions (south Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Central America) prospectively and to determine if trends exist in BW over time using the population-based maternal and newborn registry (MNHR) of the Global Network for Women'sand Children's Health Research (Global Network). The MNHR is a prospective observational population-based registryof six research sites participating in the Global Network (2013-2018), within five low- and middle-income countries (Kenya, Zambia, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala) in threeglobal regions (sub-Saharan Af rica, south Asia, Central America). The birth weights were obtained for all infants born during the study period. This was done either by abstracting from the infants' health facility records or from direct measurement by the registry staff for infants born at home. After controlling for demographic characteristics, mixed-effect regression models were utilized to examine regional differences in birth weights over time. The overall BW meanswere higher for the African sites (Zambia and Kenya), 3186 g (SD 463 g) in 2013 and 3149 g (SD 449 g) in 2018, ascompared to Asian sites (Belagavi and Nagpur, India and Pakistan), 2717 g (SD450 g) in 2013 and 2713 g (SD 452 g) in 2018. The Central American site (Guatemala) had a mean BW intermediate between the African and south Asian sites, 2928 g (SD 452) in 2013, and 2874 g (SD 448) in 2018. The low birth weight (LBW) incidence was highest in the south Asian sites (India and Pakistan) and lowest in the African sites (Kenya and Zambia). The size of regional differences varied somewhat over time with slight decreases in the gap in birth weights between the African and Asian sites and slight increases in the gap between the African and Central American sites. Overall, BWmeans by global region did not change significantly over the 5-year study period. From 2013 to 2018, infants enrolled at the African sites demonstrated the highest BW means overall across the entire study period, particularly as compared to Asian sites. The incidence of LBW was highest in the Asian sites (India and Pakistan) compared to the African and Central American sites. Trial registration The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT01073475.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Birth weight (BW) is a strong predictor of neonatal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare BWs between global regions (south Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Central America) prospectively and to determine if trends exist in BW over time using the population-based maternal and newborn registry (MNHR) of the Global Network for Women'sand Children's Health Research (Global Network).
METHODS
METHODS
The MNHR is a prospective observational population-based registryof six research sites participating in the Global Network (2013-2018), within five low- and middle-income countries (Kenya, Zambia, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala) in threeglobal regions (sub-Saharan Af rica, south Asia, Central America). The birth weights were obtained for all infants born during the study period. This was done either by abstracting from the infants' health facility records or from direct measurement by the registry staff for infants born at home. After controlling for demographic characteristics, mixed-effect regression models were utilized to examine regional differences in birth weights over time.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall BW meanswere higher for the African sites (Zambia and Kenya), 3186 g (SD 463 g) in 2013 and 3149 g (SD 449 g) in 2018, ascompared to Asian sites (Belagavi and Nagpur, India and Pakistan), 2717 g (SD450 g) in 2013 and 2713 g (SD 452 g) in 2018. The Central American site (Guatemala) had a mean BW intermediate between the African and south Asian sites, 2928 g (SD 452) in 2013, and 2874 g (SD 448) in 2018. The low birth weight (LBW) incidence was highest in the south Asian sites (India and Pakistan) and lowest in the African sites (Kenya and Zambia). The size of regional differences varied somewhat over time with slight decreases in the gap in birth weights between the African and Asian sites and slight increases in the gap between the African and Central American sites.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, BWmeans by global region did not change significantly over the 5-year study period. From 2013 to 2018, infants enrolled at the African sites demonstrated the highest BW means overall across the entire study period, particularly as compared to Asian sites. The incidence of LBW was highest in the Asian sites (India and Pakistan) compared to the African and Central American sites. Trial registration The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT01073475.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33334365
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01026-2
pii: 10.1186/s12978-020-01026-2
pmc: PMC7745347
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01073475']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
176Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076461
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD078439
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076465
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD078438
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076457
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076474
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jan 1;183(1):24-5
pubmed: 26667252
Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):748-54
pubmed: 26794171
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 May;15(2):e177-83
pubmed: 26052449
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017 Jan;50(1):18-28
pubmed: 28173687
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Nov;34(11):1026-1037
pubmed: 23231840
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77(2):232-44
pubmed: 6346592
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr 1;165(7):734-41
pubmed: 17311798
Bull World Health Organ. 1983;61(6):1005-16
pubmed: 6370484
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Jan-Feb;64(1-2 Suppl):28-35
pubmed: 11425175
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Mar 1;39(1):122-131
pubmed: 26888979
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1424-1433
pubmed: 31230168
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 May 03;15:73
pubmed: 27141948
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S12
pubmed: 26063483
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 21;7(1):18035
pubmed: 29269836
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 05;3(12):e003650
pubmed: 24319272
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Aug 8;4:15
pubmed: 30094052
BMC Med. 2018 Aug 31;16(1):153
pubmed: 30165842
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 May;103(3):F264-F270
pubmed: 28780501
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jan 1;183(1):15-23
pubmed: 26667251
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1340-55
pubmed: 23920141
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Mar 19;12:15
pubmed: 22429731
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 24;14(1):e1002220
pubmed: 28118360
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S1
pubmed: 26063166