Assessing Durability of Vaccine Effect Following Blinded Crossover in COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Trials.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Dec 2020
14 Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
12
2020
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
19
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several candidate vaccines to prevent COVID-19 disease have entered large-scale phase 3 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials and some have demonstrated substantial short-term efficacy. Efficacious vaccines should, at some point, be offered to placebo participants, which will occur before long-term efficacy and safety are known. Following vaccination of the placebo group, we show that placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy can be derived by assuming the benefit of vaccination over time has the same profile for the original vaccine recipients and the placebo crossovers. This reconstruction allows estimation of both vaccine durability and potential vaccine-associated enhanced disease. Post-crossover estimates of vaccine efficacy can provide insights about durability, identify waning efficacy, and identify late enhancement of disease, but are less reliable estimates than those obtained by a standard trial where the placebo cohort is maintained. As vaccine efficacy estimates for post-crossover periods depend on prior vaccine efficacy estimates, longer pre-crossover periods with higher case counts provide better estimates of late vaccine efficacy. Further, open-label crossover may lead to riskier behavior in the immediate crossover period for the unblinded vaccine arm, confounding vaccine efficacy estimates for all post-crossover periods. We advocate blinded crossover and continued follow-up of trial participants to best assess vaccine durability and potential delayed enhancement of disease. This approach allows placebo recipients timely access to the vaccine when it would no longer be proper to maintain participants on placebo, yet still allows important insights about immunological and clinical effectiveness over time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Several candidate vaccines to prevent COVID-19 disease have entered large-scale phase 3 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials and some have demonstrated substantial short-term efficacy. Efficacious vaccines should, at some point, be offered to placebo participants, which will occur before long-term efficacy and safety are known.
METHODS
METHODS
Following vaccination of the placebo group, we show that placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy can be derived by assuming the benefit of vaccination over time has the same profile for the original vaccine recipients and the placebo crossovers. This reconstruction allows estimation of both vaccine durability and potential vaccine-associated enhanced disease.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Post-crossover estimates of vaccine efficacy can provide insights about durability, identify waning efficacy, and identify late enhancement of disease, but are less reliable estimates than those obtained by a standard trial where the placebo cohort is maintained. As vaccine efficacy estimates for post-crossover periods depend on prior vaccine efficacy estimates, longer pre-crossover periods with higher case counts provide better estimates of late vaccine efficacy. Further, open-label crossover may lead to riskier behavior in the immediate crossover period for the unblinded vaccine arm, confounding vaccine efficacy estimates for all post-crossover periods.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We advocate blinded crossover and continued follow-up of trial participants to best assess vaccine durability and potential delayed enhancement of disease. This approach allows placebo recipients timely access to the vaccine when it would no longer be proper to maintain participants on placebo, yet still allows important insights about immunological and clinical effectiveness over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33336213
doi: 10.1101/2020.12.14.20248137
pmc: PMC7745130
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R37 AI029168
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068614
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R37 AI054165
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068635
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068617
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):551
pubmed: 32381692
Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):958-65
pubmed: 19930189
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 May 15;147(10):948-59
pubmed: 9596473
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;:
pubmed: 33301246
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(11):1615-7
pubmed: 22437237
Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Oct;105(2):435-46
pubmed: 2170159
PLoS Biol. 2020 Nov 9;18(11):e3001000
pubmed: 33166303
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):327-340
pubmed: 29897841
J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;196(9):1304-12
pubmed: 17922394
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33050983
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 17;11(1):4704
pubmed: 32943637
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 22;:
pubmed: 33090877
Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30
pubmed: 3719049
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 2;68(10):1631-1633
pubmed: 30204853
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Nov 4;12(568):
pubmed: 33077678
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 2;:
pubmed: 33264543
Science. 2020 Dec 11;370(6522):1277-1279
pubmed: 33273060
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Oct;5(10):1185-1191
pubmed: 32908214
Science. 2020 May 29;368(6494):948-950
pubmed: 32393526
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6
pubmed: 15033648
Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):741-743
pubmed: 32861315
Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1161-9
pubmed: 17156291
Lancet. 2020 Dec 8;:
pubmed: 33306989
Stat Med. 2012 Nov 10;31(25):2973-84
pubmed: 22711298
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1085-1087
pubmed: 32706954
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1595-1606
pubmed: 33065034