Cluster headache is one of the most intensely painful human conditions: Results from the International Cluster Headache Questionnaire.
cluster headache
cranial autonomic features
pain intensity
survey
trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia
trigeminal autonomic reflex
Journal
Headache
ISSN: 1526-4610
Titre abrégé: Headache
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985091R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
04
05
2020
revised:
23
08
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
18
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the pain intensity of cluster headache through a large survey by comparing it to other painful disorders. Furthermore, to investigate the relationship between maximal pain, autonomic, and other clinical symptoms, as well as demographic attributes of cluster headache. The pain of cluster headache is anecdotally considered to be one of the worst pains in existence. The link between pain and autonomic features of cluster headache is understood mechanistically through the trigeminovascular reflex, though it is not clear if this is a graded response. Links between pain and other features of cluster headache are less well understood. This Internet-based cross-sectional survey included questions on cluster headache diagnostic criteria, which were used as part of the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study. Respondents were asked to rate a cluster headache attack on the 0-10 numerical rating scale. Additionally, they were asked if they had experienced a list of other painful conditions such as labor pain or nephrolithiasis; if so they were asked to rate that pain as well. The survey also included demographics, mood scores, and treatment responses. A total of 1604 cluster headache respondents were included in the analysis. Respondents rated cluster headache as significantly (p < 0.001) more intense than every other pain condition examined. Cluster headache attacks were rated as 9.7 ± 0.6 (mean ± standard deviation) on the numerical rating scale, followed by labor pain (7.2 ± 2.0), pancreatitis (7.0 ± 1.5), and nephrolithiasis (6.9 ± 1.9). The majority of cluster headache respondents rated a cluster headache attack at maximal or 10.0 pain (72.1%, 1157/1604). Respondents with maximal pain were statistically significantly more likely to have cranial autonomic features compared to respondents with less pain: conjunctival injection or lacrimation 91% (1057/1157) versus 85% (381/447), eyelid edema 77% (887/1157) versus 66% (293/447), forehead/facial sweating 60% (693/1157) versus 49% (217/447), fullness in the ear 47% (541/1157) versus 35% (155/447), and miosis/ptosis 85% (1124/1157) versus 75% (426/447) (all p values <0.001). Respondents with maximal pain also had other statistically significant findings: more frequent attacks (4.0 ± 2.0 attacks per day vs. 3.5 ± 2.0 attacks per day), higher Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire scores (24.5 ± 16.9 vs. 21.1 ± 15.2), decreased overall effectiveness from calcium channel blockers (on a 5-point Likert scale), and more likely female: 34% (389/1157) versus 24% (108/447) (all p values <0.001). Pain intensity was not associated with restlessness, headache duration, age of onset, episodic/chronic status, or the effectiveness of any acute or preventive medication other than calcium channel blockers. Cluster headache is an intensely painful disorder, even in the context of other disorders considered intensely painful. Maximal pain intensity is associated with more cranial autonomic features, suggesting a graded response between pain and autonomic features. Maximal pain intensity is also associated with headache frequency but not duration, suggesting a relationship between pain intensity and mechanisms controlling headache onset, but not between pain intensity and mechanisms controlling headache offset.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To determine the pain intensity of cluster headache through a large survey by comparing it to other painful disorders. Furthermore, to investigate the relationship between maximal pain, autonomic, and other clinical symptoms, as well as demographic attributes of cluster headache.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The pain of cluster headache is anecdotally considered to be one of the worst pains in existence. The link between pain and autonomic features of cluster headache is understood mechanistically through the trigeminovascular reflex, though it is not clear if this is a graded response. Links between pain and other features of cluster headache are less well understood.
METHODS
METHODS
This Internet-based cross-sectional survey included questions on cluster headache diagnostic criteria, which were used as part of the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study. Respondents were asked to rate a cluster headache attack on the 0-10 numerical rating scale. Additionally, they were asked if they had experienced a list of other painful conditions such as labor pain or nephrolithiasis; if so they were asked to rate that pain as well. The survey also included demographics, mood scores, and treatment responses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1604 cluster headache respondents were included in the analysis. Respondents rated cluster headache as significantly (p < 0.001) more intense than every other pain condition examined. Cluster headache attacks were rated as 9.7 ± 0.6 (mean ± standard deviation) on the numerical rating scale, followed by labor pain (7.2 ± 2.0), pancreatitis (7.0 ± 1.5), and nephrolithiasis (6.9 ± 1.9). The majority of cluster headache respondents rated a cluster headache attack at maximal or 10.0 pain (72.1%, 1157/1604). Respondents with maximal pain were statistically significantly more likely to have cranial autonomic features compared to respondents with less pain: conjunctival injection or lacrimation 91% (1057/1157) versus 85% (381/447), eyelid edema 77% (887/1157) versus 66% (293/447), forehead/facial sweating 60% (693/1157) versus 49% (217/447), fullness in the ear 47% (541/1157) versus 35% (155/447), and miosis/ptosis 85% (1124/1157) versus 75% (426/447) (all p values <0.001). Respondents with maximal pain also had other statistically significant findings: more frequent attacks (4.0 ± 2.0 attacks per day vs. 3.5 ± 2.0 attacks per day), higher Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire scores (24.5 ± 16.9 vs. 21.1 ± 15.2), decreased overall effectiveness from calcium channel blockers (on a 5-point Likert scale), and more likely female: 34% (389/1157) versus 24% (108/447) (all p values <0.001). Pain intensity was not associated with restlessness, headache duration, age of onset, episodic/chronic status, or the effectiveness of any acute or preventive medication other than calcium channel blockers.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Cluster headache is an intensely painful disorder, even in the context of other disorders considered intensely painful. Maximal pain intensity is associated with more cranial autonomic features, suggesting a graded response between pain and autonomic features. Maximal pain intensity is also associated with headache frequency but not duration, suggesting a relationship between pain intensity and mechanisms controlling headache onset, but not between pain intensity and mechanisms controlling headache offset.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33337540
doi: 10.1111/head.14021
pmc: PMC7898696
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
117-124Subventions
Organisme : Autonomic Technologies, Inc.
Organisme : Clusterbusters
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.
Références
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Mar 01;4:18006
pubmed: 29493566
J Hand Ther. 2018 Apr - Jun;31(2):179-183
pubmed: 29433765
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2019 Jan;225(1):e13161
pubmed: 29969187
Cephalalgia. 2006 Mar;26(3):241-5
pubmed: 16472329
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):577-83
pubmed: 19076128
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:93-102
pubmed: 25444078
J Palliat Med. 2007 Dec;10(6):1338-46
pubmed: 18095813
Cephalalgia. 2019 Jun;39(7):900-907
pubmed: 30857402
Headache. 2012 Jan;52(1):99-113
pubmed: 22077141
Pain. 1995 May;61(2):277-284
pubmed: 7659438
Lancet Neurol. 2002 Aug;1(4):251-7
pubmed: 12849458
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211
pubmed: 29368949
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
pubmed: 13688369
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2266-71
pubmed: 25298293
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):575-600
pubmed: 20438238
Cephalalgia. 2020 Jan;40(1):79-87
pubmed: 31382763
Cephalalgia. 2019 Sep;39(10):1249-1256
pubmed: 31018651
Headache. 2019 Feb;59(2):235-249
pubmed: 30632614
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jan;17(1):75-83
pubmed: 29174963
Pain. 2007 Nov;132 Suppl 1:S26-S45
pubmed: 17964077
Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 22;10:1220
pubmed: 31824403
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Jun 15;317(1-2):17-28
pubmed: 22482825
Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1113-1117
pubmed: 28267062
Cephalalgia. 2016 Apr;36(4):346-50
pubmed: 26111946
Lancet. 2005 Sep 3-9;366(9488):843-55
pubmed: 16139660
Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):154-159
pubmed: 23182623
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):283-288
pubmed: 30328678
Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 3;338:63-80
pubmed: 27180284
Curr Opin Neurol. 2019 Jun;32(3):438-442
pubmed: 30865010
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Mar;32(3):502-506
pubmed: 28145655
Brain. 1997 Jan;120 ( Pt 1):193-209
pubmed: 9055807