Erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine: Erenumab in Real Life in Italy (EARLY), the first Italian multicenter, prospective real-life study.


Journal

Headache
ISSN: 1526-4610
Titre abrégé: Headache
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985091R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
revised: 14 08 2020
accepted: 15 08 2020
pubmed: 19 12 2020
medline: 28 12 2021
entrez: 18 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in a real-life migraine population, while trying to identify responsiveness predictors. Erenumab is a fully human Ig-2 monoclonal antibody blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, indicated for migraine prophylaxis. Phase II and III trials demonstrated that erenumab is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (CM), showing an early onset of action. This is a multicenter, prospective, cohort, and real-life study. We considered for enrolment all consecutive patients aged 18-65 affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or CM, with or without medication overuse, visited at nine Italian Headache Centers from December 20, 2018 to September 30, 2019. Each patient was treated with erenumab 70 mg, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Treatment duration was planned to last from 6 to 12 months, depending on the patient's response. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at weeks 9-12 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in monthly analgesics intake, ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates and any variation in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Headache Impact Test scores (HIT). In total, 372 migraine patients were treated with at least one dose of erenumab 70 mg. At weeks 9-12, erenumab decreased MMDs by 4.5 ± 4.1 days (mean ± SD) in patients with HFEM and by 9.3 ± 9.1 (mean ± SD) days in those with CM compared to baseline. At weeks 9-12 VAS score was reduced by 1.9 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD), HIT score by 10.7 ± 8.8 (mean ± SD), and median monthly analgesics intake passed from 12.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.0-14.0) to 5.0 (IQR 3.0-7.0) in HFEM. In CM patients, VAS was reduced by 1.7 ± 2.0 (mean ± SD), HIT by 9.7 ± 10.4 (mean ± SD), and median monthly analgesics intake passed from 20.0 (IQR 15.0-30.0) to 8.0 (IQR 5.0-15.0). At week 12, ≥50% responders were 60/101 (59.4%) for HFEM and 146/263 (55.5%) for CM, ≥75% responders were 17/101 (16.8%) and 59/263 (22.4%) and 100% responders 1/101 (1.0%) and 3/263 (1.1%), respectively. Erenumab responsiveness in HFEM was positively associated with unilateral pain localization (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.24-7.40; p = 0.015), whereas in CM responsiveness was positively associated with and baseline migraine frequency (OR: 1.06, 95% CI:1.02-1.11; p = 0.031), dopaminergic symptoms (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.14-3.52; p = 0.015), and negatively associated with psychiatric comorbidities (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.93; p = 0.003). Erenumab 70 mg is effective, safe, and well tolerated in real life. Easily obtainable clinical features might be of help in predicting patient's responsiveness.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in a real-life migraine population, while trying to identify responsiveness predictors.
BACKGROUND
Erenumab is a fully human Ig-2 monoclonal antibody blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, indicated for migraine prophylaxis. Phase II and III trials demonstrated that erenumab is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (CM), showing an early onset of action.
METHODS
This is a multicenter, prospective, cohort, and real-life study. We considered for enrolment all consecutive patients aged 18-65 affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or CM, with or without medication overuse, visited at nine Italian Headache Centers from December 20, 2018 to September 30, 2019. Each patient was treated with erenumab 70 mg, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Treatment duration was planned to last from 6 to 12 months, depending on the patient's response. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at weeks 9-12 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in monthly analgesics intake, ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates and any variation in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Headache Impact Test scores (HIT).
RESULTS
In total, 372 migraine patients were treated with at least one dose of erenumab 70 mg. At weeks 9-12, erenumab decreased MMDs by 4.5 ± 4.1 days (mean ± SD) in patients with HFEM and by 9.3 ± 9.1 (mean ± SD) days in those with CM compared to baseline. At weeks 9-12 VAS score was reduced by 1.9 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD), HIT score by 10.7 ± 8.8 (mean ± SD), and median monthly analgesics intake passed from 12.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.0-14.0) to 5.0 (IQR 3.0-7.0) in HFEM. In CM patients, VAS was reduced by 1.7 ± 2.0 (mean ± SD), HIT by 9.7 ± 10.4 (mean ± SD), and median monthly analgesics intake passed from 20.0 (IQR 15.0-30.0) to 8.0 (IQR 5.0-15.0). At week 12, ≥50% responders were 60/101 (59.4%) for HFEM and 146/263 (55.5%) for CM, ≥75% responders were 17/101 (16.8%) and 59/263 (22.4%) and 100% responders 1/101 (1.0%) and 3/263 (1.1%), respectively. Erenumab responsiveness in HFEM was positively associated with unilateral pain localization (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.24-7.40; p = 0.015), whereas in CM responsiveness was positively associated with and baseline migraine frequency (OR: 1.06, 95% CI:1.02-1.11; p = 0.031), dopaminergic symptoms (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.14-3.52; p = 0.015), and negatively associated with psychiatric comorbidities (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.93; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
Erenumab 70 mg is effective, safe, and well tolerated in real life. Easily obtainable clinical features might be of help in predicting patient's responsiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33337544
doi: 10.1111/head.14032
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists 0
erenumab I5I8VB78VT

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

363-372

Subventions

Organisme : This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Institutional Funding Ricerca Corrente).

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Headache Society.

Références

Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30435-0
Cameron C, Kelly S, Hsieh SC, et al. Triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Headache. 2015;55(suppl. 4):221-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12601
Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21:973-989. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000199.
May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):455-464.
Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies-successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:338-350.
Hargreaves R, Olesen J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulators-the history and renaissance of a new migraine drug class. Headache. 2019;59(6):951-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13510
Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Ailani J, et al. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(23):2230-2241. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813049
Lipton RB, Croop R, Stock EG, et al. Rimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):142-149. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811090
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03732638. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, et al. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2018/761077Orig1s000TOC.cfm. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(6):425-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2
Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2123-2132.
Lattanzi S, Brigo F, Trinka E, et al. Erenumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. Drugs. 2019;79(4):417-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01069-1
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L. Erenumab: from scientific evidence to clinical practice-the first Italian real-life data. Neurol Sci. 2019;40(suppl. 1):177-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03839-x
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211.
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Dall'Armi V, Egeo G, Fofi L, Bonassi S. The phenotype of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms documents increased peripheral and central trigeminal sensitization. A case series of 757 patients. Cephalalgia. 2016;36(14):1334-1340.
Barbanti P, Fofi L, Aurilia C, Egeo G. Dopaminergic symptoms in migraine. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(suppl. 1):67-70.
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Guadagni F, Ferroni P. Dopaminergic symptoms in migraine: a cross-sectional study on 1148 consecutive headache center-based patients. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(11):1168-1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420929023
Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1026-1037.
Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280-2287.
Jenkins B, Cheng S, Limberg N, Hutton E. IHC. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(suppl. 1):1-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102419859835
Barbanti P, Ferroni P. Onabotulinum toxin A in the treatment of chronic migraine: patient selection and special considerations. J Pain Res. 2017;29(10):2319-2329.
Barbanti P, Egeo G. Pharmacological trials in migraine: it's time to reappraise where the headache is and what the pain is like. Headache. 2015;55(3):439-441.
Barbanti P, Egeo G, Mitsikostas DD. Trigeminal-targeted treatments in migraine: is 60% the magic number? Headache. 2019;59(9):1659-1661.
Christensen CE, Younis S, Deen M, Khan S, Ghanizada H, Ashina M. Migraine induction with calcitonin gene-related peptide in patients from erenumab trials. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0927-2
Lyengar S, Ossipov MH, Johnson KW. The role of calcitonin gene related peptide in peripheral and central pain mechanism including migraine. Pain. 2017;158(4):543-559. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000831
Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Vanacore N, Pesare M, Buzzi MG. Sumatriptan in migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms: an open study. Headache. 2003;43(4):400-403.
Barbanti P, Fofi L, Dall'Armi V, et al. Rizatriptan in migraineurs with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms: a double-blind trial. J Headache Pain. 2012;13(5):407-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-012-0440-y
Kelman L. Migraine pain location: a tertiary care study of 1283 migraineurs. Headache. 2005;45(8):1038-1047.
Cernuda-Morollón E, Larrosa D, Ramón C, Vega J, Martínez-Camblor P, Pascual J. Interictal increase of CGRP levels in peripheral blood as a biomarker for chronic migraine. Neurology. 2013;81(14):1191-1196.
Minen MT, Begasse De Dhaem O, Kroon Van Diest A, et al. Migraine and its psychiatric comorbidities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(7):741-749.
Kelman L. The triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(5):394-402.
Boudreau GP, Demers C. Treatment of chronic migraine with erenumab alone or as an add on therapy; a real world prospective observational study. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(suppl. 1):358-427.
Khalil M, Moreno-Ajona D, Greenwood F, Hoffmann J, Goadsby PJ. Effectiveness of erenumab in chronic migraine in a tertiary headache centre. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(suppl. 1):1-337.
Naegel S, Scheffler A, Wurthmann F, Holle D. Erenumab for migraine treatment-first real world data from Germany. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(suppl. 1):358-427.
Israel-Willner H, Schuh K, Koch M, Gaul C. First-hand impressions of the new monoclonal antibody erenumab from patients in Germany (PERISCOPE). Cephalalgia. 2019;39(suppl. 1):358-427.

Auteurs

Piero Barbanti (P)

Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.

Cinzia Aurilia (C)

Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.

Gabriella Egeo (G)

Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.

Luisa Fofi (L)

Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.

Sabina Cevoli (S)

IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy.

Bruno Colombo (B)

Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Massimo Filippi (M)

Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Fabio Frediani (F)

Headache Center, ASST Santi Paolo Carlo, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Bono (F)

Center for Headache and Intracranial Pressure Disorders, Neurology Unit, A.O.U. Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.

Licia Grazzi (L)

Neuroalgology Unit, Headache Center Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy.

Antonio Salerno (A)

San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Bruno Mercuri (B)

San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Antonio Carnevale (A)

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Claudia Altamura (C)

Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

Fabrizio Vernieri (F)

Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH