Is the OUTPUT Sports Unit Reliable and Valid When Estimating Back Squat and Bench Press Concentric Velocity?
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
5
8
2022
entrez:
18
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Merrigan, JJ and Martin, JR. Is the OUTPUT sports unit reliable and valid when estimating back squat and bench press concentric velocity? J Strength Cond Res 36(8): 2069-2076, 2022-This study evaluated the reliability and concurrent validity of the OUTPUT sports inertial unit to measure concentric velocity of free-weight back squat and bench press exercises. Eleven men and women performed back squat and bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) testing. One week later, subjects performed 3 repetitions of each exercise with 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, and 85% 1RM (18 total repetitions). The OUTPUT and 4 cable extension transducers (criterion) simultaneously recorded the mean and peak velocity. The OUTPUT had acceptable reliability for all loads except 85% 1RM for back squat and bench press (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72-0.96, coefficient of variation = 0.03-0.12). High systematic biases existed for the mean and peak velocity for the back squat and bench press, according to Bland-Altman plot's wide limits of agreement and ordinary least products regressions. According to Bland-Altman plots, OUTPUT tended to overestimate bench press velocity and overestimate back squat velocity at slower velocities. Least products regression analyses determined proportional bias existed for the mean and peak velocity of the back squat and peak velocity of the bench press. In conclusion, researchers and practitioners are advised not to compare velocity estimates of the OUTPUT unit with criterion devices because these methods cannot be used interchangeably. However, because of the demonstrated reliability when estimating the mean and peak velocity, strength and conditioning practitioners may find the OUTPUT unit valuable for monitoring performance of the back squat and bench press exercises. Yet, caution should be taken when evaluating loads ≥85% 1RM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33337700
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003782
pii: 00124278-202208000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2069-2076Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Askow AT, Merrigan JJ, Neddo JM, et al. Effect of strength on velocity and power during back squat exercise in resistance-trained men and women. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1–7, 2019.
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Kuzdub M, Poveda-Ortiz P, Campo-Vecino JD. Validity and reliability of the PUSH wearable device to measure movement velocity during the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 30: 1968–1974, 2016.
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Marchante D, Baz-Valle E, et al. Analysis of wearable and smartphone-based technologies for the measurement of barbell velocity in different resistance training exercises. Front Physiol 8: 649, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load–velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1897–1904, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Sato K, Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: 1170–1176, 2017.
Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: S2-S161–S2-170, 2017.
Carroll K, Sato K, Bazyler C, Triplett N, Stone M. Increases in variation of barbell kinematics are observed with increasing intensity in a graded back squat test. Sports 5: 51, 2017.
Cormie P, McBride JM, McCaulley GO. Validation of power measurement techniques in dynamic lower body resistance exercises. J Appl Biomech 23: 103–118, 2007.
Cotterman ML, Darby LA, Skelly WA. Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res 19: 169–176, 2005.
Dorrell HF, Moore JM, Smith MF, Gee TI. Validity and reliability of a linear positional transducer across commonly practised resistance training exercises. J Sports Sci 37: 67–73, 2019.
Duffey MJ, Challis JH. Fatigue effects on bar kinematics during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 21: 556–560, 2007.
Fry AC, Webber JM, Weiss LW, Fry MD, Li Y. Impaired performances with excessive high-intensity free-weight training. J Strength Cond Res 14: 54–61, 2000.
García-Ramos A, Pestaña-Melero FL, Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Haff GG. Mean velocity vs. mean propulsive velocity vs. peak velocity: Which variable determines bench press relative load with higher reliability? J Strength Cond Res 32: 1273–1279, 2018.
González-Badillo JJ, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Gorostiaga EM, Pareja-Blanco F. Maximal intended velocity training induces greater gains in bench press performance than deliberately slower half-velocity training. Eur J Sport Sci 14: 772–781, 2014.
Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Calbet JAL, et al. Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. PLoS One 7: e40621, 2012.
Hatfield DL, Kraemer WJ, Spiering BA, et al. The impact of velocity of movement on performance factors in resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 20: 760–766, 2006.
Helms ER, Cronin J, Storey A, Zourdos MC. Application of the repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion scale for resistance training. Strength Cond J 38: 42–49, 2016.
Hughes LJ, Banyard HG, Dempsey AR, Scott BR. Using load-velocity relationships to predict 1RM in free-weight exercise: A comparison of the different methods. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2409–2419, 2019.
Izquierdo-Gabarren M, González de Txabarri Expósito R, García-Pallarés J. Concurrent endurance and strength training not to failure optimizes performance gains. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1191–1199, 2009.
Jiménez-Reyes P, Samozino P, Brughelli M, Morin JB. Effectiveness of an individualized training based on force-velocity profiling during jumping. Front Physiol 7: 677, 2017.
Jovanović M, Flanagan EP. Researched applications of velocity based strength training. J Aust Strength Cond 22: 58–69, 2014.
Kellis E, Arambatzi F, Papadopoulos C. Effects of load on ground reaction force and lower limb kinematics during concentric squats. J Sports Sci 23: 1045–1055, 2005.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15: 155–163, 2016.
Król H, Gołaś A. Effect of barbell weight on the structure of the flat bench press. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1321–1337, 2017.
Lake J, Augustus S, Austin K, et al. The reliability and validity of the bar-mounted PUSH Band TM 2.0 during bench press with moderate and heavy loads. J Sports Sci 37: 2685–2690, 2019.
Laza-Cagigas R, Goss-Sampson M, Larumbe-Zabala E, Termkolli L, Naclerio F. Validity and reliability of a novel optoelectronic device to measure movement velocity, force and power during the back squat exercise. J Sports Sci 37: 795–802, 2019.
Ludbrook J. Confidence in Altman–Bland plots: A critical review of the method of differences. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 37: 143–149, 2010.
Ludbrook J. Linear regression analysis for comparing two measurers or methods of measurement: But which regression? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 37: 692–699, 2010.
Ludbrook J. A primer for biomedical scientists on how to execute Model II linear regression analysis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 39: 329–335, 2012.
Merrigan JJ, Tufano JJ, Oliver JM, et al. Reducing the loss of velocity and power in women athletes via rest redistribution. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1: 1–23, 2019.
Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Liefeith A, et al. Validity and reliability of a wearable inertial sensor to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 33: 2398–2408, 2019.
Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27: 724–735, 2017.
Pérez-Castilla A, Piepoli A, Delgado-García G, Garrido-Blanca G, García-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1258–1265, 2019.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: A review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res 19: 950–958, 2005.
Randell AD, Cronin JB, Keogh JWL, Gill ND, Pedersen MC. Effect of instantaneous performance feedback during 6 weeks of velocity-based resistance training on sport-specific performance tests. J Strength Cond Res 25: 87–93, 2011.
Renart A, Machens CK. Variability in neural activity and behavior. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25: 211–220, 2014.
Samozino P, Rejc E, Di Prampero PE, Belli A, Morin J-B. Optimal force–velocity profile in ballistic movements—Altius. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44: 313–322, 2012.
Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1725–1734, 2011.
Sánchez-Medina L, Pallarés J, Pérez C, Morán-Navarro R, González-Badillo J. Estimation of relative load from bar velocity in the full back squat exercise. Sports Med Int Open 01: E80–E88, 2017.
Schmidt RA, Sherwood DE, Zelaznik HN, Leikind BJ. Speed-accuracy trade-offs in motor behavior: Theories of impulse variability. In: Motor Behavior. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1985, pp. 79–123.
Schoenfeld BJ, Wilson JM, Lowery RP, Krieger JW. Muscular adaptations in low- versus high-load resistance training: A meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 16: 1–10, 2016.
Sheppard JM, Triplett NT. Program design for resistance training (Chapter 17). In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (4th ed.). Haff GG, Triplett NT, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2015. pp. 453.
Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S. Smatr 3– an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol Evol 3: 257–259, 2012.
Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, et al. Novel resistance training–specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. J Strength Cond Res 30: 267–275, 2016.