SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in the general population and high-risk occupational groups across 18 cities in Iran: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Adult
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
COVID-19 Testing
Cities
/ statistics & numerical data
Cross-Sectional Studies
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G
/ blood
Immunoglobulin M
/ blood
Iran
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Prevalence
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Young Adult
Journal
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
16
07
2020
revised:
15
10
2020
accepted:
26
10
2020
pubmed:
19
12
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
18
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rapid increases in cases of COVID-19 were observed in multiple cities in Iran towards the start of the pandemic. However, the true infection rate remains unknown. We aimed to assess the seroprevalence of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 18 cities of Iran as an indicator of the infection rate. In this population-based cross-sectional study, we randomly selected and invited study participants from the general population (from lists of people registered with the Iranian electronic health record system or health-care centres) and a high-risk population of individuals likely to have close social contact with SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals through their occupation (from employee lists provided by relevant agencies or companies, such as supermarket chains) across 18 cities in 17 Iranian provinces. Participants were asked questions on their demographic characteristics, medical history, recent COVID-19-related symptoms, and COVID-19-related exposures. Iran Food and Drug Administration-approved Pishtaz Teb SARS-CoV-2 ELISA kits were used to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibodies in blood samples from participants. Seroprevalence was estimated on the basis of ELISA test results and adjusted for population weighting (by age, sex, and city population size) and test performance (according to our independent validation of sensitivity and specificity). From 9181 individuals who were initially contacted between April 17 and June 2, 2020, 243 individuals refused to provide blood samples and 36 did not provide demographic information and were excluded from the analysis. Among the 8902 individuals included in the analysis, 5372 had occupations with a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and 3530 were recruited from the general population. The overall population weight-adjusted and test performance-adjusted prevalence of antibody seropositivity in the general population was 17·1% (95% CI 14·6-19·5), implying that 4 265 542 (95% CI 3 659 043-4 887 078) individuals from the 18 cities included were infected by the end of April, 2020. The adjusted seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies varied greatly by city, with the highest estimates found in Rasht (72·6% [53·9-92·8]) and Qom (58·5% [37·2-83·9]). The overall population weight-adjusted and test performance-adjusted seroprevalence in the high-risk population was 20·0% (18·5-21·7) and showed little variation between the occupations included. Seroprevalence is likely to be much higher than the reported prevalence of COVID-19 based on confirmed COVID-19 cases in Iran. Despite high seroprevalence in a few cities, a large proportion of the population is still uninfected. The potential shortcomings of current public health policies should therefore be identified to prevent future epidemic waves in Iran. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. For the Farsi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rapid increases in cases of COVID-19 were observed in multiple cities in Iran towards the start of the pandemic. However, the true infection rate remains unknown. We aimed to assess the seroprevalence of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 18 cities of Iran as an indicator of the infection rate.
METHODS
In this population-based cross-sectional study, we randomly selected and invited study participants from the general population (from lists of people registered with the Iranian electronic health record system or health-care centres) and a high-risk population of individuals likely to have close social contact with SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals through their occupation (from employee lists provided by relevant agencies or companies, such as supermarket chains) across 18 cities in 17 Iranian provinces. Participants were asked questions on their demographic characteristics, medical history, recent COVID-19-related symptoms, and COVID-19-related exposures. Iran Food and Drug Administration-approved Pishtaz Teb SARS-CoV-2 ELISA kits were used to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibodies in blood samples from participants. Seroprevalence was estimated on the basis of ELISA test results and adjusted for population weighting (by age, sex, and city population size) and test performance (according to our independent validation of sensitivity and specificity).
FINDINGS
From 9181 individuals who were initially contacted between April 17 and June 2, 2020, 243 individuals refused to provide blood samples and 36 did not provide demographic information and were excluded from the analysis. Among the 8902 individuals included in the analysis, 5372 had occupations with a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and 3530 were recruited from the general population. The overall population weight-adjusted and test performance-adjusted prevalence of antibody seropositivity in the general population was 17·1% (95% CI 14·6-19·5), implying that 4 265 542 (95% CI 3 659 043-4 887 078) individuals from the 18 cities included were infected by the end of April, 2020. The adjusted seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies varied greatly by city, with the highest estimates found in Rasht (72·6% [53·9-92·8]) and Qom (58·5% [37·2-83·9]). The overall population weight-adjusted and test performance-adjusted seroprevalence in the high-risk population was 20·0% (18·5-21·7) and showed little variation between the occupations included.
INTERPRETATIONS
Seroprevalence is likely to be much higher than the reported prevalence of COVID-19 based on confirmed COVID-19 cases in Iran. Despite high seroprevalence in a few cities, a large proportion of the population is still uninfected. The potential shortcomings of current public health policies should therefore be identified to prevent future epidemic waves in Iran.
FUNDING
Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
TRANSLATION
For the Farsi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33338441
pii: S1473-3099(20)30858-6
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30858-6
pmc: PMC7833828
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
473-481Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2425-2427
pubmed: 32421144
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):636-638
pubmed: 33349310
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 9;:
pubmed: 33298533
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Mar - Apr;34:101623
pubmed: 32179124
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;48:23-29.e4
pubmed: 32648546
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2020 Dec 31;5(4):223-234
pubmed: 36340059
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1896
pubmed: 32563363
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):535-544
pubmed: 32645347
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406-1407
pubmed: 32083643
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677
pubmed: 32240634
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987
pubmed: 32497510
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):410-419
pubmed: 33615345
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:29-31
pubmed: 32171951
Syst Dyn Rev. 2020 Jan-Mar;36(1):101-129
pubmed: 32834468