Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy.
acute cholecystitis
common bile duct stone
guidewire
malignant biliary obstruction
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Dec 2020
16 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2020
revised:
04
12
2020
accepted:
11
12
2020
entrez:
19
12
2020
pubmed:
20
12
2020
medline:
20
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange. A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange ( The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through.
METHODS
METHODS
Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33339093
pii: jcm9124059
doi: 10.3390/jcm9124059
pmc: PMC7765498
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jun 25;:
pubmed: 32588249
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):588-90
pubmed: 19555937
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9182-8
pubmed: 26290646
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):362-72, 372.e1
pubmed: 22248605
Dig Endosc. 2018 Mar;30(2):245-251
pubmed: 28722284
Endoscopy. 2011;43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E98-9
pubmed: 21425030
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb 16;9(2):77-84
pubmed: 28250900
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1211-9
pubmed: 19962504
Clin Endosc. 2020 Nov;53(6):678-685
pubmed: 31914724
Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):E349-E351
pubmed: 31174219
Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):442-9
pubmed: 23937334
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 14;17(46):5131-2
pubmed: 22171149
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 May;71(6):1038-45
pubmed: 20438890
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jul;27(7):429-436
pubmed: 32352636
Clin Endosc. 2020 Jan;53(1):65-72
pubmed: 31382731
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):788-91
pubmed: 21676663
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:5825230
pubmed: 27446851