Comparing the Scope and Efficacy of COVID-19 Response Strategies in 16 Countries: An Overview.
COVID-19
case studies
comparison
coronavirus
epidemic response
public health
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 12 2020
16 12 2020
Historique:
received:
17
10
2020
revised:
29
11
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
19
12
2020
pubmed:
20
12
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This article synthesizes the results of case studies on the development of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and control measures by governments in 16 countries. When this work was conducted, only 6 months had passed since the pandemic began, and only 4 months since the first events were recognized outside of China. It was too early to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of measures in each of the selected countries; however, the authors present some efforts to identify and classify response and containment measures, country-by-country, for future comparison and analysis. There is a significant variety of policy tools and response measures employed in different countries, and while it is still hard to directly compare the different approaches based on their efficacy, it will definitely provide many inputs for the future data analysis efforts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33339119
pii: ijerph17249421
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249421
pmc: PMC7765483
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Nephrol. 2020 Apr;33(2):193-196
pubmed: 32207068
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1470-1477
pubmed: 32255761
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675
pubmed: 32296168
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 30;17(9):
pubmed: 32365891