Engineering Biophysical Cues for Controlled 3D Differentiation of Endoderm Derivatives.


Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
entrez: 19 12 2020
pubmed: 20 12 2020
medline: 1 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biophysical cues synergize with biochemical cues to drive differentiation of pluripotent stem cells through specific phenotypic trajectory. Tools to manipulate the cell biophysical environment and identify the influence of specific environment perturbation in the presence of combinatorial inputs will be critical to control the development trajectory. Here we describe the procedure to perturb biophysical environment of pluripotent stem cells while maintaining them in 3D culture configuration. We also discuss a high-throughput platform for combinatorial perturbation of the cell microenvironment, and detail a statistical procedure to extract dominant environmental influences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33340355
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1174-6_6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alginates 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

73-92

Références

Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW (2009) Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324(5935):1673–1677
pubmed: 19556500 pmcid: 2847855
Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751):1139–1143
pubmed: 16293750
Christopherson GT, Song H, Mao HQ (2009) The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 30(4):556–564
pubmed: 18977025
Guilak F et al (2009) Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1):17–26
pubmed: 19570510 pmcid: 2768283
Lee DA et al (2011) Stem cell mechanobiology. J Cell Biochem 112(1):1–9
pubmed: 20626029
Reilly GC, Engler AJ (2010) Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J Biomech 43(1):55–62
pubmed: 19800626
Gasiorowski JZ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF (2013) Biophysical cues and cell behavior: the big impact of little things. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:155–176
pubmed: 23862676
Engler AJ et al (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4):677–689
pubmed: 16923388
Candiello J et al (2013) Early differentiation patterning of mouse embryonic stem cells in response to variations in alginate substrate stiffness. J Biol Eng 7(1):9
pubmed: 23570553 pmcid: 3643844
Jaramillo M et al (2015) Inducing endoderm differentiation by modulating mechanical properties of soft substrates. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 9(1):1–12
pubmed: 23008262
Task K et al (2014) Systems level approach reveals the correlation of endoderm differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells with specific microstructural cues of fibrin gels. J R Soc Interface 11(95):20140009
pubmed: 24718448 pmcid: 4006239
Zhang XN et al (2012) Analysis of regulatory network involved in mechanical induction of embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS One 7(4):e35700
pubmed: 22558203 pmcid: 3338716
Richardson T, Kumta PN, Banerjee I (2014) Alginate encapsulation of human embryonic stem cells to enhance directed differentiation to pancreatic islet-like cells. Tissue Eng Part A 20(23–24):3198–3211
pubmed: 24881778 pmcid: 4259202
Richardson T et al (2016) Capsule stiffness regulates the efficiency of pancreatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Acta Biomater 35:153–165
pubmed: 26911881
Lee LH et al (2009) Micropatterning of human embryonic stem cells dissects the mesoderm and endoderm lineages. Stem Cell Res 2(2):155–162
pubmed: 19383420
Flaim CJ, Chien S, Bhatia SN (2005) An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Methods 2(2):119–125
pubmed: 15782209
Derda R et al (2010) High-throughput discovery of synthetic surfaces that support proliferation of pluripotent cells. J Am Chem Soc 132(4):1289–1295
pubmed: 20067240 pmcid: 2819098
Ankam S et al (2013) Substrate topography and size determine the fate of human embryonic stem cells to neuronal or glial lineage. Acta Biomater 9(1):4535–4545
pubmed: 22906625
Ranga A et al (2014) 3D niche microarrays for systems-level analyses of cell fate. Nat Commun 5:4324
pubmed: 25027775 pmcid: 4104440
Huang X et al (2012) Microenvironment of alginate-based microcapsules for cell culture and tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng 114(1):1–8
pubmed: 22561878
Morch YA et al (2006) Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromolecules 7(5):1471–1480
pubmed: 16677028
Chan ES et al (2011) Effect of formulation of alginate beads on their mechanical behavior and stiffness. Particuology 9(3):228–234
Lee BH, Li B, Guelcher SA (2012) Gel microstructure regulates proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells encapsulated in alginate beads. Acta Biomater 8(5):1693–1702
pubmed: 22306825 pmcid: 3314144
Banerjee A et al (2009) The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 30(27):4695–4699
pubmed: 19539367 pmcid: 2743317
Musah S et al (2012) Glycosaminoglycan-binding hydrogels enable mechanical control of human pluripotent stem cell self-renewal. ACS Nano 6(11):10168–10177
pubmed: 23005914 pmcid: 3509190
Richardson TC et al (2018) Development of an alginate array platform to decouple the effect of multiparametric perturbations on human pluripotent stem cells during pancreatic differentiation. Biotechnol J 13(2):1700099
Mathew S et al (2012) Analysis of alternative signaling pathways of endoderm induction of human embryonic stem cells identifies context specific differences. BMC Syst Biol 6:154
pubmed: 23241383 pmcid: 3547704

Auteurs

Thomas Richardson (T)

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lonza, Houston, Texas, PA, USA.

Shibin Mathew (S)

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pfiezer, Boston, MA, USA.

Connor Wiegand (C)

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Kevin Pietz (K)

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Joseph Candiello (J)

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
RoosterBio, Frederick, MD, USA.

K Ravikumar (K)

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Ipsita Banerjee (I)

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ipb1@pitt.edu.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ipb1@pitt.edu.
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ipb1@pitt.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH