Treatment recommendations to parents during pediatric tonsillectomy consultations: A mixed methods analysis of surgeon language.
Communication
Patient-centered
Pediatrics
Shared decision-making
Tonsillectomy
Journal
Patient education and counseling
ISSN: 1873-5134
Titre abrégé: Patient Educ Couns
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8406280
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
17
07
2020
revised:
19
10
2020
accepted:
11
11
2020
pubmed:
22
12
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
21
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A deeper understanding of the dialogue clinicians use to relay treatment recommendations is needed to fully understand their influence on patient decisions about surgery. We characterize how otolaryngologists provide treatment recommendations and suggest a classification framework. We qualitatively analyzed surgeon recommendations from 55 encounters between otolaryngologists and parents of children evaluated for tonsillectomy, and classified recommendation types by phrasing. Multilevel logistic regression identified predictors of recommendation phrasing. Clinicians provided 183 recommendations (mean/visit = 3.3). We identified four domains of recommendation-phrasing (direct, passive, acceptable, parent-oriented). Direct recommendations (n = 68, 37%) included presumptive statements phrasing intentions as inevitable. Passive recommendations (n = 65, 36%) included practice-based recommendations utilizing general statements. Acceptable recommendations (n = 29, 16%) included speaking positively about treatment options. Parent-oriented recommendations (n = 21, 11%) included parent choice statements. Clinicians more commonly made direct recommendations to parents who were racial minorities (OR = 2.7, p = .02, 95% CI [1.7, 5.9]) or had an annual income <$50,000 (OR = 2.2, p = .03, 95% CI [1.1, 4.4]). Clinicians provide treatment recommendations in a variety of ways that may introduce more or less certainty and choice to parental treatment decisions. Findings may be implemented into training which increases clinician awareness of dialogue use when recommending treatment alternatives to patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33342578
pii: S0738-3991(20)30639-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Pagination
1371-1379Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS022932
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of competing interest The authors report no declarations of interest.