Evaluation of Synergy Extrapolation for Predicting Unmeasured Muscle Excitations from Measured Muscle Synergies.

EMG normalization EMG-driven modeling muscle excitation muscle synergy non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) principal component analysis (PCA) stroke

Journal

Frontiers in computational neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5188
Titre abrégé: Front Comput Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477956

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 29 07 2020
accepted: 09 11 2020
entrez: 21 12 2020
pubmed: 22 12 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal modeling relies on high-quality measurements of muscle electrical activity to estimate muscle forces. However, a critical challenge for practical deployment of this approach is missing EMG data from muscles that contribute substantially to joint moments. This situation may arise due to either the inability to measure deep muscles with surface electrodes or the lack of a sufficient number of EMG channels. Muscle synergy analysis (MSA) is a dimensionality reduction approach that decomposes a large number of muscle excitations into a small number of time-varying synergy excitations along with time-invariant synergy weights that define the contribution of each synergy excitation to all muscle excitations. This study evaluates how well missing muscle excitations can be predicted using synergy excitations extracted from muscles with available EMG data (henceforth called "synergy extrapolation" or SynX). The method was evaluated using a gait data set collected from a stroke survivor walking on an instrumented treadmill at self-selected and fastest-comfortable speeds. The evaluation process started with full calibration of a lower-body EMG-driven model using 16 measured EMG channels (collected using surface and fine wire electrodes) per leg. One fine wire EMG channel (either iliopsoas or adductor longus) was then treated as unmeasured. The synergy weights associated with the unmeasured muscle excitation were predicted by solving a nonlinear optimization problem where the errors between inverse dynamics and EMG-driven joint moments were minimized. The prediction process was performed for different synergy analysis algorithms (principal component analysis and non-negative matrix factorization), EMG normalization methods, and numbers of synergies. SynX performance was most influenced by the choice of synergy analysis algorithm and number of synergies. Principal component analysis with five or six synergies consistently predicted unmeasured muscle excitations the most accurately and with the greatest robustness to EMG normalization method. Furthermore, the associated joint moment matching accuracy was comparable to that produced by initial EMG-driven model calibration using all 16 EMG channels per leg. SynX may facilitate the assessment of human neuromuscular control and biomechanics when important EMG signals are missing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33343322
doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.588943
pmc: PMC7746870
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

588943

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Ao, Shourijeh, Patten and Fregly.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jan 1;140(1):
pubmed: 29049521
J Biomech. 2003 Aug;36(8):1197-202
pubmed: 12831746
J Biomech. 2003 Jun;36(6):765-76
pubmed: 12742444
J Neural Eng. 2009 Jun;6(3):036004
pubmed: 19436081
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11):1911-6
pubmed: 16286861
Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Feb;38(2):269-79
pubmed: 19957039
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jul 26;14(7):e1006223
pubmed: 30048444
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):290-302
pubmed: 27852733
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:98-103
pubmed: 31751916
J Biomech. 1981;14(11):793-801
pubmed: 7334039
J Biomech. 2012 Aug 9;45(12):2157-63
pubmed: 22727468
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Nov;54(11):1940-50
pubmed: 18018689
J Biomech. 2015 Nov 5;48(14):3929-36
pubmed: 26522621
Biol Cybern. 1995 Oct;73(5):409-14
pubmed: 7578478
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Feb;25(1):89-97
pubmed: 24372591
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):844-57
pubmed: 20007501
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):609-13
pubmed: 15342720
Med Eng Phys. 2018 Jul;57:51-60
pubmed: 29703696
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52618
pubmed: 23300725
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3426-37
pubmed: 16554517
Biol Cybern. 2002 Jun;86(6):445-56
pubmed: 12111273
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 May;24(4):328-37
pubmed: 19794132
J Biomech. 2001 Feb;34(2):153-61
pubmed: 11165278
Nature. 1999 Oct 21;401(6755):788-91
pubmed: 10548103
J Biomech. 2005 Mar;38(3):621-6
pubmed: 15652563
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Nov 1;125(5):1404-1410
pubmed: 29975604
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Aug 31;11:78
pubmed: 28912707
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 11;12(7):e0179698
pubmed: 28700708
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17(4):359-411
pubmed: 2676342
J Biomech. 2010 Apr 19;43(6):1055-60
pubmed: 20074736
J Biomech. 2014 Nov 28;47(15):3613-21
pubmed: 25458151
J Biomech. 2004 Sep;37(9):1447-53
pubmed: 15275854
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jul;28(6):697-704
pubmed: 23830138
J Biomech. 2004 Sep;37(9):1393-404
pubmed: 15275847
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Aug;41:116-123
pubmed: 29879693
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Feb;26:36-43
pubmed: 26755163
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Oct 01;13:80
pubmed: 31632261
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Aug 08;7:105
pubmed: 23964232
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;123(9):1895-6
pubmed: 22342685
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2144-56
pubmed: 17652413
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Jul 25;:
pubmed: 31343670
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Mar 30;9:18
pubmed: 22463378
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Mar;6(3):300-8
pubmed: 12563264
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 23;8:335
pubmed: 24904375
Gait Posture. 2007 Jul;26(2):279-88
pubmed: 17071088
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Aug;30(4):415-21
pubmed: 23912583
Comput Biol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):1083-8
pubmed: 19818436
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Jul 17;13:54
pubmed: 31379550
J Biomech. 2003 Mar;36(3):321-8
pubmed: 12594980
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2199-212
pubmed: 16394079
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Jan;67(1):134-145
pubmed: 30951461
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 18;14:40
pubmed: 32132911
Front Physiol. 2019 Oct 10;10:1283
pubmed: 31649557
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Jun 06;11:50
pubmed: 28634449
Front Neurorobot. 2017 Mar 17;11:15
pubmed: 28367121
J Orthop Res. 2012 Apr;30(4):503-13
pubmed: 22161745
J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 3;25(31):7238-53
pubmed: 16079406
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Mar;109(6):1548-70
pubmed: 23236008
J Biomech Eng. 2014 Feb;136(2):021031
pubmed: 24402438
J Orthop Res. 2012 Mar;30(3):377-83
pubmed: 21901754
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016 Oct 13;4:77
pubmed: 27790612
J Biomech. 2019 Jun 11;90:84-91
pubmed: 31101431
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):162-7
pubmed: 10195201
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Oct;20(8):863-70
pubmed: 16005555

Auteurs

Di Ao (D)

Rice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.

Mohammad S Shourijeh (MS)

Rice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.

Carolynn Patten (C)

Biomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience (BRaIN) Lab, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA, United States.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Benjamin J Fregly (BJ)

Rice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.

Classifications MeSH