Comminuted patellar fractures: The role of biplanar fixed angle plate constructs.
Biomechanics
Comminuted fracture
Mesh plate
Patella
Tension band wiring
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic translation
ISSN: 2214-031X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Translat
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101625127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
revised:
02
09
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
entrez:
21
12
2020
pubmed:
22
12
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Comminuted patellar fractures represent a challenging clinical problem. Treatment aims to restore the integrity of the extensor mechanism and the congruity of patellofemoral joint. Controversy exists regarding the ideal fixation method. Metallic constructs aiming to convert pulling forces on the anterior aspect of the patella into compression forces across the fracture site are the standard of care. More recently, low profile plates have been described in the management of comminuted patellar fractures. The aims of this study were to (1) develop a novel unstable patellar fracture model and (2) to compare biomechanically three different constructs for fixation comminuted patellar fractures. We hypothesized that an orthogonal biplanar disposition of the screws within an anteriorly placed locking plate provides the best biomechanical properties in the management of comminuted fractures. Six-part complex AO 34-C3 patella fractures were simulated in 18 human cadaveric knees by means of osteotomies including comminution around the distal patellar pole. The specimens were randomly assigned to 3 fixation techniques (n = 6) for either anterior plating, antero-lateral plating, or tension band wiring (TBW). Biomechanical testing was performed over 5000 cycles in active extension and passive flexion, followed by ultimate destructive quasi-static testing. Interfragmentary movements were captured by means of optical motion tracking. Displacement between the proximal and distal medial patella fragments was lower after anterior plating compared to both antero-lateral plating (P = 0.084) and TBW (P < 0.001). Moreover, displacement between the proximal and distal lateral fragments was significantly lower after anterior plating compared to both other techniques (P ≤ 0.032). In addition, it was significantly lower for antero-lateral plating versus TBW (P < 0.001). Rotation around the medio-lateral axis between the proximal and distal medial fragments was significantly lower after anterior plating compared to TBW (P = 0.017). Anterior mesh plating with biplanar placement of locking screws provides superior stability for fixation of comminuted patellar fractures when compared to both antero-lateral mesh plating and TBW. The latter is associated with considerably inferior performance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Comminuted patellar fractures represent a challenging clinical problem. Treatment aims to restore the integrity of the extensor mechanism and the congruity of patellofemoral joint. Controversy exists regarding the ideal fixation method. Metallic constructs aiming to convert pulling forces on the anterior aspect of the patella into compression forces across the fracture site are the standard of care. More recently, low profile plates have been described in the management of comminuted patellar fractures. The aims of this study were to (1) develop a novel unstable patellar fracture model and (2) to compare biomechanically three different constructs for fixation comminuted patellar fractures. We hypothesized that an orthogonal biplanar disposition of the screws within an anteriorly placed locking plate provides the best biomechanical properties in the management of comminuted fractures.
METHODS
METHODS
Six-part complex AO 34-C3 patella fractures were simulated in 18 human cadaveric knees by means of osteotomies including comminution around the distal patellar pole. The specimens were randomly assigned to 3 fixation techniques (n = 6) for either anterior plating, antero-lateral plating, or tension band wiring (TBW). Biomechanical testing was performed over 5000 cycles in active extension and passive flexion, followed by ultimate destructive quasi-static testing. Interfragmentary movements were captured by means of optical motion tracking.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Displacement between the proximal and distal medial patella fragments was lower after anterior plating compared to both antero-lateral plating (P = 0.084) and TBW (P < 0.001). Moreover, displacement between the proximal and distal lateral fragments was significantly lower after anterior plating compared to both other techniques (P ≤ 0.032). In addition, it was significantly lower for antero-lateral plating versus TBW (P < 0.001). Rotation around the medio-lateral axis between the proximal and distal medial fragments was significantly lower after anterior plating compared to TBW (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Anterior mesh plating with biplanar placement of locking screws provides superior stability for fixation of comminuted patellar fractures when compared to both antero-lateral mesh plating and TBW. The latter is associated with considerably inferior performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33344168
doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.10.003
pii: S2214-031X(20)30115-7
pmc: PMC7732873
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17-24Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this article.
Références
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e305-8
pubmed: 26299810
Injury. 2012 Aug;43(8):1290-5
pubmed: 22608600
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):e504-10
pubmed: 26270460
Injury. 2015;46(6):1001-6
pubmed: 25769202
Helv Chir Acta. 1961 Mar;28:198-206
pubmed: 13773536
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Sep;28(9):e231-5
pubmed: 24343252
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Dec;24(10):855-9
pubmed: 19716216
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Jul;51(4):337-341
pubmed: 28554845
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jul;11(5):351-6
pubmed: 9294799
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jun-Jul;12(5):356-9
pubmed: 9671189
Acta Orthop Scand. 1972;43(2):126-37
pubmed: 5079747
Injury. 2003 Nov;34 Suppl 2:B31-42
pubmed: 14580984
Injury. 2016 Aug;47(8):1737-43
pubmed: 27354301
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(3):208-14
pubmed: 21729636
Instr Course Lect. 1994;43:97-108
pubmed: 9097140
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1749-1757
pubmed: 28622833
J Orthop Res. 1984;2(1):49-54
pubmed: 6491798
Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 1;40(4):e739-e743
pubmed: 28632289