How ICU Patient Severity Affects Communicative Interactions Between Healthcare Professionals: A Study Utilizing Wearable Sociometric Badges.
communication
critical care
human behavior
inter-professional collaboration
wearable
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
09
2020
accepted:
10
11
2020
entrez:
21
12
2020
pubmed:
22
12
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous factors affecting the interactions between healthcare professionals in the workplace demand a comprehensive understanding if the quality of patient healthcare is to be improved. Our previous cross-sectional analysis showed that patient severity scores [i.e., Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II] in the 24 h following admission positively correlated with the length of the face-to-face interactions among ICU healthcare professionals. The present study aims to address how the relationships between patient severity and interaction lengths can change over a period of time during both admission and treatment in the ICU. We retrospectively analyzed data prospectively collected between 19 February to 17 March 2016 from an open ICU in a University Hospital in Japan. We used wearable sensors to collect a spatiotemporal distribution dataset documenting the face-to-face interactions between ICU healthcare professionals, which involved 76 ICU staff members, each of whom worked for 160 h, on average, during the 4-week period of data collection. We studied the longitudinal relationships among these interactions, which occurred at the patient bedside, vis-à-vis the severity of the patient's condition [i.e., the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score] assessed every 24 h. On Day 1, during which a total of 117 patients stayed in the ICU, we found statistically significant positive associations between the interaction lengths and their SOFA scores, as shown by the Spearman's correlation coefficient value (R) of 0.447 (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33344484
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.606987
pmc: PMC7744931
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
606987Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Kawamoto, Ito-Masui, Esumi, Imai and Shimaoka.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Electron Physician. 2016 Mar 25;8(3):2123-8
pubmed: 27123221
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300
pubmed: 28114553
Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):5-10
pubmed: 21199549
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Oct;32(5):541-547
pubmed: 28606198
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 12;13(10):e0204819
pubmed: 30312326
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17144
pubmed: 21386902
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):686-96
pubmed: 10470572
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2943-57
pubmed: 27550739
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8
pubmed: 11594901
Heart Lung. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):409-17
pubmed: 8886817
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1752-1758
pubmed: 28112476
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0135740
pubmed: 26313449
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):209-216
pubmed: 26984966
Emotion. 2017 Dec;17(8):1166-1180
pubmed: 28358560
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD000072
pubmed: 28639262
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Mar;11(1):28-33
pubmed: 19281441
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41
pubmed: 17327525
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97
pubmed: 27532315
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan 15;201(2):245-247
pubmed: 31545651
Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1988-93
pubmed: 16148470
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Apr;36(4):290-293
pubmed: 30134736
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):225-39
pubmed: 20647929
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e114681
pubmed: 25501748