Phase-Dependency of Medial-Lateral Balance Responses to Sensory Perturbations During Walking.
balance
galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS)
motor control
phase dependence
virtual reality
walking
Journal
Frontiers in sports and active living
ISSN: 2624-9367
Titre abrégé: Front Sports Act Living
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101765780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2019
accepted:
28
08
2019
entrez:
21
12
2020
pubmed:
27
9
2019
medline:
27
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The human body is mechanically unstable during walking. Maintaining upright stability requires constant regulation of muscle force by the central nervous system to push against the ground and move the body mass in the desired way. Activation of muscles in the lower body in response to sensory or mechanical perturbations during walking is usually highly phase-dependent, because the effect any specific muscle force has on the body movement depends upon the body configuration. Yet the resulting movement patterns of the upper body after the same perturbations are largely phase-independent. This is puzzling, because any change of upper-body movement must be generated by parts of the lower body pushing against the ground. How do phase-dependent muscle activation patterns along the lower body generate phase-independent movement patterns of the upper body? We hypothesize that when a sensory system detects a deviation of the body in space from a desired state that indicates the onset of a fall, the nervous system generates a functional response by pushing against the ground in any way possible with the current body configuration. This predicts that the changes in the ground reaction force patterns following a balance perturbation should be phase-independent. Here we test this hypothesis by disturbing upright balance in the frontal plane using Galvanic vestibular stimulation at three different points in the gait cycle. We measure the resulting changes in whole-body center of mass movement and the location of the center of pressure of the ground reaction force. We find that the magnitude of the initial center of pressure shift in the direction of the perceived fall is larger for perturbations late in the gait cycle, while there is no statistically significant difference in onset time. These results contradict our hypothesis by showing that even the initial CoP shift in response to a balance perturbation depends upon the phase of the gait cycle. Contrary to expectation, we also find that the whole-body balance response is not phase-independent. Both the onset time and the magnitude of the whole-body center of mass shift depend on the phase of the perturbation. We conclude that the central nervous system recruits any available mechanism to generate a functional balance response by pushing against the ground as fast as possible in response to a perturbation, but that the different mechanisms available at different phases in the gait cycle are not equally strong, leading to phase-dependent differences in the overall response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33344949
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00025
pmc: PMC7739817
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
25Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Reimann, Fettrow, Grenet, Thompson and Jeka.
Références
J Exp Biol. 2016 May 15;219(Pt 10):1514-23
pubmed: 26994171
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb;57:69-82
pubmed: 29174418
J Biomech. 2005 Jan;38(1):1-8
pubmed: 15519333
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1097-118
pubmed: 12205132
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):617-56
pubmed: 17617481
J Physiol. 2015 Aug 15;593(16):3493-511
pubmed: 25920414
J Biomech. 2007;40(10):2150-7
pubmed: 17169365
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Jun;15(143):
pubmed: 29875279
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;92(3):1269-75
pubmed: 15102904
Biol Cybern. 1999 May;80(5):299-308
pubmed: 10365423
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;82(3):1622-6
pubmed: 10482776
Biol Lett. 2014 Sep;10(9):
pubmed: 25252834
Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):478-84
pubmed: 24055003
J Neurophysiol. 1990 May;63(5):1109-17
pubmed: 2358865
J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;31(42):15144-53
pubmed: 22016548
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 May 01;12:43
pubmed: 25928176
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1411-9
pubmed: 19553493
Exp Brain Res. 2006 May;171(2):231-50
pubmed: 16307252
Biol Cybern. 2000 Apr;82(4):335-43
pubmed: 10804065
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172215
pubmed: 28234936
J Exp Biol. 2010 Aug 1;213(Pt 15):2655-64
pubmed: 20639427
J Biomech. 2007;40(3):543-53
pubmed: 16616757
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010 Jun;18(3):263-73
pubmed: 20378480
Biol Cybern. 1998 Jan;78(1):9-17
pubmed: 9485584
J Safety Res. 2016 Sep;58:99-103
pubmed: 27620939
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):151-66
pubmed: 17031681
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun;55(6):1369-81
pubmed: 3734861
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jul 1;112(1):165-80
pubmed: 24717345
Front Physiol. 2018 Sep 13;9:1271
pubmed: 30271354
Prog Neurobiol. 1999 Jun;58(2):185-205
pubmed: 10338359
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;110(1):86-94
pubmed: 23576695
J Neurophysiol. 2019 May 1;121(5):1711-1717
pubmed: 30864874
J Biomech. 1999 Feb;32(2):129-34
pubmed: 10052917
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Feb;27(1):112-25
pubmed: 17935808
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;57(12):1532-4
pubmed: 7798986
J Biomech. 1990;23(6):617-21
pubmed: 2341423