Identifying the axillary nerve during shoulder surgery: an anatomic study using advanced imaging.

Latarjet Shoulder arthroplasty arthroscopy axillary injury nerve

Journal

JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez: 21 12 2020
pubmed: 22 12 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The axillary nerve (AXN) is one of the more commonly injured nerves during shoulder surgery. Prior anatomic studies of the AXN in adults were performed using cadaveric specimens with small sample sizes. Our research observes a larger cohort of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in order to gain a more representative sample of the course of the AXN and aid surgeons intraoperatively. High-resolution 3T MRI studies performed at our institution from January 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed. Four blinded reviewers with musculoskeletal radiology or orthopedic surgery training measured the distance of the AXN to the surgical neck of the humerus (SNH), the lateral tip of the acromion (LTA), and the inferior glenoid rim (IGR). Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess reliability between reviewers. The nerve location was assessed relative to rotator cuff tear status. A total of 257 shoulder MRIs were included. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.80 for the SNH, 0.90 for the LTA, and 0.94 for the IGR. All intraobserver reliabilities were above 0.80. The mean distance from the AXN to SNH was 1.7 cm (range, 0.7-3.1 cm; interquartile range, 1.38-2.00) and that from the AXN to IGR was 1.6 cm (range, 0.6-2.6 cm; interquartile range, 1.33-1.88). The mean AXN to LTA distance was 7.1 cm, with a range of 5.2-9.0 cm across patient heights; there was a large effect size related to the LTA to AXN distance and patient height with a correlation of The AXN is vulnerable to injury during both open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. This injury can be either a result of direct trauma to the nerve or secondary to traction placed on the nerve with reconstructive procedures that distalize the humerus. Our study demonstrates that the AXN can be found as little as 5.6 mm from the IGR and 6.9 mm from the SNH. In addition, we illustrate the relationship between patient height and the LTA to AXN distance and complete rotator cuff tears and the SNH to AXN distance. Our study is the first to demonstrate the nerve's proximity to important surgical landmarks of the shoulder using a large sample size of high-resolution images in living human shoulders.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The axillary nerve (AXN) is one of the more commonly injured nerves during shoulder surgery. Prior anatomic studies of the AXN in adults were performed using cadaveric specimens with small sample sizes. Our research observes a larger cohort of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in order to gain a more representative sample of the course of the AXN and aid surgeons intraoperatively.
METHODS METHODS
High-resolution 3T MRI studies performed at our institution from January 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed. Four blinded reviewers with musculoskeletal radiology or orthopedic surgery training measured the distance of the AXN to the surgical neck of the humerus (SNH), the lateral tip of the acromion (LTA), and the inferior glenoid rim (IGR). Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess reliability between reviewers. The nerve location was assessed relative to rotator cuff tear status.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 257 shoulder MRIs were included. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.80 for the SNH, 0.90 for the LTA, and 0.94 for the IGR. All intraobserver reliabilities were above 0.80. The mean distance from the AXN to SNH was 1.7 cm (range, 0.7-3.1 cm; interquartile range, 1.38-2.00) and that from the AXN to IGR was 1.6 cm (range, 0.6-2.6 cm; interquartile range, 1.33-1.88). The mean AXN to LTA distance was 7.1 cm, with a range of 5.2-9.0 cm across patient heights; there was a large effect size related to the LTA to AXN distance and patient height with a correlation of
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The AXN is vulnerable to injury during both open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. This injury can be either a result of direct trauma to the nerve or secondary to traction placed on the nerve with reconstructive procedures that distalize the humerus. Our study demonstrates that the AXN can be found as little as 5.6 mm from the IGR and 6.9 mm from the SNH. In addition, we illustrate the relationship between patient height and the LTA to AXN distance and complete rotator cuff tears and the SNH to AXN distance. Our study is the first to demonstrate the nerve's proximity to important surgical landmarks of the shoulder using a large sample size of high-resolution images in living human shoulders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33345245
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.06.011
pii: S2666-6383(20)30093-1
pmc: PMC7738427
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

987-991

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Références

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1473-80
pubmed: 24950948
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):92-6
pubmed: 2323152
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1555-1564
pubmed: 32109573
JSES Open Access. 2019 Mar 15;3(1):48-53
pubmed: 30984892
Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(3):127-32
pubmed: 9381311
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):240-4
pubmed: 17097311
Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):26-8
pubmed: 26327791
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun;16(3 Suppl):S2-8
pubmed: 17493556
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1096-1103
pubmed: 32081632
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Sep;(390):244-51
pubmed: 11550872
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S27-33
pubmed: 25518290
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):68-72
pubmed: 27514632
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85
pubmed: 25213827
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Feb;100(1):105-8
pubmed: 24314820
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1476-85
pubmed: 17606786
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):1965-1970
pubmed: 27160460
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2395-9
pubmed: 17079396
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 Jan-Feb;5(1):53-61
pubmed: 8919443
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992 Jan;1(1):31-6
pubmed: 22958968
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008 Sep;291(9):1173-85
pubmed: 18536051
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):AC13-7
pubmed: 25954611
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Feb;70(1):9-11
pubmed: 10191739
Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Apr;6(2):90-4
pubmed: 27582920
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):495-501
pubmed: 22318222
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):2101-2110
pubmed: 31800423
Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Mar;32(3):193-201
pubmed: 19916067
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Mar;8(1):59-66
pubmed: 25644052
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1288-93
pubmed: 21792494
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Feb 1;99(3):256-269
pubmed: 28145957
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 27;14(1):468
pubmed: 31881918
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1122-7
pubmed: 27283371

Auteurs

Michael E Hachadorian (ME)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Brendon C Mitchell (BC)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Matthew Y Siow (MY)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Wilbur Wang (W)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Tracey Bastrom (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.

T Barrett Sullivan (TB)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Brady K Huang (BK)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Eric W Edmonds (EW)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.

William T Kent (WT)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH