PREMIUM: A French prospective multicenter observational study of factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment in first-line KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Cetuximab
/ administration & dosage
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Compliance
Female
Folliculitis
/ epidemiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Paronychia
/ epidemiology
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
/ genetics
Smoking
/ epidemiology
Treatment Outcome
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
accepted:
01
12
2020
entrez:
21
12
2020
pubmed:
22
12
2020
medline:
18
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cetuximab improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with KRAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Few data are available on factors impacting both efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment, which is, in combination with chemotherapy, a standard-of-care first-line treatment regimen for patients with KRAS wt mCRC. PREMIUM is a prospective, French multicenter, observational study that recruited patients with KRAS wt mCRC scheduled to receive cetuximab, with or without first-line chemotherapy, as part of routine clinical practice, between October 28, 2009 and April 5, 2012 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01756625). The main endpoints were the factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment. Predefined efficacy endpoints were PFS and safety. A total of 493 patients were recruited by 94 physicians. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 11 months [9.6-12]. In univariate analyses, ECOG performance status (PS), smoking status, primary tumor location, number of metastatic organs, metastasis resectability, surgery, folliculitis, xerosis and paronychia maximum grade, and acne preventive treatment were statistically significant. In multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratios of multivariate stepwise Cox models), ECOG PS, surgery, xerosis and folliculitis were positive prognostics factors for longer PFS. Among all patients, 69 (14%) were non-compliant. In multivariate analysis, no variables were statistically significant. The safety profile of cetuximab was consistent with previous studies. ECOG PS <2, surgical treatment performed, and maximum grade xerosis or folliculitis developed were predictive factors of cetuximab efficacy on KRAS wt mCRC patients. Unfortunately, we failed in identifying predictive factors for compliance in these patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cetuximab improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with KRAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Few data are available on factors impacting both efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment, which is, in combination with chemotherapy, a standard-of-care first-line treatment regimen for patients with KRAS wt mCRC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
PREMIUM is a prospective, French multicenter, observational study that recruited patients with KRAS wt mCRC scheduled to receive cetuximab, with or without first-line chemotherapy, as part of routine clinical practice, between October 28, 2009 and April 5, 2012 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01756625). The main endpoints were the factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment. Predefined efficacy endpoints were PFS and safety.
RESULTS
A total of 493 patients were recruited by 94 physicians. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 11 months [9.6-12]. In univariate analyses, ECOG performance status (PS), smoking status, primary tumor location, number of metastatic organs, metastasis resectability, surgery, folliculitis, xerosis and paronychia maximum grade, and acne preventive treatment were statistically significant. In multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratios of multivariate stepwise Cox models), ECOG PS, surgery, xerosis and folliculitis were positive prognostics factors for longer PFS. Among all patients, 69 (14%) were non-compliant. In multivariate analysis, no variables were statistically significant. The safety profile of cetuximab was consistent with previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS
ECOG PS <2, surgical treatment performed, and maximum grade xerosis or folliculitis developed were predictive factors of cetuximab efficacy on KRAS wt mCRC patients. Unfortunately, we failed in identifying predictive factors for compliance in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33347495
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243997
pii: PONE-D-20-22560
pmc: PMC7752147
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
KRAS protein, human
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01756625']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0243997Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The PREMIUM study was funded by Merck Serono, France., an affiliate of Merck KGaA Darmstadt, Germany. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors declare no financial, non-financial, professional or personal conflict of interest other than the funding of the study.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):1948-55
pubmed: 19255311
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):194-201
pubmed: 27722750
Anticancer Drugs. 2014 Feb;25(2):212-8
pubmed: 24201305
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):121
pubmed: 29169325
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9
pubmed: 21502544
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2619-2626
pubmed: 22431703
Int J Cancer. 2011 May 1;128(9):2075-84
pubmed: 20635392
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1713-1729
pubmed: 28407110
Chin J Cancer. 2015 Jun 10;34(9):384-93
pubmed: 26111811
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5705-12
pubmed: 19001320
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75
pubmed: 25088940
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):692-700
pubmed: 25605843
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2040-8
pubmed: 18003960
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;106(6):483-92
pubmed: 25798804
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 24;107(3):
pubmed: 25713148
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1755-62
pubmed: 22473155
J Cancer. 2016 Apr 27;7(7):837-45
pubmed: 27162543
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 May 24;11:3059-3063
pubmed: 29872317
Target Oncol. 2013 Sep;8(3):173-181
pubmed: 23321777
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2103-14
pubmed: 21641636
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):22-8
pubmed: 25385741
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3900-8
pubmed: 24849523
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1408-17
pubmed: 19339720
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):834-845
pubmed: 27857020
J BUON. 2018 Dec;23(7):11-18
pubmed: 30722106
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Aug;12(8):637-45
pubmed: 15965730
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1261-70
pubmed: 21383284
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1173-83
pubmed: 26054387
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):663-71
pubmed: 19114683
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 22;10(10):e0140717
pubmed: 26491871
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 20;36(30):3031-3039
pubmed: 30199311
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2648-2657
pubmed: 29045527
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 29;12:438
pubmed: 23020584