A new method for quantitative assessment of hand muscle volume and fat in magnetic resonance images.

Fat quantification Hand muscle Random forest segmentation Rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

BMC rheumatology
ISSN: 2520-1026
Titre abrégé: BMC Rheumatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101738571

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 05 12 2019
accepted: 19 10 2020
entrez: 22 12 2020
pubmed: 23 12 2020
medline: 23 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by systemic inflammation and bone and muscle loss. Recent research showed that obesity facilitates inflammation, but it is unknown if obesity also increases the risk or severity of RA. Further research requires an accurate quantification of muscle volume and fat content. The aim was to develop a reproducible (semi) automated method for hand muscle segmentation and quantification of hand muscle fat content and to reduce the time consuming efforts of manual segmentation. T1 weighted scans were used for muscle segmentation based on a random forest classifier. Optimal segmentation parameters were determined by cross validation with 30 manually segmented hand datasets (gold standard). An operator reviewed the automatically created segmentation and applied corrections if necessary. For fat quantification, the segmentation masks were automatically transferred to MRI Dixon sequences by rigid registration. In total 76 datasets from RA patients were analyzed. Accuracy was validated against the manual gold standard segmentations. Average analysis time per dataset was 10 min, more than 10 times faster compared to manual outlining. All 76 datasets could be analyzed and were accurate as judged by a clinical expert. 69 datasets needed minor manual segmentation corrections. Segmentation accuracy compared to the gold standard (Dice ratio 0.98 ± 0.04, average surface distance 0.04 ± 0.10 mm) and reanalysis precision were excellent. Intra- and inter-operator precision errors were below 0.3% (muscle) and 0.7% (fat). Average Hausdorff distances were higher (1.09 mm), but high values originated from a shift of the analysis VOI by one voxel in scan direction. We presented a novel semi-automated method for quantitative assessment of hand muscles with excellent accuracy and operator precision, which highly reduced a traditional manual segmentation effort. This method may greatly facilitate further MRI image based muscle research of the hands.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by systemic inflammation and bone and muscle loss. Recent research showed that obesity facilitates inflammation, but it is unknown if obesity also increases the risk or severity of RA. Further research requires an accurate quantification of muscle volume and fat content.
METHODS METHODS
The aim was to develop a reproducible (semi) automated method for hand muscle segmentation and quantification of hand muscle fat content and to reduce the time consuming efforts of manual segmentation. T1 weighted scans were used for muscle segmentation based on a random forest classifier. Optimal segmentation parameters were determined by cross validation with 30 manually segmented hand datasets (gold standard). An operator reviewed the automatically created segmentation and applied corrections if necessary. For fat quantification, the segmentation masks were automatically transferred to MRI Dixon sequences by rigid registration. In total 76 datasets from RA patients were analyzed. Accuracy was validated against the manual gold standard segmentations.
RESULTS RESULTS
Average analysis time per dataset was 10 min, more than 10 times faster compared to manual outlining. All 76 datasets could be analyzed and were accurate as judged by a clinical expert. 69 datasets needed minor manual segmentation corrections. Segmentation accuracy compared to the gold standard (Dice ratio 0.98 ± 0.04, average surface distance 0.04 ± 0.10 mm) and reanalysis precision were excellent. Intra- and inter-operator precision errors were below 0.3% (muscle) and 0.7% (fat). Average Hausdorff distances were higher (1.09 mm), but high values originated from a shift of the analysis VOI by one voxel in scan direction.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We presented a novel semi-automated method for quantitative assessment of hand muscles with excellent accuracy and operator precision, which highly reduced a traditional manual segmentation effort. This method may greatly facilitate further MRI image based muscle research of the hands.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33349274
doi: 10.1186/s41927-020-00170-3
pii: 10.1186/s41927-020-00170-3
pmc: PMC7754591
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

72

Subventions

Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01EC1407A

Références

Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Oct;59(10):812-6
pubmed: 11005783
Neural Regen Res. 2018 Oct;13(10):1787-1795
pubmed: 30136694
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 3):66-74
pubmed: 23286115
J Intern Med. 2007 Oct;262(4):408-14
pubmed: 17875176
Med Image Anal. 2004 Mar;8(1):35-46
pubmed: 14644145
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Nov;66(11):1612-8
pubmed: 24664868
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 May;102(5):533-546
pubmed: 29204672
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):87-97
pubmed: 9617910
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 1):569-76
pubmed: 23285597
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Feb 20;8:13
pubmed: 24600387
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Jan;22(1):120-8
pubmed: 12703765
Radiology. 1984 Oct;153(1):189-94
pubmed: 6089263
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jun;25(6):421-8
pubmed: 8792514
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Mar;43(3):601-10
pubmed: 26268693
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):333-342
pubmed: 28482146
Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(4):262-70
pubmed: 7492865
Int J Cardiol. 2002 Sep;85(1):89-99
pubmed: 12163213
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;71(2):173-177
pubmed: 30295435
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;362(12):1151-3
pubmed: 20335599

Auteurs

Andreas Friedberger (A)

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Germany. andreas.friedberger@imp.uni-erlangen.de.

Camille Figueiredo (C)

Department of Medicine 3, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Tobias Bäuerle (T)

Radiological Institute, University Hospital of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Georg Schett (G)

Department of Medicine 3, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Klaus Engelke (K)

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH