Relationship between protein intake and bone architecture or bone mineral density among dynapenic-obese older adults.
Ageing
Bone architecture
Bone density
Dynapenia
Obesity
Protein intake
Journal
Public health nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2727
Titre abrégé: Public Health Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9808463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
23
12
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
22
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current study aimed to assess the relationship between protein intake and bone parameters among dynapenic-obese older adults. The current study is a secondary analysis with an a posteriori and exploratory design. Subjects were recruited from the community via social communication (flyers and meetings in community centres) in the Great Montreal area. Twenty-six subjects were divided a posteriori into two groups according to their usual protein intake: PROT-: < 1 g/kg per d (n 13; women: 53·8 %; 66·5 (sd 3·3) years) and PROT+: > 1·2 g/kg per d (n 13; women: 61·5 %; 67·2 (sd 2·7) years). Both groups were comparable for age (PROT-: 66·5 (sd 3·3) v. PROT+: 67·2 (sd 2·7) years, P = 0·61) and gender (women: PROT-: n 7; 53·8 % v. PROT+: n 8; 61·5 %, P = 0·69). The PROT- group had a higher marrow area (P = 0·049), a greater bone compressive strength (P = 0·048) and a larger total bone area (P = 0·045) than the PROT+ group. However, no significant difference between the two groups was observed regarding body composition (fat and lean masses) or muscle composition. A lower protein intake seems to be associated with bone sizes, which influence bone strength, but do not influence bone density among dynapenic-obese older people.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33349275
pii: S1368980020005224
doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005224
pmc: PMC10195524
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1291-1295Références
Bone. 2015 Jun;75:49-54
pubmed: 25659205
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
Nutr Res. 2017 Mar;39:1-13
pubmed: 28385284
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
pubmed: 12091180
Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov;39(11):3497-3503
pubmed: 32249111
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Nov;46(10):969-74
pubmed: 25167536
J Physiol Anthropol. 2016 Jun 27;36(1):2
pubmed: 27405319
J Clin Invest. 1981 Feb;67(2):328-35
pubmed: 7462421
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2129-34
pubmed: 21054294
Eur J Nutr. 1999 Oct;38(5):235-40
pubmed: 10654160
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(1):8-15
pubmed: 19839175
Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec;37(6 Pt A):2260-2270
pubmed: 29191494
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Jan;19(1):46-50
pubmed: 25466490
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 17;7(12):
pubmed: 30562948
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Aug;14(8):542-59
pubmed: 23867520
J Biomed (Syd). 2018;3:40-49
pubmed: 30505650
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;105(2):513-525
pubmed: 28077378
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60(5):385-90
pubmed: 2369911
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016 Jan;19(1):31-6
pubmed: 26418824