Open healing of contained and non-contained extraction sockets covered with a ribose cross-linked collagen membrane: a pilot study.
Bone regeneration
Epithelial tissue
Guided tissue regeneration
Tooth extraction
Wound healing
Journal
Journal of periodontal & implant science
ISSN: 2093-2278
Titre abrégé: J Periodontal Implant Sci
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101526931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
14
01
2020
revised:
21
07
2020
accepted:
27
08
2020
entrez:
22
12
2020
pubmed:
23
12
2020
medline:
23
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated whether the placement of ribose cross-linked collagen (RCLC) membranes without primary soft tissue closure predictably resulted in sufficient alveolar ridge preservation in contained and non-contained extraction sockets. Membranes were positioned across extraction sockets, undermining full-thickness flaps, and the gingival margins were fixed by double-interrupted sutures without crossed horizontal mattress sutures for 1 week. In non-contained sockets, a bone substitute was used to support the membrane within the bony envelope. Radiographs and clinical images obtained 4 months later were analyzed by ImageJ software using non-parametric tests. In 18 patients, 20 extraction sockets healed uneventfully and all sites received standard-diameter implants (4.1, 4.8, or 5.0 mm) without additional bone augmentation. Soft tissues and the muco-gingival border were well maintained. A retrospective analysis of X-rays and clinical photographs showed non-significant shrinkage in the vertical and horizontal dimensions ( Within the limitations of this pilot study, open healing of RCLC membranes may result in sufficient bone volume for implant placement without additional bone augmentation in contained and non-contained extraction sockets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33350180
pii: 50.406
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2000400020
pmc: PMC7758302
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
406-417Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Korean Academy of Periodontology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflict of interests relevant to this article was reported.
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):806-13
pubmed: 24580835
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Nov 29;18(1):529
pubmed: 29187165
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):e105-e115
pubmed: 25727443
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Dec;47(6):372-380
pubmed: 29333323
J Dent Res. 2018 Mar;97(3):266-274
pubmed: 29073362
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):415-425
pubmed: 28050319
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Feb;47(1):51-63
pubmed: 28261524
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):688-98
pubmed: 20636724
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):73-83
pubmed: 28000281
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23
pubmed: 12956475
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Feb;29(2):202-214
pubmed: 29148597
J Periodontol. 2008 Jun;79(6):1101-7
pubmed: 18533790
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):509-21
pubmed: 25006768
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Aug;21(8):873-6
pubmed: 20666799
J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):377-87
pubmed: 21043792
J Dent Res. 2015 Sep;94(9 Suppl):187S-93S
pubmed: 26130259
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42(4):390-7
pubmed: 25735565
J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8
pubmed: 24966231
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jul;27(7):884-9
pubmed: 26566965
J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):195S-201S
pubmed: 24158340
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):849-54
pubmed: 27447152
J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1616-23
pubmed: 11759875