Iatrogenic allergic contact dermatitis in the (peri)anal and genital area.


Journal

Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
revised: 06 12 2020
received: 30 10 2020
accepted: 10 12 2020
pubmed: 23 12 2020
medline: 5 11 2021
entrez: 22 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from topical medication often occurs in occluded areas, for example, with wound treatment, but also in certain body locations, such as the anogenital area. To investigate the demographics and specific lesion location of patients with ACD from topical drugs applied onto the (peri)anal/genital area, and to identify the respective causal topical pharmaceutical products and ingredients involved. From January 2000 to December 10, 2018, 532 patients were tested with the baseline series, sometimes with additional series, and the topical medication used along with the ingredients. The relevant data were extracted from our electronic databases developed in-house. Forty-four patients (9%) out of 473 patients suffering from lesions in the (peri)anal/genital area had positive patch test results to topical drug preparations and/or their ingredients, sometimes in association with cosmetics for intimate hygiene. The most frequent sensitizing active principles were local anaesthetics and corticosteroids, while wool alcohols and to a minor extent benzoic acid were the most frequent culprits among the vehicle components and preservative agents, respectively. The local conditions (eg, occlusion, sweating, moist) in the anogenital area may favour skin sensitization to topical medication used to treat various skin diseases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from topical medication often occurs in occluded areas, for example, with wound treatment, but also in certain body locations, such as the anogenital area.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To investigate the demographics and specific lesion location of patients with ACD from topical drugs applied onto the (peri)anal/genital area, and to identify the respective causal topical pharmaceutical products and ingredients involved.
METHODS METHODS
From January 2000 to December 10, 2018, 532 patients were tested with the baseline series, sometimes with additional series, and the topical medication used along with the ingredients. The relevant data were extracted from our electronic databases developed in-house.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-four patients (9%) out of 473 patients suffering from lesions in the (peri)anal/genital area had positive patch test results to topical drug preparations and/or their ingredients, sometimes in association with cosmetics for intimate hygiene. The most frequent sensitizing active principles were local anaesthetics and corticosteroids, while wool alcohols and to a minor extent benzoic acid were the most frequent culprits among the vehicle components and preservative agents, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The local conditions (eg, occlusion, sweating, moist) in the anogenital area may favour skin sensitization to topical medication used to treat various skin diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33350482
doi: 10.1111/cod.13764
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenal Cortex Hormones 0
Anesthetics, Local 0
Cosmetics 0
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical 0
Lanolin 8006-54-0
Benzoic Acid 8SKN0B0MIM

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

431-438

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Gilissen L, Goossens A. Frequency and trends of contact allergy to and iatrogenic contact dermatitis caused by topical drugs over a 25-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75(5):290-302.
Goossens A, Gonçalo M. Contact allergy to topical drugs. In: Johansen JD, Mahler V, Lepoittevin J-P, Frosch PJ, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_38-2
Bauer A, Oehme S, Geier J. Contact sensitization in the anal and genital area. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;40(1):133-141.
Schlosser BJ. Contact dermatitis of the vulva. Dermatol Clin. 2010;28(4):697-706.
Bauer A, Rödiger C, Greif C, Kaatz M, Elsner P. Vulvar dermatoses - irritant and allergic contact dermatitis of the vulva. Dermatology. 2005;210(2):143-149.
Warshaw EM, Furda LM, Maibach HI, et al. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the north American contact dermatitis group, 1994-2004. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(6):749-755.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195-221.
Goossens A, Drieghe J. Computer applications in contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38(1):51-52.
Warshaw EM, Kimyon RS, Sivernerg IJ, et al. Evaluation of patch test findings in patients with anogenital dermatitis. JAMA. 2020;156(1):85-91.
Baeck M, Goossens A. Immediate and delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: practical guidelines. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(1):38-45.
Brinca A, Cabral R, Gonçalo M. Contact allergy to local anaesthetics-value of patch testing with a caine mix in the baseline series. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68(3):156-162.
Lodi A, Ambonati M, Coassini A, Kouhdari Z, Palvarini M, Crosti C. Contact allergy to ‘caines’ caused by anti-hemorrhoidal ointments. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41(4):221-222.
Thyssen JP, Engkilde K, Menné T, Johansen JD. Prevalence of benzocaine and lidocaine patch test sensitivity in Denmark: temporal trends and relevance. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(2):76-80.
To D, Kossintseva I, De Gannes G. Lidocaine contact allergy is becoming more prevalent. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(12):1367-1372.
Opstrup MS, Johansen JD, Zachariae C, Garvey LH. Contact allergy to chlorhexidine in a tertiary dermatology clinic in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(1):29-36.
Borrego L, Hernández N, Hernández Z, Peñate Y. Povidone-iodine induced post-surgical irritant contact dermatitis localized outside of the surgical incision area. Report of 27 cases and a literature review. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55(5):540-545.
Chiriac A, Chiriac AE, Pinteala T, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from topical acyclovir: case series. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(2):37-39.
Nino M, Balato N, Di Costanzo L, Gaudiello F. Scratch-patch test for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis to aciclovir. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(1):56-57.
Fan S, Liu X, Wu C, Xu L, Li J. Vaginal Nystatin versus Oral fluconazole for the treatment for recurrent Vulvovaginal candidiasis. Mycopathologia. 2015;179(1-2):95-101.
Woodruff CM, Trivedi MK, Botto N, Kornik R. Allergic contact dermatitis of the vulva. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;29(5):233-243.
Leroy A, Baeck M, Tennstedt D. Contact dermatitis and secondary systemic allergy to dimethindene maleate. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(3):170-171.
Uter W, Schnuch A. EMA revokes marketing authorization for bufexamac. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(4):235-236.
Pan Y, Nixon R. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical preparations of bufexamac. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(3):207-210.
Wong GN, Shen S, Nixon R. Severe allergic contact dermatitis caused by topical bufexamac requiring hospitalization. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(6):395-397.
Ayhan A, Guven S, Guvendag Guven ES, Sakinci M, Gultekin M, Kucukali T. Topical testosterone versus clobetasol for vulvar lichen sclerosus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96(2):117-121.
Nguyen HL, Yiannias JA. Contact dermatitis to medications and skin products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56(1):41-59.
Reider N, Komericki P, Hausen BM, Fritsch P, Aberer W. The seamy side of natural medicines: contact sensitization to arnica (Arnica montana L.) and marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(5):269-272.
Gilissen L, Huygens S, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by topical herbal remedies: importance of patch testing with the patients' own products. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78(3):177-184.
Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis from the vehicle components of topical pharmaceutical products. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34(3):663-670.

Auteurs

Liesbeth Gilissen (L)

Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Isabelle Schollaert (I)

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sara Huygens (S)

Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

An Goossens (A)

Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH