Extended diffusion theory: Recovering dynamics from biased/accelerated molecular simulations.
Journal
Journal of computational chemistry
ISSN: 1096-987X
Titre abrégé: J Comput Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9878362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 04 2021
05 04 2021
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
revised:
09
11
2020
accepted:
02
12
2020
pubmed:
23
12
2020
medline:
23
12
2020
entrez:
22
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dynamical properties are of great importance in determining the behavior of synthetic and natural molecules, but capturing them by computational methods is a nontrivial task. Very often the time scales of the relevant phenomena are far beyond the typical time windows accessible by classical Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, currently limited to the order of microseconds on standard laboratory workstations. On the other hand, biased and accelerated simulations allow for fast and thorough exploration of the molecular conformational space, but they lose the dynamic information. The problem of recovering dynamics from biased/accelerated simulations is a very active field of research, but no totally robust/reliable solutions have been given yet. In this paper it is shown how the Smoluchowski equation, in the framework of Diffusion Theory (DT), can be used to bridge this gap, and dynamical properties, in the form of time correlation functions (TCFs), can be extracted also from such kind of simulations. DT is first extended (EDT) to express the mobility tensors entering the Smoluchowski operator in terms of a recently introduced unified and regularized Rotne-Prager-Yamakawa approximation, [P. J. Zuk, E. Wajnryb, K. A. Mizerski, P. Szymczak, J. Fluid. Mech. 2014, 741, R5, 1-13] also involving mixed rotation-translation contributions, and rotation-rotation terms beside the classical translation-translation ones, so far used in DT. Then, the method is applied to recover the dynamics of a nontrivial example of a peptide in explicit water from the first 200 ns of a Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics simulation, which is a popular computational method that destroys the long time dynamics. EDT dynamics were found to favorably compare against those coming from a standard MD simulation of the same system, requiring a time window of 30 μs to converge. This result shows that EDT is a tool of practical value to recover the long time dynamics of systems in diffusive regimes from biased/accelerated simulations, to be exploited in those cases when direct evaluation by standard MD is unfeasible.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
586-599Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
A. F. Voter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 3908.
M. R. Sørensen, A. F. Voter, J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 9599.
L. Maragliano, E. Vanden-Eijnden, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 426, 168.
Y. Hu, W. Hong, Y. Shi, H. Liu, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3777.
Y. Sugita, Y. Okamoto, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314, 141.
B. A. Berg, T. Neuhaus, Phys. Lett. B 1991, 267, 249.
J. S. Wang, Phys. A 2000, 281, 147.
A. Laio, M. Parrinello, PNAS 2002, 99, 12562.
A. Barducci, G. Bussi, M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 020603.
A. E. Garcìa, K. Y. Sanbonmatsu, PNAS 2002, 99, 2782.
P. H. Nguyen, G. Stock, E. Mittag, C.-K. Hu, M. S. Li, Proteins Struct. Func. Bioinf. 2005, 61, 795.
C. Bergonzo, N. M. Henriksen, D. R. Roe, J. M. Swails, A. E. Roitberg, T. E. Cheatham, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 492.
R. Qi, G. Wei, B. Ma, R. Nussinov, Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1777, 101.
M. A. Deriu, G. Grasso, J. A. Tuszynski, D. Massai, D. Gallo, U. Morbiducci, A. Danani, Proteins Struct. Func. Bioinf. 2016, 84, 666.
G. Grasso, J. A. Tuzynski, U. Morbiducci, G. Licandro, A. Danani, M. A. Deriu, Bio. Direct 2017, 12, 2.
G. Grasso, M. A. Deriu, V. Patrulea, G. Borchard, M. Möller, A. Danani, PLoS One 2017, 12, e0186816.
G. Grasso, M. Rebella, S. Muscat, U. Morbiducci, J. Tuszynski, A. Danani, M. Deriu, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 571.
N.-V. Buchete, G. Hummer, Phys. Rev. E 2008, 77, 030902(R).
J.-H. Prinz, J. D. Chodera, V. S. Pande, W. C. Swope, J. C. Smith, F. Noé, J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 244108.
A. Chattopadhyay, M. Zheng, M. P. Waller, U. D. Priyakumar, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 3365.
L. S. Stelzl, G. Hummer, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 3927.
J. D. Chodera, W. C. Swope, F. Noé, J.-H. Prinz, M. R. Shirts, V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 244107.
P. Tiwary, M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 230602.
W. H. Paul, C. Wehmeyer, F. Noé, PNAS 2016, 113, E3221.
I. Teo, C. G. Mayne, K. Schulten, T. Lelievre, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2983.
X. Y. Chang, K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 8016.
A. Perico, R. Pratolongo, K. F. Freed, R. W. Pastor, A. Szabo, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 564.
A. Perico, R. Pratolongo, Macromolecules 1997, 30, 5958.
W. H. Tang, X. Y. Chang, K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 9492.
K. S. Kostov, K. F. Freed, Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 149.
G. La Penna, P. Carbone, R. Carpentiero, A. Rapallo, A. Perico, J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 1876.
R. Gaspari, A. Rapallo, J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 244109.
P. J. Hsu, S. K. Lai, A. Rapallo, J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 104910.
B. Cichocki, B. U. Felderhof, K. Hinsen, E. Wajnryb, J. Bławzdziewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 3780.
B. Cichocki, M. L. Ekiel-Jeżewska, E. Wajnryb, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 3265.
M. L. Ekiel-Jeżewska, E. Wajnryb, in Theoretical Methods for Micro Scale Viscous Flows (Eds: F. Feuillebois, A. Sellier), Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum 2009, p. 127.
C. W. Oseen, Mathematik und ihre Anwendungen in Monographien und Lehrbüchern, Band I, E. Hilb Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig 1927, p. 105.
J. Rotne, S. Prager, J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 50, 4831.
H. Yamakawa, J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 436.
E. Wajnryb, K. A. Mizerski, P. J. Zuk, P. Szymczak, J. Fluid Mech. 2013, 731, R3.
P. J. Zuk, E. Wajnryb, K. A. Mizerski, P. Szymczak, J. Fluid Mech. 2014, 741, R5.
G. La Penna, A. Mitsutake, M. Masuya, Y. Okamoto, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 380, 609.
K. S. Kostov, K. F. Freed, E. B. Webb III., M. Mondello, G. S. Grest, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 9155.
M.-y. Shen, K. F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 5143.
S. Fausti, G. La Penna, C. Cuniberti, A. Perico, Biopolymers 1999, 50, 613.
G. La Penna, A. Perico, D. Genest, J. Biomol. Struct. & Dynamics 2000, 17, 673.
G. La Penna, S. Fausti, A. Perico, J. A. Ferretti, Biopolymers 2000, 54, 89.
C. P. Jaroniec, C. E. MacPhee, N. S. Astrof, C. M. Dobson, R. G. Griffin, PNAS 2002, 99, 16748.
R. B. Jones, Phys. A 1988, 150, 339.
R. B. Jones, P. N. Pusey, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1991, 42, 137.
B. U. Felderhof, R. B. Jones, Phys. Rev. E 1993, 48, 1084.
V. Degiorgio, R. Piazza, Phys. Rev. E 1995, 52, 2707.
M. A. Gonzáles, J. L. F. Abscal, J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 224516.
G. Bussi, D. Donadio, M. Parrinello, J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 014101.
E. Lindhal, B. Hess, D. Van Der Spoel, Mol. Model. Ann. 2001, 7, 306.
D. Van Der Spoel, E. Lindhal, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1701.
W. L. Jorgensen, J. Tirado-Rives, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657.
A. Kone, D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 206101.
D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 6911.
D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 10852.
D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 1167.
A. Patriksson, D. Van der Spoel, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 2073.
H. G. Katzgraber, S. Trebst, D. A. Huse, M. Troyer, J. Stat. Mech. 2006, P03018, 1.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999, p. 617.
M. Lingenheil, R. Denschlag, R. Reichold, P. Tavan, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 1293.
J. Wong-ekkabut, M. Karttunen, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2016, 1858, 2529.
R. W. Pastor, M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 2636.