Multi-year pair-bonding in Murray cod (
Maccullochella
Mating strategy
Monogamy
Murray cod
Pair-bond
snp
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2018
accepted:
10
11
2020
entrez:
23
12
2020
pubmed:
24
12
2020
medline:
24
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mating strategies in fishes are known to include polygyny, polyandry and monogamy and provide valuable insights regarding powerful evolutionary forces such as sexual selection. Monogamy is a complex of mating systems that has been relatively neglected. Previous work on mating strategies in fishes has often been based on observation and focused on marine species rather than freshwater fishes. SNPs are increasingly being used as a molecular ecology tool in non-model organisms, and methods of probabilistic genetic analysis of such datasets are becoming available for use in the absence of parental genotypes. This approach can be used to infer mating strategies. The long-term pair bonding seen in mammals, reptiles and birds has not been recorded in freshwater fishes-in every other respect an extremely diverse group. This study shows that multi-year pair bonding occurs in an Australian Percichthyid fish that exhibits paternal care of eggs and larvae. Using SNPs, full sibling pairs of larvae were found over multiple years in a three-year study. Stable isotope signatures of the larvae support the genetic inference that full sibling pairs shared a common mother, the ultimate source of that isotopic signature during oogenesis. Spatial and temporal clustering also suggests that the full sibling larvae are unlikely to be false positive identifications of the probabilistic identification of siblings. For the first time, we show multi-year pair bonding in a wild freshwater fish. This will have important conservation and management implications for the species. This approach could provide insights into many behavioural, ecological and evolutionary questions, particularly if this is not a unique case. Our findings are likely to initiate interest in seeking more examples of monogamy and alternative mating strategies in freshwater fishes, particularly if others improve methods of analysis of SNP data for identification of siblings in the absence of parental genotypes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33354425
doi: 10.7717/peerj.10460
pii: 10460
pmc: PMC7733648
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.5383606.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e10460Informations de copyright
©2020 Couch et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Références
Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):432-40
pubmed: 7739385
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 27;4:e2593
pubmed: 27812407
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 May;15(3):557-61
pubmed: 25186958
J Fish Biol. 2016 Apr;88(4):1350-68
pubmed: 26919062
Genome Biol. 2005;6(12):R105
pubmed: 16356268
Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1079-1086
pubmed: 10877885
BMC Genet. 2010 Oct 15;11:94
pubmed: 20950446
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Feb;5(2):39-43
pubmed: 21232318
Front Genet. 2014 Dec 12;5:432
pubmed: 25566319
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 09;9(7):e101673
pubmed: 25006804
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Jan;18(1):107-117
pubmed: 28921927
PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64062
pubmed: 23724020
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15167-8
pubmed: 24046334
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 05;8(11):e78037
pubmed: 24223758
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Sep;17(5):1009-1024
pubmed: 28271620
Hydrobiologia. 2012 Feb 1;682(1):
pubmed: 24293682
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 May;79(2):351-75
pubmed: 15191228
Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):900-4
pubmed: 18988842
Mol Ecol. 2005 Feb;14(2):653-60
pubmed: 15660954
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jul;13(7):1965-74
pubmed: 15189217
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;888:67-89
pubmed: 22665276
Biol Lett. 2012 Jun 23;8(3):355-7
pubmed: 22114323
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2431-7
pubmed: 11133034
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;395:615-27
pubmed: 8714026
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2959-63
pubmed: 17878140