Minimal Damage to the Supinator Muscle After the Double-Incision Technique for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.
distal biceps tendon repair
double-incision technique
fat fraction
supination strength
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
13
05
2020
accepted:
03
06
2020
entrez:
23
12
2020
pubmed:
24
12
2020
medline:
24
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The effect of the double-incision technique on the supinator muscle is unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify fatty atrophy of the supinator muscle and map the area of muscle damage. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 19 male patients (median age, 43 years) who underwent distal biceps tendon repair were included in the analysis. Patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. The following variables were analyzed: range of motion; shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score; Summary Outcome Determination (SOD) score; and isokinetic peak force and endurance in supination. Quantitative analysis and mapping of fatty infiltration of the supinator muscle were based on the calculation of proton density fat fraction on magnetic resonance imaging scans of both elbows using the IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Echoes of Asymmetrical Length) sequence. At an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-64 months), the median SOD score was 9.0 (95% CI, 7.8-9.4), and the mean QuickDASH score was 6.7 (95% CI, 0.0-14.1). A difference of 17% in peak torque was measured between repaired and nonrepaired elbows (repaired elbow: 9.7 N·m; nonrepaired elbow: 11.7 N·m; The assessment of the supinator muscle showed a limited increase in fat fraction between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity. No significant effect on supination strength was highlighted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The effect of the double-incision technique on the supinator muscle is unclear.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to quantify fatty atrophy of the supinator muscle and map the area of muscle damage.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 19 male patients (median age, 43 years) who underwent distal biceps tendon repair were included in the analysis. Patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. The following variables were analyzed: range of motion; shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score; Summary Outcome Determination (SOD) score; and isokinetic peak force and endurance in supination. Quantitative analysis and mapping of fatty infiltration of the supinator muscle were based on the calculation of proton density fat fraction on magnetic resonance imaging scans of both elbows using the IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Echoes of Asymmetrical Length) sequence.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-64 months), the median SOD score was 9.0 (95% CI, 7.8-9.4), and the mean QuickDASH score was 6.7 (95% CI, 0.0-14.1). A difference of 17% in peak torque was measured between repaired and nonrepaired elbows (repaired elbow: 9.7 N·m; nonrepaired elbow: 11.7 N·m;
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The assessment of the supinator muscle showed a limited increase in fat fraction between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity. No significant effect on supination strength was highlighted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33354582
doi: 10.1177/2325967120967776
pii: 10.1177_2325967120967776
pmc: PMC7734523
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967120967776Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: D.B. is a teaching consultant for Orthofix and Zimmer Biomet. F.C. is a teaching consultant for Zimmer Biomet. R.R. is a teaching consultant for Mitek, DePuy, Lima, Zimmer Biomet, Medacta, and Smith & Nephew. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Apr;77(4):1516-1524
pubmed: 27080068
Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7
pubmed: 7564793
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2509-15
pubmed: 20847224
Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):767-75
pubmed: 23382293
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46
pubmed: 15866967
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2012 Nov 28;2(4):e22
pubmed: 31321142
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jan;21(1):29-35
pubmed: 21983191
Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;21(1):114-9
pubmed: 8427351
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):785-796
pubmed: 28463923
Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):51
pubmed: 30541635
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1442-51
pubmed: 25819731
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 16;97(24):2014-23
pubmed: 26677235
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 May;28(3):496-502
pubmed: 12772111
Clin Sports Med. 2010 Oct;29(4):555-76
pubmed: 20883897
Hepatology. 2015 Nov;62(5):1444-55
pubmed: 26224591
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 20;98(14):1153-60
pubmed: 27440562
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Mar;67(3):418-21
pubmed: 3972866
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):53-7
pubmed: 19574061
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2017 Nov 08;7(4):e32
pubmed: 30233967
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Oct;28(10):1936-1941
pubmed: 31371160
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):130-5
pubmed: 18957526
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2214-21
pubmed: 19622792
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 May;39(5):1178-85
pubmed: 24115490
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1623-31
pubmed: 22694881
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1898-1904
pubmed: 25219473
J Hand Microsurg. 2019 Aug;11(2):88-93
pubmed: 31413492
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;11(6):962-970
pubmed: 27904798
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1575-81
pubmed: 11097447
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jul;21(7):935-41
pubmed: 21813297
Injury. 2008 Jul;39(7):753-60
pubmed: 18541242
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):252-8
pubmed: 17192318