Outcome and EBRA migration analysis of a reconstruction cage in acetabular revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study.


Journal

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 18 09 2020
accepted: 06 12 2020
pubmed: 24 12 2020
medline: 17 6 2021
entrez: 23 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Restoration cages and bone allografts have been proposed to manage severe acetabular bone defects. We aimed to investigate the migration behaviour of a restoration cup and impacted allograft bone in severe acetabular defects with Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA). Applying a retrospective study design, 64 cases treated between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed. We determined the preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pre- to postoperative WOMAC score, blood loss and functional outcome. From preoperative x rays, the acetabular deficiencies were classified according to Paprosky. Cup migration analyses were performed with EBRA. Mean age at surgery was 73 (range: 38-93) years. According to the classification by Paprosky et al., 50% (n = 32) of our patients showed a type III B and 28.1% (n = 18) a type III A defect. Radiological follow-up for migration analysis was 35 (range: 4-95) months. Migration analysis showed a mean cup migration of 0.7 mm (range: 5.7-9.6) medial and 1.8 mm (range: 1.7-12.6) cranial. In conclusion, acetabular restoration cages in combination with bone impaction grafting showed a low revision rate at a mean follow-up of 35 months. Mean cup migration revealed low rates after 2 years and suggested a stable postoperative implant position.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33354743
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03722-x
pii: 10.1007/s00402-020-03722-x
pmc: PMC7900083
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

509-516

Références

Makela KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V (2008) Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2160–2170. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00870
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870 pubmed: 18829914
Lee JM, Kim TH (2018) Acetabular cup revision arthroplasty using morselized impaction allograft. Hip Pelvis 30:65–77. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.65
doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.65 pubmed: 29896455 pmcid: 5990533
Buttaro MA, de la Rosa DM, Comba F, Piccaluga F (2012) High failure rate with the GAP II ring and impacted allograft bone in severe acetabular defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3148–3155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2402-8
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2402-8 pubmed: 22644424 pmcid: 3462861
Morales De Cano JJ, Guillamet L, Perez Pons A (2019) Acetabular reconstruction in paprosky type Iii defects. Acta Ortop Bras 27:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192701187313
doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192701187313 pubmed: 30774533
Hosny HAH, El-Bakoury A, Fekry H, Keenan J (2018) Mid-term results of graft augmentation prosthesis II cage and impacted allograft bone in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:1487–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.060
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.060 pubmed: 29310917
Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Paprosky WG (2013) Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:128–139. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-03-128
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-03-128 pubmed: 23457063
Ballester Alfaro JJ, Sueiro Fernandez J (2010) Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the Trabecular Metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int 20(Suppl 7):S119–127. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2010.5297
doi: 10.5301/HIP.2010.5297 pubmed: 20512783
Ibrahim MS, Raja S, Haddad FS (2013) Acetabular impaction bone grafting in total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 95:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b11.32834
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b11.32834 pubmed: 24187364
Gross AE, Goodman S (2004) The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000149822.49890.5e
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149822.49890.5e pubmed: 15577487
Duffy GP, O’Connor MI, Brodersen MP (2007) Fatigue failure of the GAP ring. J Arthroplasty 22:711–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.108
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.108 pubmed: 17689781
Nunag P, Deakin AH, Oburu E, Sarungi M (2012) Two-year radiologic assessment of the trident peripheral self-locking cup using EBRA. Hip Int 22:511–515. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2012.9744
doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9744 pubmed: 23100151
Stihsen C, Rath C, Radl R, Saalabian AA, Materna W, Rehak P, Windhager R (2013) Early migration characteristics of a 180 degrees porous-coated cup with 1-mm press fit. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1713-x
doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1713-x pubmed: 23475053
Malak TT, Broomfield JA, Palmer AJ, Hopewell S, Carr A, Brown C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Glyn-Jones S (2016) Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res 5:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.56.2000568
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.2000568 pubmed: 27267795 pmcid: 4921042
Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x
doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x pubmed: 8163974
Rachbauer F (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Orthopade 34:1103–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-005-0854-1
doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0854-1 pubmed: 16133154
Meermans G, Konan S, Das R, Volpin A, Haddad FS (2017) The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 99:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.38053
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.38053 pubmed: 28566391
Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 95:47–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379169
doi: 10.1007/bf00379169 pubmed: 526126
Moretti VM, Post ZD (2017) Surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 51:368–376. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_317_16
doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_317_16 pubmed: 28790465 pmcid: 5525517
Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ (2015) Anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 30:419–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.020
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.020 pubmed: 25453632
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW (1986) A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin Rheumatol 5:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02032362
doi: 10.1007/bf02032362 pubmed: 3731718
Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik J, Mayrhofer P (1995) EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 28:1225–1236
doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00177-6
Krismer M, Stockl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Mayrhofer P, Ogon M (1996) Early migration predicts late aseptic failure of hip sockets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:422–426
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B3.0780422
Sembrano JN, Cheng EY (2008) Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x pubmed: 18299946 pmcid: 2505268
Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J (1996) Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013 pubmed: 8595745
Krismer M, Tschupik JP, Bauer R, Mayrhofer P, Stockl B, Fischer M, Biedermann R (1997) Single-image roentgen analysis for the measurement of hip endoprosthesis migration. Orthopade 26:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001320050089
doi: 10.1007/s001320050089 pubmed: 9198796
Meunier A, Petersson A, Good L, Berlin G (2008) Validation of a haemoglobin dilution method for estimation of blood loss. Vox Sang 95:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01071.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01071.x pubmed: 18510580
Jain S, Grogan RJ, Giannoudis PV (2014) Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review. Hip Int 24:109–122. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000101
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000101 pubmed: 24186672
Kim YH (2017) Acetabular cup revision. Hip Pelvis 29:155–158. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.155
doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.155 pubmed: 28955680 pmcid: 5612974
Nunn D, Freeman MA, Hill PF, Evans SJ (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:629–631
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2768311
Ilchmann T, Franzen H, Mjoberg B, Wingstrand H (1992) Measurement accuracy in acetabular cup migration. A comparison of four radiologic methods versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 7:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(92)90004-a
doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90004-a pubmed: 1613517
Sutherland CJ, Bresina SJ (1992) Measurement of acetabular component migration using two-dimensional radiography. J Arthroplasty 7(Suppl):377–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80027-1
doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80027-1 pubmed: 1431919
Phillips NJ, Stockley I, Wilkinson JM (2002) Direct plain radiographic methods versus EBRA-Digital for measuring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:917–925. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.34529
doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.34529 pubmed: 12375253
Selvik G (1990) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiol 31:113–126
doi: 10.1177/028418519003100201
Abrahams JM, Callary SA, Jang SW, Hewitt J, Howie DW, Solomon LB (2020) Accuracy of EBRA-cup measurements after reconstruction of severe acetabular defects at revision THR. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24623
doi: 10.1002/jor.24623 pubmed: 32039492
Makinen TJ, Fichman SG, Watts E, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) The role of cages in the management of severe acetabular bone defects at revision arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b1.36307
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b1.36307 pubmed: 26733646
Paprosky WG, Sporer SS, Murphy BP (2007) Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do. J Arthroplasty 22:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.018
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.018 pubmed: 17570291
Deirmengian GK, Zmistowski B, O’Neil JT, Hozack WJ (2011) Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1842–1852. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01197
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01197 pubmed: 22005871

Auteurs

Dietmar Dammerer (D)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Philipp Blum (P)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. philippblum1@gmx.de.

David Putzer (D)

Department of Experimental Orthopedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 36, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Annelies van Beeck (A)

Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.

Michael Nogler (M)

Department of Experimental Orthopedics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 36, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Martin Thaler (M)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH