Efficacy of Pazopanib With or Without Gemcitabine in Patients With Anthracycline- and/or Ifosfamide-Refractory Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Final Results of the PAPAGEMO Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 24 12 2020
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 23 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pazopanib and gemcitabine have shown good tolerability, albeit modest single-agent activity in pretreated soft tissue sarcoma. A combined regimen to improve outcomes is required. To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and pazopanib compared with pazopanib alone. This multicenter, randomized phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in Germany from September 2011 to July 2014 and included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 2, adequate organ function, measurable lesion, and progression after at least 1 prior treatment with anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide. Data analysis was performed during 2019 and 2020. Patients were randomized to pazopanib with gemcitabine (A) or without gemcitabine (B). The primary end point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 12 weeks; secondary end points included toxicity, quality of life, overall survival, and response rates. A total of 90 patients were randomized, and 86 eligible patients (43 women [50%]) were evaluable, with a median age of 57 (range, 22-84) years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0/1 in 77 participants (90%). The predominant histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (22 [26%]) and liposarcoma (16 [19%]). After a median follow-up of 12.4 (range, 1-48) months, the primary end point was met, with a PFSR at 12 weeks of 74% (A) vs 47% (B) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 90% CI, 1.15-2.23; P = .01). In the combination arm, PFSR was significantly longer, with a median of 5.6 vs 2.0 months (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02) compared with single-agent pazopanib, whereas overall survival was similar, with 13.1 vs 11.2 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60-1.58; P = .83). The objective response rate was overall low, with 11% (A) vs 5% (B) (P = .10). The toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and gemcitabine was increased, but it was manageable and mainly hematological. This phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with soft tissue sarcoma found that the addition of gemcitabine to pazopanib was tolerable, and PFSR at 12 weeks was significantly higher compared with pazopanib alone. These results suggest clinical activity of the combination, but they should be confirmed in a phase 3 trial in a more homogeneous population (eg, leiomyosarcoma). German Clinical Trials Identifier: DRKS00003139.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33355646
pii: 2774308
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6564
pmc: PMC7758834
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anthracyclines 0
Indazoles 0
Pyrimidines 0
Sulfonamides 0
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
pazopanib 7RN5DR86CK
Ifosfamide UM20QQM95Y
Gemcitabine 0

Banques de données

DRKS
['DRKS00003139']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

255-262

Auteurs

Hans-Joachim Schmoll (HJ)

Clinic for Internal Medicine IV-Hematology/Oncology, University Clinic, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Lars H Lindner (LH)

Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

Peter Reichardt (P)

HELIOS Clinic Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.

Klaus Heißner (K)

Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.

Hans-Georg Kopp (HG)

University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Torsten Kessler (T)

University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Regine Mayer-Steinacker (R)

University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Jörn Rüssel (J)

Clinic for Internal Medicine IV-Hematology/Oncology, University Clinic, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Gerlinde Egerer (G)

Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martina Crysandt (M)

Department of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Bernd Kasper (B)

Interdisciplinary Tumor Center Mannheim, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany.

Dietger Niederwieser (D)

University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Annegret Kunitz (A)

University Hospital Charité Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.

Ekkehard Eigendorff (E)

University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.

Iver Petersen (I)

University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
SRH Wald Klinikum, Gera, Germany.

Jörg Steighardt (J)

Coordination Center for Clinical Trials Halle, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Franziska Cygon (F)

Clinic for Internal Medicine IV-Hematology/Oncology, University Clinic, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Fabian Meinert (F)

Clinic for Internal Medicine IV-Hematology/Oncology, University Clinic, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Alexander Stein (A)

University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH