Effect of combined home-based, overground robotic-assisted gait training and usual physiotherapy on clinical functional outcomes in people with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
Stroke
home-based
rehabilitation
robotics
Journal
Clinical rehabilitation
ISSN: 1477-0873
Titre abrégé: Clin Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8802181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
17
7
2021
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the effect of a home-based over-ground robotic-assisted gait training program using the AlterG Bionic Leg orthosis on clinical functional outcomes in people with chronic stroke. Randomized controlled trial. Home. Thirty-four ambulatory chronic stroke patients who recieve usual physiotherapy. Usual physiotherapy plus either (1)10-week over-ground robotic-assisted gait training program ( The primary outcome was the Six-Minute Walk Test. Secondary outcomes included: Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Ambulation Categories, Dynamic Gait Index and Berg Balance Scale. Physical activity and sedentary time were assessed using accelerometry. All measurements were completed at baseline, 10 and 22 weeks after baseline. Significant increases in walking distance were observed for the Six-Minute Walk Test between baseline and 10 weeks for over-ground robotic-assisted gait training (135 ± 81 m vs 158 ± 93 m, respectively; Over-ground robotic-assisted gait training combined with physiotherapy in chronic stroke patients led to significant improvements in clinical functional outcomes and physical activity compared to the control group. Improvements were maintained at 22 weeks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33356519
doi: 10.1177/0269215520984133
pmc: PMC8191155
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
882-893Références
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Sep 10;7:43
pubmed: 20828422
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Mar;36(1):113-20
pubmed: 22082495
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Feb 6;2018:4085298
pubmed: 29546057
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 26;364(21):2026-36
pubmed: 21612471
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1686-92
pubmed: 18760152
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1641-7
pubmed: 16084820
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):75-82
pubmed: 15788341
Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(1):29-38
pubmed: 11552860
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;24(11):2539-46
pubmed: 26303787
Stroke. 2007 Mar;38(3):1091-6
pubmed: 17272767
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov;93(11):987-94
pubmed: 24901757
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11
pubmed: 21772732
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1920-1924
pubmed: 29200624
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Dec;62(605):664-6
pubmed: 23211256
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):29-35
pubmed: 26512928
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
J Med Case Rep. 2012 Jul 23;6:216
pubmed: 22823961
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1410-5
pubmed: 17964880
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):710-721
pubmed: 30723189
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9
pubmed: 17908575
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):372-380
pubmed: 29097056