The Financial Impact on Reimbursement of Moderately Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: An International Consortium Report.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 21 08 2020
revised: 06 11 2020
accepted: 08 12 2020
pubmed: 29 12 2020
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 28 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation has been evaluated in several prospective studies, resulting in wide acceptance of shorter treatment protocols for postoperative breast irradiation. Reimbursement for radiation therapy varies between private and public systems and between countries, impacting variably financial considerations in the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation by reimbursement system in different countries. The study was designed by an international group of radiation oncologists. A web-questionnaire was distributed to representatives from each country. The participants were asked to involve the financial consultant at their institution. Data from 13 countries from all populated continents were collected (Europe: Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK; North America: Canada, USA; South America: Brazil; Africa: South Africa; Oceania: Australia; Asia: Israel, Taiwan). Clinicians and/or departments in most of the countries surveyed (77%) receive remuneration based on the number of fractions delivered to the patient. The financial loss per patient estimated resulting from applying moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation instead of conventional fractionation ranged from 5-10% to 30-40%, depending on the healthcare provider. Although a generalised adoption of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation would allow for a considerable reduction in social and economic burden, the financial loss for the healthcare providers induced by fee-for-service remuneration may be a factor in the slow uptake of these regimens. Therefore, fee-for-service reimbursement may not be preferable for radiation oncology. We propose that an alternative system of remuneration, such as bundled payments based on stage and diagnosis, may provide more value for all stakeholders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33358283
pii: S0936-6555(20)30484-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

322-330

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR300024
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

G N Marta (GN)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: gustavonmarta@gmail.com.

D Ramiah (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.

O Kaidar-Person (O)

Breast Cancer Radiation Unit, Radiation Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

A Kirby (A)

Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

C Coles (C)

Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

R Jagsi (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

T Hijal (T)

Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

G Sancho (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Y Zissiadis (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Genesis Cancer Care, Wembley, WA, Australia.

J-P Pignol (JP)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

A Y Ho (AY)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

S H-C Cheng (SH)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

B V Offersen (BV)

Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

I Meattini (I)

Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

P Poortmans (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH