The Financial Impact on Reimbursement of Moderately Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: An International Consortium Report.
Breast cancer
health economics
hypofractionation
radiation therapy
reimbursement
Journal
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
21
08
2020
revised:
06
11
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation has been evaluated in several prospective studies, resulting in wide acceptance of shorter treatment protocols for postoperative breast irradiation. Reimbursement for radiation therapy varies between private and public systems and between countries, impacting variably financial considerations in the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation by reimbursement system in different countries. The study was designed by an international group of radiation oncologists. A web-questionnaire was distributed to representatives from each country. The participants were asked to involve the financial consultant at their institution. Data from 13 countries from all populated continents were collected (Europe: Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK; North America: Canada, USA; South America: Brazil; Africa: South Africa; Oceania: Australia; Asia: Israel, Taiwan). Clinicians and/or departments in most of the countries surveyed (77%) receive remuneration based on the number of fractions delivered to the patient. The financial loss per patient estimated resulting from applying moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation instead of conventional fractionation ranged from 5-10% to 30-40%, depending on the healthcare provider. Although a generalised adoption of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation would allow for a considerable reduction in social and economic burden, the financial loss for the healthcare providers induced by fee-for-service remuneration may be a factor in the slow uptake of these regimens. Therefore, fee-for-service reimbursement may not be preferable for radiation oncology. We propose that an alternative system of remuneration, such as bundled payments based on stage and diagnosis, may provide more value for all stakeholders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33358283
pii: S0936-6555(20)30484-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
322-330Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR300024
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.