Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana.
CLTS
Cost effectiveness
Cost efficiency
Economic
Open defecation
Sanitation
Journal
International journal of hygiene and environmental health
ISSN: 1618-131X
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyg Environ Health
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100898843
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
07
04
2020
revised:
29
10
2020
accepted:
04
12
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We conducted cost effectiveness analyses of four different CLTS interventions implemented in Ethiopia and Ghana. In each country, a pilot approach in which additional local actors were trained in CLTS facilitation was compared to the conventional approach. Data were collected using bottom-up costing, household surveys, and observations. We assessed variability of cost effectiveness from a societal perspective for latrine ownership and latrine use outcomes in different contexts. Cost effectiveness ranged from $34-$1897 per household ($5.85-$563 per person) gaining access to a private latrine or stopping open defecation, depending on the intervention, context, and outcome considered. For three out of four interventions, CLTS appeared more cost effective at reducing open defecation than at increasing latrine ownership, although sensitivity analysis revealed considerable variation. The pilot approaches were more cost effective at reducing open defecation than conventional approaches in Ethiopia, but not in Ghana. CLTS has been promoted as a low-cost means of improving the ownership and use of sanitation facilities. In our study, the cost of CLTS per household gaining latrine access was slightly higher than in other studies, and the cost of CLTS per household stopping OD was slightly lower than in other studies. Our results show that aggregate measures mask considerable variability in costs and outcomes, and thus the importance of considering and reporting context and uncertainty in economic analysis of sanitation interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33360500
pii: S1438-4639(20)30628-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113682
pmc: PMC7873587
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113682Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.
Références
J Water Health. 2017 Feb;15(1):17-30
pubmed: 28151436
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(10):1054-9
pubmed: 6810469
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5466-5472
pubmed: 30946581
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jun 20;51(12):7219-7227
pubmed: 28514143
Heliyon. 2018 Oct 04;4(10):e00841
pubmed: 30302413
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928
pubmed: 27987641
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Aug;87(8):580-7
pubmed: 19705007
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 May;220(3):551-557
pubmed: 28522255
Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):903-6
pubmed: 25883316
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e659-60
pubmed: 26475003
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013 Mar 25;11(1):6
pubmed: 23531194
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Feb 02;126(2):026001
pubmed: 29398655
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Apr;220(2 Pt B):329-340
pubmed: 27825597
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e701-11
pubmed: 26475017
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Nov 2;95(5):1201-1210
pubmed: 27601516
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 May;23(5):508-525
pubmed: 29537671
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30338
pubmed: 22348005
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):1009-13
pubmed: 6431836
J Water Health. 2007 Dec;5(4):481-502
pubmed: 17878562
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;601-602:1075-1083
pubmed: 28599364
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 21;50(12):6517-25
pubmed: 27211881
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Jun;222(5):765-777
pubmed: 31088724
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 16;50(16):8867-75
pubmed: 27428399