Conservative management of pelvic fractures in dogs and cats in Algiers: Incidence and long-term clinical outcomes.
Cats
dogs
nonsurgical management
pelvic fractures
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
accepted:
09
10
2020
entrez:
28
12
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We performed a retrospective study to evaluate clinical complications and outcomes associated with non-operative management of pelvic fractures in dogs and cats and described owner satisfaction. Based on radiographic findings and fracture location, case records were classified into two groups. Group 1 included animals with acetabulum involvement that underwent conservative treatment plus femoral head-and-neck excision. Group 2 included animals without acetabulum involvement that underwent conservative treatment only. Compliance with rest instructions, time to locomotion recovery, and the evaluation of persistent lameness were data collected from the questionnaire. The level of satisfaction was classified as excellent, good, or bad. Clinical outcome was evaluated at least 10 months after the fracture. Pelvic injuries included sacroiliac luxations (59.52%) and ilial body (35.7%), acetabular (21.4%), pubic (21.4%), and ischial (14.28%) fractures alone or combined. According to the owners, the proposed strategy yielded good to excellent outcomes in dogs and cats in this study, with 95.23% of animals regaining full function of their hind limbs. Two dogs had slight chronic lameness, and some degree of gait abnormality persisted. Because of financial constraints, the chronicity of fractures, or lack of surgical techniques, the surgical treatment of pelvic fractures may not be possible. Non-operative treatment can then be considered to allow the animal to return to acceptable function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33363335
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2416-2421
pii: Vetworld-13-2416
pmc: PMC7750232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2416-2421Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Bouabdallah, et al.
Références
J Feline Med Surg. 2011 May;13(5):347-61
pubmed: 21515222
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2015;28(3):155-63
pubmed: 25757444
J Small Anim Pract. 1978 Mar;19(3):151-66
pubmed: 642475
J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Jun;22(6):575-581
pubmed: 31407942
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1819-1824
pubmed: 28602179
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):288-94
pubmed: 26754578
J Biomech. 2007;40(16):3732-7
pubmed: 17675043
Can Vet J. 2007 Apr;48(4):427-8
pubmed: 17494373
Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2002 Nov;17(4):190-203
pubmed: 12587286
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2017 Jul;47(4):885-897
pubmed: 28576273
Acta Vet Scand. 2015 Oct 05;57:68
pubmed: 26438541
Vet Surg. 2009 Apr;38(3):326-33
pubmed: 19573095
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(3):190-7
pubmed: 19448869
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24(2):137-41
pubmed: 21243178
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2002 Jul;32(4):949-62, vii-viii
pubmed: 12148320
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 Jul;29(4):407-412
pubmed: 31218799
Can Vet J. 2016 Sep;57(9):955-60
pubmed: 27587887
J Feline Med Surg. 2015 Aug;17(8):704-10
pubmed: 25376795
J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Jan;19(1):36-41
pubmed: 26445978
J Small Anim Pract. 1977 Jul;18(7):457-63
pubmed: 886835
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):412-6
pubmed: 22548361
J Small Anim Pract. 1979 Nov;20(11):661-74
pubmed: 547112